Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-22-2011, 02:38 AM   #21 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,181

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,525 Times in 2,799 Posts
If you want to just paint them even then it seems difficult to get paint to stick to new headers.
Once the headers have been installed and gotten some oil and rust on them you can forget about repainting them and getting the paint to stick around for a long time, unless you sand blast them. If you do sand blast the paint will stick to them and stay there like chewing gum on a cat.

For my diesel I am going to sand blast my turbo manifolds and ceramic coat them inside and out, I dont think the manifolds will be wraped.
The cross over pipe will be wraped with header wrap and covered with my salvaged "silicone sock".

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.

Last edited by oil pan 4; 12-22-2011 at 02:45 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-01-2012, 02:22 AM   #22 (permalink)
kah
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Denmark
Posts: 33

The Mii - '12 Seat Mii Reference
90 day: 54.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
I've done some digging around for more info on manifold and exhaust wrap. It seems very popular with performance modders, and should be very beneficial on turbo engines, adding low rpm torque, while not doing very much for high rpm horsepower.

What is generally advised is to use e special silicone sealant, on the manifold before you apply the wrap, and on the wrap once fitted. This should greatly reduce wear on the manifold.

Other than reducing the temperature under the bonnet, the extra low rev torque would likely increase FE. I might check it out in a couple of months, but it seems like quite a comprehensive mod if you have to take out the manifold to fit the wrap.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 10:21 AM   #23 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
kah, a lot of that is anecdotal. I've heard just as many tuners recommend against heat wrap/coatings because it can increase the likelihood of exhaust manifold failure. The primary (really, the only proven) reason to use heat coating is to reduce engine bay temperatures. Doing so prevents the turbo from heating up and passing that extra heat on to the intake air. If anything, according to a lot of people who have been trying to heat their intake air (WAI) for fuel economy, heat wraps might actually HURT fuel economy.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 06:27 AM   #24 (permalink)
kah
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Denmark
Posts: 33

The Mii - '12 Seat Mii Reference
90 day: 54.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Yes, and no. Reducing engine bay temperatures was a side effect to what powertuners wanted to achieve in the first place, the primary reason for heat wrapping manifolds and exhaust, was to reduce back pressure from the exhaust system for increase in power.
I'm not an expert on motor engineering, but from what I know of warm air intake, the purpose is to decrease the resistance of air when flowing through the throttle, only making it suitable for (non-turbo?) petrol engines.
For turbo diesels, a manifold and exhaust wrap would (theoretically) increase the energy transferred to the turbo, increase scavenging, lead to higher torque figures and improve fuel economy, however i have not been able to find any dyno test that confirm (nor any that refute) this claim, apart from one done by a manufacturer (of wrap)..
As for fatigue and wear on the wrapped parts, I'm pretty convinced that it's true, but a thing to consider is that most people who wrap their manifolds do it for power increase and drive their cars hard, and usually drive petrol engines, and the temperature of exhaust gas of diesel engines is lower than the exhaust gas of petrol engines. How big a difference that makes is impossible to know, but manifold fatigue is definitely a risk to consider.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 09:18 AM   #25 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
skyking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,399

Woody - '96 Dodge Ram 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 23.82 mpg (US)

Avion and Woody - '96 Dodge/Avion Ram 2500/5th wheel combo
90 day: 15.1 mpg (US)

TD eye eye eye - '03 Volkswagen Beetle GLS
90 day: 49.05 mpg (US)

Mule - '07 Dodge Ram 3500 ST
Thanks: 743
Thanked 528 Times in 344 Posts
I'm looking into it for my diesel truck, because anything I can do to lower underhood temps will also reduce the need for cooling air. The factory put so much excess air through there. They designed for a worst-case scenario. When I calibrate the grill louver system, one of the temps I will watch is the area right over the manifold and turbo. A blanket should help greatly.
__________________




2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SRW 4x4 with 6MT
2003 TDI Beetle
2002 TDI Beetle

currently parked - 1996 Dodge 2500 Cummins Turbodiesel
Custom cab, auto, 3.55 gears
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 09:10 PM   #26 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Yes, I've heard of all of those purposes, but what I was saying is that the only thing that I've seen proven is the decrease in engine bay temperatures. Everything else, including increased exhaust velocity, increased turbo efficiency, etc. is, as you said, unproven. I'm just not sure if it would affect mileage in any way.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 08:58 AM   #27 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
skyking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,399

Woody - '96 Dodge Ram 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 23.82 mpg (US)

Avion and Woody - '96 Dodge/Avion Ram 2500/5th wheel combo
90 day: 15.1 mpg (US)

TD eye eye eye - '03 Volkswagen Beetle GLS
90 day: 49.05 mpg (US)

Mule - '07 Dodge Ram 3500 ST
Thanks: 743
Thanked 528 Times in 344 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kah View Post
Yes, and no. Reducing engine bay temperatures was a side effect to what powertuners wanted to achieve in the first place, the primary reason for heat wrapping manifolds and exhaust, was to reduce back pressure from the exhaust system for increase in power.
I'm not an expert on motor engineering, but from what I know of warm air intake, the purpose is to decrease the resistance of air when flowing through the throttle, only making it suitable for (non-turbo?) petrol engines.
For turbo diesels, a manifold and exhaust wrap would (theoretically) increase the energy transferred to the turbo, increase scavenging, lead to higher torque figures and improve fuel economy, however i have not been able to find any dyno test that confirm (nor any that refute) this claim, apart from one done by a manufacturer (of wrap)..
As for fatigue and wear on the wrapped parts, I'm pretty convinced that it's true, but a thing to consider is that most people who wrap their manifolds do it for power increase and drive their cars hard, and usually drive petrol engines, and the temperature of exhaust gas of diesel engines is lower than the exhaust gas of petrol engines. How big a difference that makes is impossible to know, but manifold fatigue is definitely a risk to consider.
The cast iron manifold on my truck has 240,000 miles on it and has grown and warped over the years. I think a blanket my help that problem, since it will normalize the inside and outside temperatures quite a bit.
I do give the engine cool down time before shutdown, if I have been making significant power.
I have a fresh manifold that we are going to port and polish and install soon.
One of the things I have planned is to add pre- and post-aftercooler temperature gauges, and a drive pressure gauge. This will give me information on how tightly I can close down my cooling before it starts affecting inlet temps.
__________________




2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SRW 4x4 with 6MT
2003 TDI Beetle
2002 TDI Beetle

currently parked - 1996 Dodge 2500 Cummins Turbodiesel
Custom cab, auto, 3.55 gears
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2012, 11:52 AM   #28 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 134

Deceptive - '98 Dodge Neon R/T
90 day: 44.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
My engine will need a rebuild at some point in the coming years. When I do that, I plan on doing several things.

Friction reducing coatings from Swain tech to reduce frictional losses.

Oil shedding coatings on things like the rods and rockers.

Real 3mil thick ceramic coatings on the piston tops, combustion chambers, valve faces, and exhaust ports. Real 15mil thick ceramic coatings on the header, pipes leading up to the cat, and the entire rest of the exhaust. All from swain tech. They will probably then get wrapped in header wrap, and sealed completely.

Whether or not the increased flow thing makes a difference, i'll be giving it the best chance to work. On top of that, the coolant temp reductions and engine compartment temp reductions are proven, which will allow a smaller radiator and less grill area. Plus, header wrap will also slightly quiet the exhaust note even further.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 07:43 PM   #29 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
I have heard from some old-school racers that all of those coatings do help to make power in full-tilt-boogie race motors. Oil shed on the inside of the block (gets oil back to the pan faster), knife-edged crank throws, boat-tailed mains (help with air flow management inside the engine), teflon wrist pin buttons, and so on.

Many of them are only intended to work at high RPMs, which is not where fuel economy is found. It would be interesting to see what good any of them would do for MPGs.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 12:27 PM   #30 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 134

Deceptive - '98 Dodge Neon R/T
90 day: 44.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
Yep^, I figure they are in the realm of diminishing returns, but my goal isnt savings, so I figured I would try it.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com