Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-19-2013, 01:32 AM   #1 (permalink)
Lots of Questions
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose
Posts: 665

Motor-Rolla - '01 Toyota Corolla LE
Team Toyota
90 day: 28.3 mpg (US)

Gaia - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 19.78 mpg (US)

Gaia - Round 2 - '99 Toyota 4runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 343
Thanked 101 Times in 79 Posts
Grill Block (upper or lower, full or partial?)

I have read here about people doing grill blocks and I would like to follow suit. I know that I will probably have to do a partial block to allow for cooling.

My question is which grill should be the partial and which should be the full block, the top grill or bottom grill? Or should I do partials on both, but keep each less open then 1 partial and 1 full (e.g. both at 75% block, rather than 1 at 100% and 1 at 50%)?

I have seen people keep the left or right side open, but I am thinking about keeping the middle open in hopes of better airflow right at the radiator, making it possible to block just a little bit more.

Thanks for your help!

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-19-2013, 02:02 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Carson City, Nevada
Posts: 612

Jimmy - '00 GMC Jimmy SLT
90 day: 21.18 mpg (US)

The White Gnat - '99 Suzuki Swift
Team Suzuki
90 day: 51.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 114 Times in 90 Posts
What kind of car? Did you get the Focus?

Seems like the general consensus around here is to completely block the upper grille & leave the partial opening, if any, in the lower.

With my Swift, I've got almost the entire grille completely blocked & haven't seen any heating problems. Must watch it close as the weather warms up, though. The ScanGauge is great for this - continuous digital readout of water temperature along with your choice of 3 other readouts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2013, 03:06 AM   #3 (permalink)
Lots of Questions
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose
Posts: 665

Motor-Rolla - '01 Toyota Corolla LE
Team Toyota
90 day: 28.3 mpg (US)

Gaia - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 19.78 mpg (US)

Gaia - Round 2 - '99 Toyota 4runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 343
Thanked 101 Times in 79 Posts
I have a 2001 Toyota Corolla. I definitely want a scanguage, just waiting for the right time (e.g. paycheck! ), especially for keeping an eye on the temps. Thanks for your help!
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2013, 08:33 AM   #4 (permalink)
T-100 Road Warrior
 
BamZipPow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 1,920

BZP T-100 (2010) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 24 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2011) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 23.66 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2009) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 19.01 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2012) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 25.45 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2013) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 25.79 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2014) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 23.18 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2015) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 23.85 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2016) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 17.62 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2017) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
90 day: 20.78 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2018) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
90 day: 20.19 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2019) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5

BZP T-100 (2020) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5

2012 Scion iQ - '12 Scion iQ Base
Thanks: 3,479
Thanked 1,395 Times in 968 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to BamZipPow
An Ultragauge may be more cost effective fer you...at 1/3rd the price of the Scangauge II.

UltraGauge Automotive Information Center and OBDII Scan Tool
__________________
Dark Aero-The world's first aerodynamic single wheel boat tail!

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2013, 12:39 AM   #5 (permalink)
Lots of Questions
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose
Posts: 665

Motor-Rolla - '01 Toyota Corolla LE
Team Toyota
90 day: 28.3 mpg (US)

Gaia - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 19.78 mpg (US)

Gaia - Round 2 - '99 Toyota 4runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 343
Thanked 101 Times in 79 Posts
Other than the price difference, is there any benefit to either one (i.e. different measurements, accuracy, etc.)? I know a lot of people have one or the other, but I have never read anybody give a good reason why they went with the one they did.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2013, 12:52 AM   #6 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
I'd rather get an adjustable grille block, allowing to cover most of the grille when possible while also able to avoid some overheating, but only partial because of the intake.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2013, 01:29 AM   #7 (permalink)
T-100 Road Warrior
 
BamZipPow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 1,920

BZP T-100 (2010) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 24 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2011) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 23.66 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2009) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 19.01 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2012) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 25.45 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2013) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 25.79 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2014) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 23.18 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2015) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 23.85 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2016) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 17.62 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2017) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
90 day: 20.78 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2018) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
90 day: 20.19 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2019) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5

BZP T-100 (2020) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5

2012 Scion iQ - '12 Scion iQ Base
Thanks: 3,479
Thanked 1,395 Times in 968 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to BamZipPow
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff88 View Post
Other than the price difference, is there any benefit to either one (i.e. different measurements, accuracy, etc.)? I know a lot of people have one or the other, but I have never read anybody give a good reason why they went with the one they did.
I purchased the SGII first and then got the UG afterwards. The only thing the SGII can do (fer some vehicles) is to put in custom PIDs to display things like the factory transmission temps which the UG doesn't allow you to input custom PIDs at all. I do prefer the UG over the SGII because of the number of pages and the amount of data one can see...up to 56 data displays.
__________________
Dark Aero-The world's first aerodynamic single wheel boat tail!

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2013, 02:04 AM   #8 (permalink)
Lots of Questions
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose
Posts: 665

Motor-Rolla - '01 Toyota Corolla LE
Team Toyota
90 day: 28.3 mpg (US)

Gaia - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 19.78 mpg (US)

Gaia - Round 2 - '99 Toyota 4runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 343
Thanked 101 Times in 79 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
I'd rather get an adjustable grille block, allowing to cover most of the grille when possible while also able to avoid some overheating, but only partial because of the intake.
I defintely plan on an adjustable (in fact I am reading Weather's AGB build thread right now!). As this is my first mod (other then my driving style) I just want to try it and I can use the knowledge gained when I do the adjustable.

But going back to my original question, should I do the full on top and the adjustable on the bottom?

Thanks for the input!
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2013, 02:07 AM   #9 (permalink)
T-100 Road Warrior
 
BamZipPow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 1,920

BZP T-100 (2010) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 24 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2011) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 23.66 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2009) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 19.01 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2012) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 25.45 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2013) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 25.79 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2014) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 23.18 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2015) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 23.85 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2016) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 17.62 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2017) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
90 day: 20.78 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2018) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
90 day: 20.19 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2019) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5

BZP T-100 (2020) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5

2012 Scion iQ - '12 Scion iQ Base
Thanks: 3,479
Thanked 1,395 Times in 968 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to BamZipPow
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff88 View Post
I defintely plan on an adjustable (in fact I am reading Weather's AGB build thread right now!). As this is my first mod (other then my driving style) I just want to try it and I can use the knowledge gained when I do the adjustable.

But going back to my original question, should I do the full on top and the adjustable on the bottom?

Thanks for the input!
You will have to try different ways to find out what's gonna work fer yer setup. I went with an adjustable grill block initially but had to go with a static setup as that's what my skill set determined.
__________________
Dark Aero-The world's first aerodynamic single wheel boat tail!

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2013, 02:08 AM   #10 (permalink)
Lots of Questions
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose
Posts: 665

Motor-Rolla - '01 Toyota Corolla LE
Team Toyota
90 day: 28.3 mpg (US)

Gaia - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 19.78 mpg (US)

Gaia - Round 2 - '99 Toyota 4runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 343
Thanked 101 Times in 79 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BamZipPow View Post
I purchased the SGII first and then got the UG afterwards. The only thing the SGII can do (fer some vehicles) is to put in custom PIDs to display things like the factory transmission temps which the UG doesn't allow you to input custom PIDs at all. I do prefer the UG over the SGII because of the number of pages and the amount of data one can see...up to 56 data displays.
Ok I will get the UG instead and see how I like it... I just know I want (and need) either one of them! It will be helpful to have a less expensive one anyway since I just started working for the first time in 10 months (ugghhh!) a couple of weeks ago. Saving money is the name of the game right now!

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com