05-12-2012, 10:00 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 46
Thanks: 14
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
First Goal: 550hp LS1 Getting 30mpg
Thought I'd post up my current project - trying to get 30mpg out of my 550hp LS1. That is about 36mpg imperial - quite a hard thing to get out of a 4 door family sedan with an auto. No problem in a 6sp Vette.
Car is an Australian Holden Commodore SS. Model is a VT series 2 with the LS1 5.7 V8 and the 4160e auto through a 3.07:1 rear end. Car weighs aprox 3750lbs (not weighed it but based on specs). They are like a 4 door GTO.
It has averaged 18.75mpg over the last 50,000 miles combined city and highway. (We work in metric or imperial down under but all figures I quote will be converted to US to ensure comparability).
Well, I've achieved the first goal (550hp) thanks to a low boost turbo set up at the back (STS custom setup). Now I'm working on the 2nd part (30mpg at cruise). That bit seems a tad harder.
Best so far of 25.8mpg under pretty much ideal cruise conditions and it is as lean as it will run without stumbling on itself - so no more tuning is going to help (about 20 hours on dyno just doing drivability etc so I'm not exaggerating).
Before I changed the cam the car could get 27.5mpg on a long trip. The cam has cost me about 15% in lost mpg overall but the extra 50rwhp is not coming off anytime soon as I like it too much, so I have to get creative now.
Here are my thoughts to get it done:
1 - Fit Rhoads variable duration roller lifters. This will bleed off (depending on how much adjustment we give it) from 5 - 15 degrees of cam duration at low rpms. This will lift vacuum and make the cam behave like a stock one - lifting mpg and power at low revs we hope. As the rpms climb the cam will retain its current specs so this mod should retain top end while improving the bottom end.
The down side will be a requirement to run adjustable roller rockers and hence noise and lash adjustment checks every oil change - but I can live with that.
The lower duration at low rpms should enable us to run less idle and maybe a little leaner.
I'm hoping this alone will get me back to 27.5mpg at cruise (av 62mph or 100kph). That would be 33mpg imperial.
2 - Fit a Plasma ignition system - the Blue Phoenix unit tested by David Vizard. The bigger spark is worth a few extra hp I likely won't notice, but what it will do is greatly enhance our ability to run leaner - we should now be able to get into the 20's A/F without power loss at cruise....
3 - Fit another water/meth injection system (the one I have only comes on under boost and is not mappable). They can share tanks but I'm thinking of using a modern ultra accurate EFI feul injector and adapting any old ECU to run it then inject water/meth under lean burn conditions.
e.g. the GM computer we have set to bring in lean burn after a few seconds of steady light throttle cruise, if we could pick up the signal when it is triggered we could simply tell the water ecu to follow suit and start injecting.
We could run water/meth all the time in direct proportion to gas (about 20% by volume) but we'd then need to refill the 15L tank every tank of gas - and that'd get tricky seeing as methanol is not exactly at most service stations. Yes we could run 100% water, but at 10.5:1 compression with boost, I'd rather have the added insurance of 50% meth.
I'm hoping the plasma and water/meth will get me past 30mpg by allowing a much leaner mix than the engine can now tolerate while maintaining adequate power to hold cruise speeds.
A later project will involve a new built engine and then we'll go for 40mpg and 600rwhp, but I need to walk before I can run.
I believe we can have our cake and eat it too - we do not need small engines to get acceptable mileage. I know of a 500 cubic inch twin turbo Viper that makes over 1000hp (at crank) and can get 30mpg under steady cruise. That is no longer technically difficult. Getting to average 35mpg IS difficult.
Welcome anyones thoughts
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-13-2012, 12:54 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
|
smaller cam and more boost.
|
|
|
05-13-2012, 05:36 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Drive less save more
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,189
Thanks: 134
Thanked 162 Times in 135 Posts
|
I like the comfort of a 4 door, your car sounds like a rocket, I do feel that 15% increase in your car's fuel economy is to high of a penalty for the 50 more hp you may or may not use. Offhand my suggestion would be to throw a medium size turbo on it and use the boost when you feel like it a.k.a put your foot down..
__________________
Save gas
Ride a Mtn bike for errands exercise entertainment and outright fun
__________________
|
|
|
05-13-2012, 05:48 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecomodded
Offhand my suggestion would be to throw a medium size turbo on it and use the boost when you feel like it a.k.a put your foot down..
|
he already has a turbo....are you suggesting another one? are you suggesting to change the size of the current one?
"Medium" soulds pretty generic. given his specs can you be more specific....and clear up what he does with his current turbo.
|
|
|
05-13-2012, 05:50 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
I would first ask if you have increased the psi in the tires?
Since you are obviously VERY mechanicly inclined , have you thought about a slightly taller tire or working w/ the rear ratio?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mcrews For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-13-2012, 06:12 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Drive less save more
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,189
Thanks: 134
Thanked 162 Times in 135 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrews
he already has a turbo....are you suggesting another one? are you suggesting to change the size of the current one?
"Medium" soulds pretty generic. given his specs can you be more specific....and clear up what he does with his current turbo.
|
Rather then a low boost set up, a 20 lb boost medium size quicker spooling turbo, although a twin turbo would be more fulfilling.. a small turbo for acceleration and a big turbo to pass losto air for top speed
__________________
Save gas
Ride a Mtn bike for errands exercise entertainment and outright fun
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ecomodded For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-13-2012, 08:56 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 975
Thanks: 193
Thanked 312 Times in 221 Posts
|
I think you're getting to the point where diminishing returns will really start to kick in as far as engine efficiency goes. You would probably get much better gains-per-dollar with some aero mods, pumping up the tires as much as you can, or a manual transmission swap. My GTO has a 6sp and will putt along at 1600RPM at your 62MPH cruise speed, the RPM difference between auto and manual would be at least 10% (0.7:1 to 0.57:1 with the transmissions offered in the GTO).
However, if saving money isn't your main goal and you just want to see how far you can push the engine, I wish you luck doing what most people would consider crazy/impossible. I love that my stock LS1 can hold its own compared to cars with smaller engines when cruising, I hope that you can make a more powerful one crush them.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to vskid3 For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-13-2012, 09:31 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecomodded
Rather then a low boost set up, a 20 lb boost medium size quicker spooling turbo, although a twin turbo would be more fulfilling.. a small turbo for acceleration and a big turbo to pass losto air for top speed
|
Thanke for the clarification! I appreciate it.
|
|
|
05-13-2012, 10:59 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Corning, AR (NEA)
Posts: 88
Thanks: 12
Thanked 44 Times in 27 Posts
|
Sounds like you have done almost everything possible to maximize the efficiency of your horsepower motor. Some aero mods would help (I'm thinking belly pan). I am sure you don't want to ugly up your cars profile in the name of efficiency.
I was thinking about a higher overdrive gear in the transmission. How many RPMs are you running at your desired speed? My guess is they are quite low and there is little to be gained here.
I know the Holdens are typically overbuilt to deal with the bad roads found in your neck of the woods. Is there any potential for weight loss?
The lifter thing is interesting. Didn't know that was out there in the aftermarket. I would make the changes you mentioned and see where you end up. If that didn't do it...Like the other guy mentioned, a smaller cam with the psi turned up may be your best option. The boost would cover the reduced power being made on the motor. PM me or post the changes you see with the lifters, that’s just cool that they have those. I am picturing an adjustable screw that bleeds oil based on how far you back it out. Is that correct?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Iexpedite For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-13-2012, 02:58 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 72
Thanks: 6
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
I think the Rhoads lifter is going to hurt you. If you're going to try it do it on intake only. The exhaust closing ramp on all cams is very gentle. If you're running a knock sensor its going to hear the noise and pull out some advance. High intake vacume=higher pumping losses. Open waste gate at low throttle to reduce exhaust back pressure. I'd try retarding the cam 5deg. keeping exhaust valve closed longer extracting more usefull work from still relativly high cylinder pressure. Later intake closing lowers vacume. Pull an 8"hg depression into crankcase via intake vacume. Don't pull any more as gaskets and seals don't like it. Last heat the fuel to 180deg. F This will extend your lean burn limit and slighlty higher flame speed. It may tend to vapor lock on hot restarts. Turn off fuel pump while cranking cures that.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to smokey442 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|