Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-10-2010, 03:16 AM   #31 (permalink)
EcoModding Jack
 
nimblemotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 335
Thanks: 12
Thanked 58 Times in 40 Posts
My thoughts are to use water injection along with raising the compression ratio to a much higher value. This would normally cause detonation, but the water injection would prevent it. And also as you said, using a custom EFI system, you could run a very lean mixture at cruise speed and use the water injection to prevent overheating of the cylinders.

I think the downside (besides the added complexity for probably a small gain), is having to add the weight of the water and/or refill it often.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-10-2010, 11:39 AM   #32 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by nimblemotors View Post
My thoughts are to use water injection along with raising the compression ratio to a much higher value. This would normally cause detonation, but the water injection would prevent it. And also as you said, using a custom EFI system, you could run a very lean mixture at cruise speed and use the water injection to prevent overheating of the cylinders.

I think the downside (besides the added complexity for probably a small gain), is having to add the weight of the water and/or refill it often.
2 things to watch out for is running empty of water . though if you use a tank with a level sensor you could have a light lite up to show low water level,,needs filling.
The other is keeping the water jet clean and stop any build up , I never went into depth trying to find solution here , I just ended up checking it every 6months or so but maybe there some additive that would help there .
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2010, 03:57 PM   #33 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by nimblemotors View Post
My thoughts are to use water injection along with raising the compression ratio to a much higher value. This would normally cause detonation, but the water injection would prevent it. And also as you said, using a custom EFI system, you could run a very lean mixture at cruise speed and use the water injection to prevent overheating of the cylinders.

I think the downside (besides the added complexity for probably a small gain), is having to add the weight of the water and/or refill it often.
I found one paper on using water injection to up the compression ratio in the past and have never been able to find it again. The critical thing to making this work is ensuring all the water gets out of the cylinder between cycles(not all of it turned to steam). Water in the oil was another problem. I remember in the paper they used a flat 6 cylinder engine and had the exhaust valves on the lower side which helped in solving the evacuation of water problem.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2010, 07:24 PM   #34 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
I suspect micromanaging the water flow would be another solution. Keep the flow to the absolute minimum necessary for engine conditions. This would make it most water efficient and make certain all the water turned to steam. If there was water getting into the oil, it sounds like there was uneven/overabundant water flow.

Some sort of management system using exhaust gas temps as the input and water flow the controlled output would be ideal.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2011, 07:19 AM   #35 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auckland, New zealand
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It occures to me that there are a number of issues with water injection. I think that it's advantages are proven in piston engines. The expansion of steam due to heat is greater than the other gasses produced in the combustion process. Therefore the heat lost from the combustion gases is more that made up for by the expansion of the water.
But this is to a point. There will come a point where the volume of water will be too high and hinder the combustion process.

To use water in the combustion process as an expansion aid will require the carrying of a large volume, perhaps up to a quarter of the volume of fuel. This will add weight which is then to be carried, perhaps off setting a portion of the fuel economy gained.

I thought perhaps instead of trying to inject water or to suck with a vacuum line that the use of a Carburetor with finer jets than used for fuel could be employed to accurately meter the dose of water into the engine. Even though most vehicles use fuel injection systems, they still employ a throttle assembly as a primary means to control air flow into the engine. If this were replaced with a Carburetor that added water vapour a good result might be achieved.

If hot water is desired, this could be achieved by pre-heating it by passing a pipe through the top of the radiator.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2011, 11:42 PM   #36 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Water injection - EcoModder

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Water boiling dilemma: electric vs nat. gas Piwoslaw Saving@Home 16 06-29-2024 11:49 AM
Urban Cabin skyl4rk Saving@Home 1 08-22-2010 11:24 PM
water in the spark plug well Rainh2o Off-Topic Tech 13 12-21-2009 12:14 AM
Hot water! The Atomic Ass Saving@Home 18 04-16-2009 01:00 AM
OEM Air Injection, Yay or nay? Dane-ger EcoModding Central 11 01-14-2008 11:05 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com