02-15-2019, 04:14 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,749
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,471 Times in 3,436 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rival879
The headlights turn off with the ignition, yes. Unfortunate, but how Subaru designed the lights. I'm in the same boat where I have to EOC cautiously or with just my parking lights on. The only lights that can stay on when the ignition is off are the parking lights. They have a dedicated hardware switch typically on the top of the steering column. I learned that soon after I bought my first Subie.
|
You don't want the key off the entire time the car is coasting, only long enough to kill the engine. Turn the ignition back to run once the engine has died. It will stay off until the clutch is let out or the starter is used.
My point is, your headlights probably only need to be off for 2 seconds tops.
Engine kill switch is the correct way to do this if you expect to EOC frequently. That would leave headlights on since the ignition isn't switched off.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-15-2019, 04:50 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 455
Thanks: 180
Thanked 101 Times in 77 Posts
|
If you can just turn off the key to do this, why do people install engine cutoff switches? It seems like a lot of work when you can just turn your key.
I recall asking before but this is only possible with manual transmissions right?
|
|
|
02-15-2019, 06:02 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeliveryGuy89
Hi!
I have a manual, but I'm not really sure how it works
|
Try coasting first - with engine on that is.
Put the gear in neutral, and just let it roll
You'll be amazed how far it can roll
Yes, it'll use some fuel, but you get a whole lot further than with engine braking.
Get a hang for how far it'll roll from your usual steady speeds, and use coasting from a lot further out instead of engine braking
Only accelerate up to the speed you need to reach the next turn / stop / lights / crescent of the road / top of a bridge / ... at a normal speed for this conversion point, then coast towards it, accelerate again and coast to the next point.
You're a delivery guy, this works well in town or suburbs
The idle fuel use makes coasting with engine on not really worth it under about 15-10 mph .
Downhill, if not too steep you can coast engine on in neutral, or put it in gear and use engine braking if it starts building too much speed (uses 0 fuel)
A combination of engine on coasting and engine braking when you need to stop, can improve your fuel economy a lot.
Turning the engine off after the acceleration phase, is the next level in coasting.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
02-15-2019, 06:29 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,372
Thanks: 324
Thanked 483 Times in 368 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taylor95
I recall asking before but this is only possible with manual transmissions right?
|
It is possible to engine off coast in an automatic or CVT, but it is presumably bad for the transmission.
In the Civic I used to have I never did any engine off coasting above 10 MPH for any distance further than 100 feet (i.e., parking lot, driveway).
__________________
2013 Toyota Prius C 2 (my car)
2015 Mazda 3 iTouring Hatchback w/ Tech Package (wife's car)
|
|
|
02-15-2019, 06:31 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
|
Or just buy an hybrid and let the computer do it all for you.
|
|
|
02-16-2019, 10:24 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 799
Thanks: 4
Thanked 66 Times in 58 Posts
|
I had to add my 2 cents worth.
My big bad old 2000 Mercury Grand marques was able to get 28/30 MPG at 65MPH.
This was at about 2 GAL per hour. (Via Scan Gauge II)
At idle it ONLY used .45GAL per hour. IF I could get a car that used that little fuel driving it would be getting 100MPG+.
SO killing your engine is a waste of time and dangerous. Leave it running at idle out of gear; you can then simply put it back in gear when you need it.
This keeps everything working, power brakes, power steering, A/C, all gauges and lights, and there is much less drain on the battery as even an idling engine can be charging the battery, and IF you drain your battery coasting with the motor off you then pay for a heavy charging load recharging it.
The one problem with this is some car and trucks seem to have a odd thing happen, IE my Mercury and 03 Crown Vic will maintain engine RPMS at or higher that the RPMS needed at speed. Yet my 1993 Chevy Van and my 2002 Ford Explorer will drop to idle when shifted out of gear.
So unless someone can figure a way to get these cars that will not drop to idle to drop to idle, this will not work as good as it will on cars and truck that do drop to idle out of gear.
As I have not considered using this I cannot say how many GPH it was using out of gear and still revving to RPMS, could still be much less GPH as the engine is free spinning and NOT under any load out of gear.
Rich
|
|
|
02-17-2019, 04:42 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,369
Thanks: 528
Thanked 1,193 Times in 1,053 Posts
|
The merc and crown vic could have lock up torque converters which could be unlocked. Been my experiences that Ford likes to downshift some trannies out of overdrive for any excuse hence with a locking tq the engine up rev.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
02-17-2019, 06:31 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,077
Thanks: 2,904
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by racprops
I had to add my 2 cents worth.
My big bad old 2000 Mercury Grand marques was able to get 28/30 MPG at 65MPH.
This was at about 2 GAL per hour. (Via Scan Gauge II)
At idle it ONLY used .45GAL per hour. IF I could get a car that used that little fuel driving it would be getting 100MPG+.
SO killing your engine is a waste of time and dangerous. Leave it running at idle out of gear; you can then simply put it back in gear when you need it.
This keeps everything working, power brakes, power steering, A/C, all gauges and lights, and there is much less drain on the battery as even an idling engine can be charging the battery, and IF you drain your battery coasting with the motor off you then pay for a heavy charging load recharging it.
The one problem with this is some car and trucks seem to have a odd thing happen, IE my Mercury and 03 Crown Vic will maintain engine RPMS at or higher that the RPMS needed at speed. Yet my 1993 Chevy Van and my 2002 Ford Explorer will drop to idle when shifted out of gear.
So unless someone can figure a way to get these cars that will not drop to idle to drop to idle, this will not work as good as it will on cars and truck that do drop to idle out of gear.
As I have not considered using this I cannot say how many GPH it was using out of gear and still revving to RPMS, could still be much less GPH as the engine is free spinning and NOT under any load out of gear.
Rich
|
In my Insight, idle is ~0.19 gallons per hour. I already get 100mpg cruising at steady speed. EoC helps further, but the better your gearing is, the smaller the gains from EoC. A vehicle geared such that it's at 90-100% load at your cruising speed would probably have almost no gains from EoC, aside from those from running at the RPM of peak BSFC. Might be another 5-10%? Anyway a good, modern CVT would probably see almost no returns from EoC, whereas a sports car with very short manual gearing would have a ton to gain from it. My previous Honda would cruise at ~4300rpm at ~65mph. Steady-state driving it delivered anywhere from 27 to 35mpg. With EoC I was able to break 50mpg on flat terrain a few times.
Dangerous though? Maybe in some cars. My car weighs in at ~1700lbs right now and stops fine even when the vacuum booster is empty for the brakes. It also steers fine without the electric power steering active... but the EPS actually stays active when the engine is off, so it's doubly a non-issue. My car is just about to turn 20 years old, and most new vehicles have electric power steering now.
|
|
|
02-17-2019, 08:22 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 799
Thanks: 4
Thanked 66 Times in 58 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko
The merc and crown vic could have lock up torque converters which could be unlocked. Been my experiences that Ford likes to downshift some trannies out of overdrive for any excuse hence with a locking tq the engine up rev.
|
I have seen what I would call a 1/2 downshift, the torque convertor unlocks and the engine spins up about 400/500RPMS, if that is not enough then she drops out of overdrive.
And again T double checked, my 2002 Ford Explorer does not hold RPMS coasting out of gear but drops to idle nicely.
Rich
|
|
|
03-22-2019, 10:59 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: GR, MI
Posts: 2
Evo8 - '04 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII SSL 90 day: 20.98 mpg (US) Red Wagon - '06 Subaru Impreza WRX Wagon 90 day: 26.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
You don't want the key off the entire time the car is coasting, only long enough to kill the engine. Turn the ignition back to run once the engine has died. It will stay off until the clutch is let out or the starter is used.
My point is, your headlights probably only need to be off for 2 seconds tops.
|
Agreed. I just don't like flashing my lights at oncoming traffic. If I switch over to all LED including headlights, I might change the power source of the headlights. If I feel ambitious.
|
|
|
|