Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-04-2014, 01:55 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ford focus 91 octane question

I have heard some engines can get better mileage with 91 octane, because the knock sensor will advance (or Mayby it was retard, I'm not sure) the timing. Any truth to this? Would it be worth experimenting with?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-04-2014, 01:56 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's at 2011 btw if that helps
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2014, 02:17 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
KrautBurner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SUNNY Sequim, Wa
Posts: 239

Cavalier of D00M - '05 Pontiac GTO LS2 T56
90 day: 23.2 mpg (US)

The New One - '10 Toyota Prius II
90 day: 51.55 mpg (US)

Chick Magnet - '91 Geo Metro 3cyl/5sp
90 day: 48.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 79
Thanked 40 Times in 34 Posts
if the car isn't made to optomize premium
it won't help

if you can advance your timing, you may be able to squeeze more mpg out of premium

but the knock sensor is a safety feature, to retard timing if needed
this will lower your fuel economy


rule of thumb
do not run Premium fuel in a vehicle that is not designed for it
__________________
2005 GTO 6.0 V8 (600hp)

1991 Geo Metro 1.0 3/5 base

2010 Prius II (replaced 2001 Tahoe 5.3 V8 April 2014)

1994 F-350 7.3 TurboDiesel (Rollin' Coal)
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2014, 09:13 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
For the cars that can take advantage of it, the cost isnt worth it from a mpg stand point. From a drive-ability point it does.

The 2nd gen insight behaviors like a completely different car on 93 octane, but you dont break even or save more. Its just more fun to drive.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2014, 09:40 PM   #5 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,742

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 85.85 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,469 Times in 3,434 Posts
My TSX is designed to run 91 PON, but I don't notice any difference in MPG running 87 (although there may be some small unmeasurable change).

I do notice less power and retarded timing when running 87 octane, but it doesn't appear to affect the MPG in any way that I can measure.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2014, 10:46 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
red, I think your gearing is too low to benefit from it at highway speeds, maybe in the city. The higher octane fuel allows the engine to handle more load at a lower rpm and run higher tming. If its a turbo or super charged engine it can handle more boost at lower rpms too.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cobb For This Useful Post:
redpoint5 (04-05-2014)
Old 04-04-2014, 11:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
We'll I tried testing it today. I had gone on a work trip yesterday about 250 miles and gotten about 33 mpg. I put 91 in it on the way back, but I hit such a crosswind and headwind I stop even trying to be consistent with the driving style from the way there, and ended up just trying for max mpg at 45 once the wind died down

Actually hit 37ish with cruise on
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2014, 01:17 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 132

The Rental - '13 Hyundai i30
90 day: 37.55 mpg (US)

Autocross - '04 Ford Focus ZX3
90 day: 24.76 mpg (US)

The Wifes - '02 Ford Focus SVT
90 day: 23.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 48 Times in 38 Posts
your engine was designed for 87. it won't advance the timing. The car nornally runs full advance until it senses knock then retards it.

If Ford could easily get an MPG improvment by specifying 91 octane, they would just to help their CAFE fleet mileage.

also, do a quick match calculation to see how much MPG imrpovement you would need to see tust to break even on the more $$ gas.

summary: don't bother
__________________





  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Thenorm For This Useful Post:
KrautBurner (04-05-2014)
Old 04-05-2014, 06:27 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
graver, higher octane loves more load. If you get a chance do a 0-60 run to see what other differences you see. For the insight for example the engine runs lower rpms under harder acceleration and seems to peak the tach at 4700. On the moose piss cheap stuff it bounces off the red limiter.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2014, 07:53 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
We'll it sounds like it won't help so I'm not going to do Aba tests as it is my gf's moms car anyway.

Thank you for all the replpies

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com