Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-24-2012, 12:48 PM   #11 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
@mech - thats a bumper car for the road

__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-24-2012, 01:53 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 238

Grasshopper - '11 Ford Fiesta SES
Team Ford
90 day: 50.37 mpg (US)

Feejer - '09 Yamaha FJR1300 AE
Motorcycle
90 day: 42.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 68
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
Track drive is showing the way to the future.



Kirk
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 02:01 PM   #13 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I've gone on about the pros and cons of rear engines before. In the real world the cons are pretty big.

Diagonal drive: King Midget! And it's probably OK in many situations.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 02:16 PM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
tortoise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 71

number 9 - '89 Geo Metro LSi
90 day: 49.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
For hypermiling, with low power/weight, weight transfer effects are insignificant, thus the packaging advantages of fwd are strong. For go-fast, rwd wins, on braking as well as acceleration.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 02:22 PM   #15 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
tortoise -

Quote:
Originally Posted by tortoise View Post
For hypermiling, with low power/weight, weight transfer effects are insignificant, thus the packaging advantages of fwd are strong. For go-fast, rwd wins, on braking as well as acceleration.
That's what I was thinking, packaging. Those 1970's VW Rabbit commercials of rational design did their job well!

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 02:27 PM   #16 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian View Post
Front? Rear? 4? How about SIX wheel drive. More is better, right?
10 wheel drive is better and if I can find that weird slinky looking thing possibly 24 wheel drive
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	lvsr.JPG
Views:	568
Size:	18.8 KB
ID:	10121  
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 03:26 PM   #17 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Hmmm - RWD advantage ? Only if you lack the skills padawans...



EDIT - I forgot to mention at 4:45 in this the guy says "I drive a diesel estate and try and get 50 miles per gallon out of it..."

No I am not bald.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]

Last edited by Arragonis; 01-24-2012 at 03:35 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Arragonis For This Useful Post:
CigaR007 (01-25-2012)
Old 01-24-2012, 03:38 PM   #18 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by FXSTi View Post
Track drive is showing the way to the future.



Kirk
Well - circa 1970s or something, the current rockets go by rail

__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 04:02 PM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
tortoise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 71

number 9 - '89 Geo Metro LSi
90 day: 49.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arragonis View Post
Hmmm - RWD advantage ? Only if you lack the skills padawans...
O Master, in low-power, low-traction applications, it may be so.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 04:38 PM   #20 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tortoise View Post
O Master, in low-power, low-traction applications, it may be so.
What, Po, be the limit in power for FWD applications ?

The last limit I read about was one posted by Mr Audi who stated that 200 would be just about controllable in FWD.

I suspect Mr Audi may have been speaking with the tongue of a reptile as he wanted sell to the world his magic called Quattro. Later however he also sold the magic carriage known as the A8 with only FWD as well as many A6s with FWD and more than 200hp.

__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com