Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Introductions
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-12-2012, 09:56 AM   #11 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,381

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.07 mpg (US)

Winter beater Metro - '00 Chevrolet Metro
90 day: 61.98 mpg (US)

Fancy Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 58.72 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 50.04 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,920
Thanked 6,771 Times in 3,512 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wmjinman View Post
4) That brings us to the surprise that it was so "straight"... I was expecting it to curve over sharply and to drop like a rock at 70 and above, but it didn't - just kept decreasing at about the same rate....
That sometimes happens. Even though the aerodynamic load is going up dramatically as speed increases, depending on gearing and the engine in question, the engine may be be getting closer to its peak high-load efficiency zone - see Brake Specific Fuel Consumption (BSFC) Maps - EcoModder

Approaching peak BSFC as speed climbs would tend to "flatten out" the line on the chart. (Moreso than you would see with an electric vehicle, by comparison.)

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-13-2012, 03:53 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Carson City, Nevada
Posts: 612

Jimmy - '00 GMC Jimmy SLT
90 day: 21.18 mpg (US)

The White Gnat - '99 Suzuki Swift
Team Suzuki
90 day: 51.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 109 Times in 87 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
Most likely not.
Though the relative results will still remain after calibration.

The results from 35-45 seem to be in the same ballpark, though it could well be your car's most FE speed is 40.

At reasonable speeds though.
Depending on gearing, it may well be 20 mph ... at idle rpm in a high gear.


Road-testing for FE is tricky, as things change along the way - often beyond your control.
What we perceive as flat isn't always so flat either
To do this really right, one'd have to measure the exact same stretch of road every time (from a milepost or a sign to another such landmark).

Site-starter MetroMPG has a thread on how to do road testing the right way - or as right as the road will allow you to test - (http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...ery-11445.html )

Personally, I don't do dedicated tests.
I do try out things on my regular commute.
If it works, it'll show on the gauges and ultimately show up in the fuel stats.
Thanks euromodder,

I followed the link to MetroMPG's thread and read the entire thing on the proper way to do testing. Very enlightening. Obviously, my "single pass each way" wasn't very scientific, but I think I still gained some valuable information from it.

Regarding your caution about using the same section of road each time to a certain sign or milepost, I did that. Also, I did it both directions, so any deviation from "true level" should be compensated for, as well as any steady wind from any direction. And while the course was not level, and did, indeed have minor hills, I believe going both directions should have given me a pretty good average. And it was 5.3 miles (over 8 km) from one end to the other, so I think it was far enough to take out random little events.

Finally, my main purpose was to see if I could discern any difference in mpg with speed (boy, did I!), and furthermore, what seems to be the "best speed". So while I won't take the absolute mpg numbers as gospel, I think I now have a pretty good idea of how my car's gas mileage changes with speed.

Once I'm down to 1/4 tank, I'll do the "fillup calibration" on the ScanGauge, and go repeat parts of the test for comparison, probably just 40, 50, and 60 mph if there seems to be a good correlation to the first test. My "real" goal is to start testing my mods, rather than come up with exact mpg figures for different speeds in "stock" configuration.

Thanks,
Bill

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com