Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-13-2013, 03:59 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
RobertISaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324

MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mechman600 View Post
Just put oil all over your brake pads. It will have the same effect (both rolling resistance and stopping power) and will cost less.
and you can even vary the amount of oil for multiple settings of OHMAHGAWDWEGONNADIE.

or even make it self-replenishing by having a small squeeze of oil come out automatically whenever the brakes are pressed. they'd probably be the coldest disks ever.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-13-2013, 04:12 PM   #12 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I wish we had "No Thanks" buttons- I'd hand out several on this thread.

Don't be stupid. Drum brakes stop well and safely. They have less drag. They don't leave a dusty mess on the rims.

Four wheel drums: they'll put your head through the windshield if that's what you want:


Four wheel drums: watch your knees!


No, I don't want any forehead-sized divots in my all-steel dashboard, but I could put one there on the passenger side if you'd like:


How many of you have even driven a vehicle with four wheel drums?
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 06-13-2013 at 05:00 PM.. Reason: added pics
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 04:15 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
RobertISaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324

MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
i have no problems with drums in the rear... in fact, a lot of the times i almost prefer it.

but front drums? never would i choose that situation.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 04:27 PM   #14 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
i have no problems with drums in the rear... in fact, a lot of the times i almost prefer it.

but front drums? never would i choose that situation.
OK Educate me: why are they good on the back but not on the front?

And yet nobody has a rational answer for why.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 06-13-2013 at 06:34 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 04:42 PM   #15 (permalink)
NightKnight
 
NachtRitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,595

Helga - '00 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
Diesel
90 day: 54.39 mpg (US)

Mathilde - '99 Volkswagen Eurovan Camper
90 day: 16.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 314 Times in 187 Posts
I've driven all-drum cars before... both cable and hydraulic... I remember two things: never being able to get the adjusters right (manual adjusters), and they scared the crap out of me when they started to fade on a long twisty downhill. In one case, a buddy of mine plowed into me when his drums faded... me being there was lucky for him because the other option was an off-road excursion down the mountainside
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 04:51 PM   #16 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
How many are having trouble keeping their rear drums adjusted?

No mountainous downhills here + DWB = never even been close to brake fade.

Your buddy should have been using a lower gear.

I've read about simple steps to improve cooling to drums... not that I've ever needed to do those mods. That is the "issue" with drums: heat rejection not as good as disks especially stock.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 06-13-2013 at 06:09 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 05:19 PM   #17 (permalink)
NightKnight
 
NachtRitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,595

Helga - '00 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
Diesel
90 day: 54.39 mpg (US)

Mathilde - '99 Volkswagen Eurovan Camper
90 day: 16.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 314 Times in 187 Posts
That was when we were younger and more adventurous. And we have a lot of fun mountain roads around here. Yes, he should have been using a lower gear: good armchair quarterbacking. We figured that one out within a few minutes of exiting the vehicles, TYVM. Easy to come up with solutions when the brain isn't in panic mode.

In any case, now that I have had disc brakes, I wouldn't want to go back... so much easier to service (o ya, forgot about how freakin' hard it was to get the damn rusted-on drums off to replace the shoes!), and haven't come anywhere near the same "NO BRAKES!" feeling due to fade despite driving it harder. Not that I do that anymore...
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 05:25 PM   #18 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Yes, he should have been using a lower gear: good armchair quarterbacking. We figured that one out within a few minutes of exiting the vehicles, TYVM. Easy to come up with solutions when the brain isn't in panic mode.
So it's the brake's fault your buddy doesn't know the limitations of his equipment and how to respond rationally?

The facts remain about the pros I listed AND that drum fade resistance can be markedly improved- if that's how hard you are on the brakes.

I put a dab of grease or anti-seize compound where the drum seats on the hub; I haven't had to wrestle with any rusted-on drums that I did that to.

I want drums on the front of my Tempo, but not bad enough to do all that custom machining. Early Rabbits had drums all around.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 06-13-2013 at 06:05 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 05:40 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,796

Geo XL1 - '94 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 72.22 mpg (US)

Big, Bad & Flat - '01 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
I'm with Frank .

None of my big trucks have disc brakes.

Think, surface area

If drum brakes are good for 80,000 pounds semi trucks they're good enough for me.


.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redneck For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (06-13-2013)
Old 06-13-2013, 05:49 PM   #20 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I thought about mentioning big trucks but admittedly I didn't know if the newer ones were still drum.

I'd suggest for anyone who regularly rides the brakes until they stink to stay with disks. But then there are the rest of us...

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com