Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-25-2011, 09:11 PM   #11 (permalink)
Enthusiastic EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 90

Gnatmobile - '96 Geo Metro LSI
90 day: 44.68 mpg (US)

theRAV - '01 Toyota RAV4 NV
90 day: 21.07 mpg (US)

ACCELICA - '95 Toyota Celica GT Convertible
Last 3: 23.46 mpg (US)

The Van - '05 Chevrolet Uplander LS LWB
90 day: 21.04 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 31 Times in 12 Posts
WOOT! Best tank ever pushed me into the 50MPG club

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-30-2011, 08:21 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Joe1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: FL
Posts: 79
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
That's all good and well but where's the actual testing by several different people that shows a consistent improvement percentage. If you don't know the percent mpg improvement you can't ever judge if it is worth doing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2011, 09:37 PM   #13 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,742

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 85.85 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,469 Times in 3,434 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe1234 View Post
That's all good and well but where's the actual testing by several different people that shows a consistent improvement percentage. If you don't know the percent mpg improvement you can't ever judge if it is worth doing.
Well said; that was my complaint about this thread. This could be significantly more valuable to the EM community if we had quantifiable data obtained from controlled testing.

I'm hoping to avoid hypocrisy when I install my grill block this winter. Best way to test is a coast-down? Maybe combine it with ABA MPG runs?
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 09:44 PM   #14 (permalink)
Enthusiastic EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 90

Gnatmobile - '96 Geo Metro LSI
90 day: 44.68 mpg (US)

theRAV - '01 Toyota RAV4 NV
90 day: 21.07 mpg (US)

ACCELICA - '95 Toyota Celica GT Convertible
Last 3: 23.46 mpg (US)

The Van - '05 Chevrolet Uplander LS LWB
90 day: 21.04 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 31 Times in 12 Posts
I definitely see the value of testing, I just don't have a realistic way to accomplish it. I live in the heart of a city of 7+million people so finding a good test route to do ABA testing or even an empty hill to do terminal velocity test is pretty much impossible. Combine that with the fact I don't have a garage and do all my modifications streetside and it's even more impractical.

My personal approach has been to scour the site for mods others have tested on my car and replicate those mods (with whatever tweaks make it easier for me). MetroMPG is famous for testing his mods and most of mine have been direct copies. I try to do good how-to write-ups to be helpful to others who want to try these mods and add innovative ideas for modification to the community.

In the case of the belly pan MetroMPG did do some ABA testing but it was too annoying to put it on and take it off and the gains seemed too insignificant from the limited test so he didn't continue with it. This is the only mod I've done where there wasn't solid groundwork already laid for my specific vehicle.

I think it would be cool to know the % improvements of each mod but I just don't have that data. I know it's not scientific and people aren't fans of tank to tank data but my personal approach is that is the real world test measured by my wallet. In a way I'd rather see the MPG results tank to tank than on a spreadsheet because I actually pay for the tanks.

I'm just doing what I can - ABA testing is not in that realm but I hope my posts are found helpful to others anyway. And in the end it's a fun hobby to mod, hipermile, and post so I don't have any regrets
__________________
"You too can get 50 Miles per Gallon, all it will cost is your self-respect."

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 02:41 AM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
puddleglum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Posts: 421

Rondo - '07 Kia Rondo EX
Last 3: 20.47 mpg (US)

Tinkertoy2 - '00 Toyota Echo base
Team Toyota
Last 3: 46.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 96 Times in 69 Posts
I hear you. ABA testing on a belly pan is not an easy task. Even on a simple pan like the one you built, it is quite an undertaking to take it off and reinstall it. Still, it would be nice if you could post avg. mileage data from before and after. I assume that you track your mileage. Once you've had a chance to run with the pan on for a while, you should be able to have a pretty good idea of % of improvement. It's not as good as ABA but it's more accurate than just saying that you had good mileage on one tank.
I am amazed that the exhaust hasn't melted the plastic. I had to leave quite a large gap around my exhaust and shield the pan with fiberglass to keep it from melting.

__________________



Almost all my driving is done 1-5 miles at a time.
Best short trip: 2.4 l/100 km, 3.9 km
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com