01-28-2012, 01:01 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
|
How long until we get rid of the camshaft?
How long before we are finally able to get rid of the cam shaft and put the infinite possibilities of computer control into our valve timing with electro magnetic lift? With direct injection and stratified charge, we could then also tend to eliminate the throttle plate.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 02:43 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...I've wondered about that too, for years.
...if they ever migrate up from 12VDC electrical system to 48VDC as they proposed awhile ago, there's a darn good chance that direct electrical control of valve lift & duration could be 100% under computer control...unfortunately, it takes lots of CURRENT to make inertia "change" positions quickly, hence the need for higher VOLTAGE source.
Last edited by gone-ot; 01-28-2012 at 07:05 PM..
Reason: spelling error corrected
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 03:02 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
You'll never get rid of the cam because it will always be cheaper, more efficient and more reliable than stuffing magnetic coils in a hot vibrating environment. Throttleless gasoline engines have been around for years.
Last edited by tjts1; 01-28-2012 at 03:10 PM..
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 04:17 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
|
In terms of reliability, magnetic properties can be affected by the engine heat, so that is something else to take into consideration.
__________________
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 05:56 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 499
Thanks: 20
Thanked 46 Times in 33 Posts
|
Sendler, sadly it may well take a long long time.
OHC and 4 valve / cylinder were around at the turn of the last century (ie 1900's or so) and look how long they took to become more or less standard.
Will technology drive cars or will the demands of the car makers drive technology?
I personally think car makers will adapt when they have absolutely no other options...and even then it will be a tantrum session to get it all to happen.
Peter.
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 07:24 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 192
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1
You'll never get rid of the cam because it will always be cheaper, more efficient and more reliable than stuffing magnetic coils in a hot vibrating environment.
|
I would not say never, but trying to pull a valve almost a half inch using an electromagnet is a real challenge. Doing it at the speeds necessary is beyond available materials.
I designed an electromagnet once to pull 1600 lbs over a quarter inch air gap. It needed over 200 volts at 50 amps to drive it.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 07:37 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Gen II Prianista
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ballamer, Merlin
Posts: 453
Thanks: 201
Thanked 146 Times in 89 Posts
|
I guess hydralics are out of the running... too slow/complicated? ![Confused](/forum/images/smilies/confused.gif)
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 07:51 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
|
I think the biggest problem is that no one wants to put the energy into such a radical change for what is, ultimately, a dying technology.
__________________
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 08:03 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: saskatoon
Posts: 13
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
As soon as it's cheaper to do it differently.
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 08:06 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 192
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
|
Electromagnets and hydraulics are much more complex and expensive than some bumps on a shaft. Also camshafts have much higher mechanical efficiency.
Dual cams with dual VVT have much of the theoretical efficiency benefits of fully programmable valve timing.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|
|
|
|