Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-05-2008, 08:48 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
badaz907's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: North Providence, RI
Posts: 22

Corolla s - '10 Toyota Corolla S
90 day: 32.59 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to badaz907
fuel question

shell mobil sunoco hess what do you use, I noticed better results with mobil over shell, this tank is sunoco

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-06-2008, 05:51 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,306
Thanks: 24,436
Thanked 7,384 Times in 4,782 Posts
All fuels are basically refined to the same standards.Their upper and lower heating values will be identical.One brand over another should not make any difference.That's not what oil companies would have you believe,however that's the reality of it.A laboratory is the best places to test such things, as there are so many variables which can cause a change in mpg in the real world,you would be hard-pressed to sort it all out.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 01:14 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Russellville, KY
Posts: 540
Thanks: 8
Thanked 33 Times in 27 Posts
I did use BP all of the time until one of the Texaco stations started being $.10-$.15 a gallon cheaper. I switched and started using Texaco most of the time and saw my FE go up on my '88 Escort. I doesn't seem to matter to the '97 Escort it gets about the same mileage on either. I think the major differences in brands is the additives they put into their fuel.
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 01:49 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
ptsmith24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 177

El Camrino - '90 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 32.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've put BP in my tank the past two fillups. My FE went up, but that's probably due to my driving habits and tire pressure more than anything. Besides, it would probably take more than a couple tanks to come to any sort of reasonable conclusion.
__________________
"It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived."
- General George S. Patton, Jr

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 01:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
Truck Nut
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 12

Blue BAT - '06 Toyota Tundra Double Cab
90 day: 16.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Pump calibrations.

Always remember that gas station pumps are rarely spot on accurate. All jurisdictions allow some percentage error in measurement. Some allow as much as +/- 5%.

Let's say you start with a full tank and drive 300 miles. When you fill up the pump registered 10 gallons. However, that pump reads 2.5% low so you really put 10.25 gallons (the real amount you burned) in your tank. You figure your FE based on the pump readout and figure you got 30 mpg.

You then drive back to your starting point and fill up again. But, this pump reads 2.5% high. You put 10.25 gallons (the real amount you burned) into your tank but the pump readout is 10.4 gallons. You figure your mileage based on the pump readout and figure you got only 28.85 mpg.

If the first pump is Texaco and the second pump is Mobil, you arrive at the erroneous conclusion that you get better mileage burning Texaco when in reality you got exactly the same mileage from both.
__________________
Truck Nut
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 01:58 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
ptsmith24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 177

El Camrino - '90 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 32.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKWPrime View Post
Always remember that gas station pumps are rarely spot on accurate. All jurisdictions allow some percentage error in measurement. Some allow as much as +/- 5%.

Let's say you start with a full tank and drive 300 miles. When you fill up the pump registered 10 gallons. However, that pump reads 2.5% low so you really put 10.25 gallons (the real amount you burned) in your tank. You figure your FE based on the pump readout and figure you got 30 mpg.

You then drive back to your starting point and fill up again. But, this pump reads 2.5% high. You put 10.25 gallons (the real amount you burned) into your tank but the pump readout is 10.4 gallons. You figure your mileage based on the pump readout and figure you got only 28.85 mpg.

If the first pump is Texaco and the second pump is Mobil, you arrive at the erroneous conclusion that you get better mileage burning Texaco when in reality you got exactly the same mileage from both.
But can that not be somewhat controlled by filling up at the same pump, same time, same direction, etc.? I mean, even if that isn't possible, sticking with the same brand over several tanks should increase the odds of the percent error of the pump measurements balancing out over time. Makes sense in my little mind.
__________________
"It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived."
- General George S. Patton, Jr

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 02:08 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Russellville, KY
Posts: 540
Thanks: 8
Thanked 33 Times in 27 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKWPrime View Post
Always remember that gas station pumps are rarely spot on accurate. All jurisdictions allow some percentage error in measurement. Some allow as much as +/- 5%.

Let's say you start with a full tank and drive 300 miles. When you fill up the pump registered 10 gallons. However, that pump reads 2.5% low so you really put 10.25 gallons (the real amount you burned) in your tank. You figure your FE based on the pump readout and figure you got 30 mpg.

You then drive back to your starting point and fill up again. But, this pump reads 2.5% high. You put 10.25 gallons (the real amount you burned) into your tank but the pump readout is 10.4 gallons. You figure your mileage based on the pump readout and figure you got only 28.85 mpg.

If the first pump is Texaco and the second pump is Mobil, you arrive at the erroneous conclusion that you get better mileage burning Texaco when in reality you got exactly the same mileage from both.

I usually use the same pump at the same station, but I have also used different pumps at different stations with the same results and I always fill to the cap.
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 02:11 PM   #8 (permalink)
Truck Nut
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 12

Blue BAT - '06 Toyota Tundra Double Cab
90 day: 16.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Correct ptsmith24.

You are correct. Filling up with different pumps will average out over time. The original poster was talking about filling up with two different brands and noting a mileage difference and I was pointing out that the difference could be entirely due to errors in measurement.

Another point. Supposed he filled up with Brand X and drove 300 miles on a calm day. Then filled up with Brand Y and drove 300 miles but it was into a 15 mph headwind. Without allowing for the wind, it would appear that Brand X gives better mileage than Brand Y.

Now, if you keep very careful records about which fuel (and pump) you use on every fillup, record the weather and road conditions, etc. You really can't conclude that one brand of go-juice is really any better than another.
__________________
Truck Nut
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 04:05 PM   #9 (permalink)
econ00b
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: phoenix, az
Posts: 52

green car - '91 honda civic hb dx
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I only use Shell, Mobil or Chevron/Texaco. All 3 of those have top tier additives, may or may not help with FE, but I enjoy the peace of mind knowing at least it will help prevent some gunk build up.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2008, 04:46 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
ptsmith24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 177

El Camrino - '90 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 32.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1.5Ldave View Post
I only use Shell, Mobil or Chevron/Texaco. All 3 of those have top tier additives, may or may not help with FE, but I enjoy the peace of mind knowing at least it will help prevent some gunk build up.
Do you have any actual proof of this (besides commercials) somewhere or what? I really am curious...

__________________
"It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived."
- General George S. Patton, Jr

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel Economy related papers tasdrouille General Efficiency Discussion 41 03-19-2021 07:31 PM
smart cdi (diesel) owner from BC, Canada smartzuuk Introductions 29 09-06-2018 04:09 PM
mileage computer for a carbureted engine diesel_john Instrumentation 221 05-01-2014 11:38 PM
ElmScan + Customized Scantool Software = data logging! cfg83 Instrumentation 19 08-08-2010 10:24 PM
Chysler patent raises technical question about injector accuracy monroe74 OpenGauge / MPGuino FE computer 11 09-12-2008 10:21 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com