Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-29-2010, 10:55 AM   #41 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
From fueleconomy.gov's user-submitted mileage:
6AT 36.5 mpg Model 1 Vehicle Characteristics
5MT 36.6 mpg Model 1 Vehicle Characteristics

There are only 3 and 4 respondants so far, so it could be subject to change. The results are currently close enough to call it a tie.

__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-29-2010, 11:31 AM   #42 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by comptiger5000 View Post
Typically, the MT will get better mileage around town (with an efficient driver). It's on the highway at steady speed where the gearing difference comes into play.
This isn't your typical automatic.

Just to recap the first post.
Quote:
Here is what I got;

Manual - 19.9 mpg avg
Automatic - 29.9 mpg avg

I drove both the exact same way, being mindful of my coasts, distances etc ... What I find is that the manual is extemely lacking in torque forcing you to go deeper into the throttle to get any responce from what seems like an underpowered engine.

On the other hand, the automatic with its new transmission was the exact opposite. It felt like the vehicle had the Mustang 5.0 under the hood, often forcing me to reduce throttle to not accelerate much harder than intended. The shifting was super smooth and while you could still tell you were driving a small 4cyl, it was much more balanced than the manual experience.

If I had to choose based on those test drives, I would take the automatic hands down.

Hopefully ford advances this transmission a little more in future models as it is lacking in the out of throttle cruise realm. Not until 20mph do you feel the clutches completely disengage and allow for free wheeling. The exception of course being cruising in neutral ...

If you have any other questions, ask me I should be able to answer them or get you answers ...
I'm inclined to believe the guy that drove the cars back.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 02:38 PM   #43 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
I know it's not a typical auto. I was referring to the MT having more driver control, allowing efficiency to be forced.

__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Auto Meter 9100 ecometer MPG gauge gone-ot Instrumentation 27 08-26-2013 01:11 PM
Review: 2008 Chevy Malibu LT (31.3 MPG) RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 12 05-16-2009 09:07 AM
Review: 2008 Toyota Avalon Touring Edition (32.8 MPG) RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 2 09-04-2008 01:27 PM
Review: 2009 Toyota Corolla LE (37.9 MPG) RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 22 05-09-2008 04:55 PM
Autoblog Prius review: more evidence of the power of MPG instrumentation MetroMPG Instrumentation 6 01-02-2008 11:48 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com