10-31-2010, 11:22 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 80
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
Heavier or lighter Flywheel to improve FE?
So going on from the other thread, this has crossed my mind since I'm in need of a new clutch soon and changing the flywheel out isn't that much additional work if I already have the box out.
Now I don't turn engine off during coasting, or pulse and glide but I do coast in neutral and idle to a stop light everywhere and anywhere.
So the question is, which flywheel is more suited? Stock, lighter or heavier?
Let the debate begin.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
10-31-2010, 11:27 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wisconsin, United States
Posts: 479
Thanks: 6
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
|
A lighter flywheel will improve FE because of the lower rotational mass.
|
|
|
10-31-2010, 11:50 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: belgium, wi
Posts: 262
Bus - '94 Ford School Bus huge Stupid - '01 Chevy Blazer LS 90 day: 21.38 mpg (US) hawk - '00 Honda Superhawk
Thanks: 2
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
|
This has been covered, but I will say what I know, not what I believe. A flywheel has a really important job that cannot be overlooked. If you dont have an engineering degree in ICE design, it may be difficult to choose the best flywheel weight for your engine. A flywheel must carry the momentum of the crankshaft with enough energy left over to compress the intake charge with a minimal drop in RPMs, which would negatively effect the engine as ignition would happen to soon, causing an overload on the crank bearing. What weight is that for your or my engine? I am not an engineer. this is what I do know...
Lightweight= better acceleration after the clutch has been fully engaged, engagement takes longer, as engine torque is decreased due to reasons mentioned above. Idle negatively effected, as well as cold weather starting. Shifting is tougher, causes more wear on trans. difficulty pulling taller gears at lower rpms.
Heavier= accelerates slower, engagement is faster. Shifting is easier, causes less wear on the transmission. Idle is smoother, cold weather starting is easier. Higher top speed achievable.
The info I have given covers stock (heavy) and lightweight (lowest allowable for 3 different vehicles that I have worked on). Is there a happy medium, yes. I am not an engineer, so I have no clue to what weight it should be.
|
|
|
11-01-2010, 12:29 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 28 Times in 8 Posts
|
i will tellm ya the answer in about 1 month, my 5 speed transmission and 4lb pound lighter flywheel are going in soon, so will tell you my f/e differences, i drive mostly semi town with not to much stop and go so let the measuring begin,
Last edited by pounsfos; 11-04-2010 at 12:08 AM..
|
|
|
11-01-2010, 01:39 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
DieselMiser
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
|
Proper fly wheel weight, or more correctly rotational inertia, is as important as a correct harmonic ballancer. Change it to a lighter one and your going to stress your crank, main bearings, rod bearings, wrist pin, pistons, and timing chain/belt. Its your engine do what you want
__________________
|
|
|
11-01-2010, 02:41 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Of Chicago
Posts: 127
Aveo - '08 Chevolet Aveo LS
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I'd put alloy rims, and lighter pulley set before I'd ever consider changing my flywheel... fly wheel is for engine stability. Pistons pump up and down, up and down, and there has to be some inertia to protect the bearings ncrap.
Do some underbody aeromods, grillcovers, moonwheelcovers, good set of spark plugs (cheap iridiums)... drive well
Given the desire to change it... heavier is good for highway pulse and glide, while lighter is good for city, due to less energy wasted via brakings...
|
|
|
11-01-2010, 06:10 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
The energy wasted via brakings can be fixed with a "nut" tuneup, though.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
11-01-2010, 07:05 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
I think a lightened flywheel is an area a dedicated modder can take good advantage of. The main reason for stock oversized flywheels is driveability and idle smoothness. But many hardcore modders don't hardly idle (because it is a complete waste of energy) and can learn new driving techniques, i.e. launching efficiently with a lighter flywheel. And may already time obstructions and lights to conserve vehicular momentum. As soon as you get off of idle and have the clutch engaged, the big flywheel doesn't offer any advantages and is holding your pistons and your car back.
If you P&G a lot then you are straining your engine against accelerating a heavy flywheel only to throw that energy away at the end of each shift and at the end of each pulse. It should be less strain to bump start a lighter flywheel as well.
I'm going to try a lighter flywheel in the tdi golf once I get around to fixing it rather than synch shifting it everywhere
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
11-01-2010, 08:39 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...an analogy:
• LIGHT flywheels are used on drag-racing engines for fastest engine speed rev-up.
• HEAVY flywheels are used on tractors for maximum low-speed pulling torque.
|
|
|
|