11-03-2012, 04:21 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: MI, USA
Posts: 571
Thanks: 8
Thanked 73 Times in 50 Posts
|
Farm Tracktor engine in truck gets 45mpg...
Well at least according to this guy. He also says the mustang gets 50mpg, seems the car would get quite a bit better compared to the truck, something just don't add up right in my mind..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...v=WnoWfWjzFK4#!
Only thing I can think of is if he went slow, I know these engines are all about torque instead of hp, interesting idea though.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-03-2012, 06:26 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324
MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
|
load of crap, rainbow colored variety.
__________________
|
|
|
11-03-2012, 06:40 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
The Dirty330 Modder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North East Ohio, USA
Posts: 642
Thanks: 10
Thanked 67 Times in 59 Posts
|
Ive actually seen a forum were a good amount of people have done this. They put tractor diesels into there truck fabricate an adapter to hook them up to a normal automotive transmission and claim above 35 mpg highway. They are all about torque which is why they would be good for a conversion. I wouldn't doubt its possible
__________________
"The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing."
- Henry Ford
|
|
|
11-03-2012, 07:30 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
|
You know Henry used a basic tractor motor in his first cars and trucks. The average back then was 35mpg.
|
|
|
11-03-2012, 07:35 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324
MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
|
pretty sure they couldn't hope to achieve 50MPH back then though.
__________________
|
|
|
11-03-2012, 09:52 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Columbus, Ga
Posts: 154
Thanks: 15
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
|
well a smaller displacement diesel would help keep the vehicle in ideal BSFC driving normally. So the truck doing better than the mustang would be explained that way by engine load.
|
|
|
11-09-2012, 03:20 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
The PRC.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
|
Would be simpler and get better results with a TDI conversion, abnd the 50 MPH limit would be gone.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
|
|
|
11-09-2012, 03:28 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: MI, USA
Posts: 571
Thanks: 8
Thanked 73 Times in 50 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arragonis
Would be simpler and get better results with a TDI conversion, abnd the 50 MPH limit would be gone.
|
I don't think a TDI from like a VW would give the owner that kind of mileage this person in the video claims. For a car, yes, but a full sized truck unmodded... I just don't see it.. it would have to be able to get like 80-100mpg in a car then.
|
|
|
11-09-2012, 04:18 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,891
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,685 Times in 1,503 Posts
|
It's not so hard to reach low 20s (city) to 30MPG (highway) in a regular-cab F250 with a Cummins 4BT.
|
|
|
11-09-2012, 05:01 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
The PRC.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ps2fixer
I don't think a TDI from like a VW would give the owner that kind of mileage this person in the video claims. For a car, yes, but a full sized truck unmodded... I just don't see it.. it would have to be able to get like 80-100mpg in a car then.
|
Yeah, but it would be more usable.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
|
|
|
|