Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-06-2013, 03:57 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 132

The Rental - '13 Hyundai i30
90 day: 37.55 mpg (US)

Autocross - '04 Ford Focus ZX3
90 day: 24.76 mpg (US)

The Wifes - '02 Ford Focus SVT
90 day: 23.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 48 Times in 38 Posts
Hatchback Vs. Sedan (why does a sedan have a better Cd?)

Why does the sedan get a better Cd?
if we look at a contemporary model, say the 2014 mazda 3.
Cd: 0.275 for hatch, 0.255 for sedan.
I would argue that from the B pillar forward the cars are identical. with the same cross section. So where does the difference come from?




A few ideas i'm toying with. with the sedan, quicker plan taper in the green house area allowing more air to fill in the wake, reducing pressure drag.

the other idea relates to the rear window and the reflex camber curve of the truck. As i see it, the air from the roof accelerates over the rear glass because it slopes faster than the ideal AST. I assume it stays attached because the transition is smooth and the angle is less than 22 degrees (22 deg triangle shown as reference) but a low pressure zone is created with a horizontal component leading to more drag(red arrow). But when the air turns the other direction at the trunk and slows down a high pressure area is created. Does the high pressure area cancel out the low? is the net effect less pressure drag than by just following the AST (as the hatchback does)? Is there anything else i can be taught about this situation.


on an aside. I've noticed many many contemporary 3 box vehicles all seem to have 22degree rear windows. are they all using the same effect?

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Thenorm For This Useful Post:
Allch Chcar (10-17-2013)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-06-2013, 07:31 AM   #2 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,217
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
The hatchback that you showed above is slightly shorter than the sedan, so it better follows the sedan before termination, whatever difference that makes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 09:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
It's important to be sure all other elements of the sedan & hatch are identical (eg. engine size/power, tire size, ride height), since these things will affect aero/Cd.

Sedans may not get the tidy flow separation that hatches do, but modern sedans aren't terrible in that respect. If you look at smoke tests in the wind tunnel, you'll see the trailing wake (filled with smoke) makes up a much smaller cross section than the hatch's wake.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
cyclopathic (12-02-2015)
Old 10-07-2013, 02:03 AM   #4 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,217
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
It's important to be sure all other elements of the sedan & hatch are identical (eg. engine size/power, tire size, ride height), since these things will affect aero/Cd.

Sedans may not get the tidy flow separation that hatches do, but modern sedans aren't terrible in that respect. If you look at smoke tests in the wind tunnel, you'll see the trailing wake (filled with smoke) makes up a much smaller cross section than the hatch's wake.
I believe that the Hyundai Sonata hybrid sedan has a lower Cd than the Prius.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2013, 03:31 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,998

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 47.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,711
Thanked 2,245 Times in 1,454 Posts
The longer trunk may also have an effect as a diffuser, read a diffuser with lower drag.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.

Last edited by RedDevil; 10-07-2013 at 07:04 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2013, 12:08 PM   #6 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
:-P

Seriously though, I had no idea that the Cd was so good on this car. Thanks for the post.
I never would have guessed the flow was so good with such a steep rake to the back window.

Aerodynamics is such a tricky thing.

Last edited by Cd; 10-08-2013 at 09:20 PM.. Reason: Everyone thought I was serious about the antenna.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2013, 12:23 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thenorm View Post
Why does the sedan get a better Cd?
if we look at a contemporary model, say the 2014 mazda 3.
Cd: 0.275 for hatch, 0.255 for sedan.
The reason is because the template is an optimum and or maximum air adhesion concept. Whereas wind tunnels and CFD models will illustrate (some) air flow over truncated or scaled down shapes and slopes.

Just because it doesn't match the template it don't mean it's a complete fail.

I would argue that the hatchback may perform better in real life with such things as cross winds over it's sedan counterpart. The air should be flowing over the hatchback with a little more stickiness than over the sedan (my current theory).

My other theory is the template works scaled down, but in a percent of efficiency scaled down. This particular example would put a big crack in this theory, and seem to indicate that scaling down the template has no adverse affects and in fact could be an improvement. Hard to draw wide conclusion off just one example, must use many examples to see a pattern.

Aerodynamics Photos by kach22i | Photobucket


EDIT:
2013 not 2014 model below
Jim Ellis Mazda Marietta | New Mazda dealership in Marietta, GA 30060 serving the greater Atlanta area including Alpharetta, Roswell, Buford and beyond
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html

Last edited by kach22i; 10-07-2013 at 12:40 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2013, 12:37 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
My guess, just looking at the pictures, is that the sedan roof tapers inwards at the rear. You could probably see it if you looked down from above.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2013, 12:38 PM   #9 (permalink)
fuel conserver
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 76

Civic - '99 Honda Civic EX
Thanks: 48
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
Cd factors in a cars cross sectional area, which in this case is the same at the front. The problem arises at the rear. The Hatch has way more area at the back, this ends up acting like a vacuum on the car because the air cannot remain in laminar flow as well on the hatch.
If Tractor trailers came to a point at the back, there wouldnt be much benefit drafting them, but because there is huge area at the back, they create a void of low pressure air behind them. In a similar way, the Mazda hatch is fighting this same fact.

Cross wind affect on a car also has to do with surface area, so its way more likely the Hatch will be more affected in a bad way, since it has more area for cross winds force to act on.
__________________
'02 E-350 7.3 Diesel (Work Van)
'91.5 Cummins 4x4 (Old Blue)
'00 Jetta TDI 5spd
'22 Tundra TRD OR
'04 RX330
'05 Tacoma 4x4
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2013, 01:05 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by E.Roy View Post
Cross wind affect on a car also has to do with surface area, so its way more likely the Hatch will be more affected in a bad way, since it has more area for cross winds force to act on.
I'd say the hatch has slight more upper side area, and the sedan significantly more lower side area.

Aerodynamics Photos by kach22i | Photobucket


The original template overlays don't exactly line up, but I bet the high points on the roof are the same. Small differences, but perhaps they could be redone to line up for a more accurate picture.

__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
aerohead (10-07-2013)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com