08-07-2011, 06:51 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: houston
Posts: 374
Thanks: 3
Thanked 38 Times in 33 Posts
|
i want to see that electric power steering system
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
08-07-2011, 07:00 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryland
There are what, 11,000 insights out there? and with a 5 speed should get around 70mpg so 48mpg is pretty bad, altho this is not the first and I am sure it will not be the last.
|
10,000 miles/year @ 70 mpg = 143 gallons
10,000 miles/year @ 48 mpg = 208 gallons
208-143=65 gallons/year difference, or 1.25 gallon/week premium for all that performance.
I'd say if you have an interest in that level of performance, the fuel cost premium is very, very affordable.
|
|
|
08-07-2011, 07:12 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
The PRC.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
|
OT, slightly - does anyone know what the 3cyl TDI Insight gets FE wise - if it is still running ?
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
|
|
|
08-07-2011, 07:46 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
5 Gears of Fury
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,230
Thanks: 175
Thanked 176 Times in 137 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
10,000 miles/year @ 70 mpg = 143 gallons
10,000 miles/year @ 48 mpg = 208 gallons
208-143=65 gallons/year difference, or 1.25 gallon/week premium for all that performance.
I'd say if you have an interest in that level of performance, the fuel cost premium is very, very affordable.
|
I agree, that's the cheapest to run fast car I have ever seen. I imagine if the driver actually made the effort to get some good FE numbers out of it it would be in the 50+ range. Neat car, but poor attitude from the guy that built it.
__________________
"Don't look for one place to lose 100 pounds, look for 1600 places to lose an ounce." - Tony DeFeo
|
|
|
08-07-2011, 08:02 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
I'd say poor attitude from the guy that wrote about it.
|
|
|
08-07-2011, 08:15 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: houston
Posts: 374
Thanks: 3
Thanked 38 Times in 33 Posts
|
I don't read into write ups. All articles are written for specific readers for those magazines. I have read my fair share on the other side bashing the SUV's, Horse power lovers, and the such. It is best to just read them for the information and go on with life.
|
|
|
08-08-2011, 12:08 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Joliette. Québec
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
I would really like to see what numbers this car would do with an hypermiler driver!
|
|
|
08-08-2011, 12:54 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
5 Gears of Fury
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,230
Thanks: 175
Thanked 176 Times in 137 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deathtrain
I don't read into write ups. All articles are written for specific readers for those magazines. I have read my fair share on the other side bashing the SUV's, Horse power lovers, and the such. It is best to just read them for the information and go on with life.
|
I agree again. Magazines are written to be sold, so they will have whatever bias sells them to their target market. Good source of ideas, pictures, and other's creativity, not so good for anything deeper than that.
__________________
"Don't look for one place to lose 100 pounds, look for 1600 places to lose an ounce." - Tony DeFeo
|
|
|
08-08-2011, 01:46 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 719
Thanks: 154
Thanked 274 Times in 168 Posts
|
I see nothing wrong with that Insight. Different tastes translates into different undertakings.
Some purists might get offended, but the Insight ain't no classic car, yet...
|
|
|
08-08-2011, 02:53 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Engineering first
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 843
Thanks: 94
Thanked 248 Times in 157 Posts
|
They found the lightest weight, aluminum body, stock vehicle and stuffed in a reasonable, high-power engine. Their only alternative would be to find a 'kit car' with a reasonable body and though they exist, they are not stock like the Insight. By using the Insight body, they simply avoided the pain and agony of dealing with 'kit cars' that are more like a 'pig in a poke' than serious offerings.
Perhaps some of our recent Insight owners might contact them to see if the left-over, Insight parts are still available. It is a lot easier to rebuild a spare Insight engine and battery system than to deal with one already in the car.
Bob Wilson
__________________
2019 Tesla Model 3 Std. Range Plus - 215 mi EV
2017 BMW i3-REx - 106 mi EV, 88 mi mid-grade
Retired engineer, Huntsville, AL
|
|
|
|