Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-30-2017, 09:25 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Memphis, Tn
Posts: 463
Thanks: 320
Thanked 107 Times in 81 Posts
How much does weight actually effect fuel consumption?

I have heard that you could see a 1-2 percent drop in gas mileage per 100 extra lbs, but would the effect of 100 lbs extra really be that small? If the effect is that small, I think it would be safe to say that DIY weight reduction is not likely to make a measurable difference in gas mileage. If a car weighs 2,500 lbs, 100 extra lbs is 4 percent more weight. Obviously weight is most significant when accelerating or going up a hill, but it would still increase rolling resistance and friction in wheel bearings and such. What do you think?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-30-2017, 10:34 PM   #2 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Per EPA every 100# of weight reduction is about 1-2% improvement in MPG.

So, conversely, every 100# of added weight is gonna be 1-2% MPG reduction (or more).
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2017, 10:34 PM   #3 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,396

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,192
Thanked 4,380 Times in 3,354 Posts
This has been discussed more thoroughly before, but in general weight is not a very significant factor, but your mileage will vary.

Obviously, frequent stop and go driving will be more impacted more greatly by weight, but at sustained cruising, it's an insignificant factor.

Rolling resistance is not affected too greatly with added weight.

For most cars, the biggest drag is aerodynamic.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!

Last edited by redpoint5; 07-31-2017 at 02:51 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 06:46 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
I should make this my sig:

For a hypermiler, it's zero:

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post538484

The reason to save weight is performance, not economy.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 08:59 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,005

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 42.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,866
Thanked 2,501 Times in 1,547 Posts
Driving from Florida to Vermont with 500lbs+ of cargo in my Insight and pulling my trailer trailer with ~1000lbs in it, I averaged 57mpg driving through mountains, aiming for 60mph. I'm certain the trailer was not a net gain in aerodynamics, even though I cleaned it up pretty well. An empty car without the trailer probably could have achieved between 80 and 90mpg at those speeds.




Last fall when I picked up my tires, I averaged ~90mpg driving to get them (~50 miles) and got 54mpg on the way back, with speeds between 40 and 50mph.




So, really, doubling the weight of the car and pulling a relatively aero-clean trailer (which almost certainly still adds some drag) is worth a good bit less in terms of fuel economy loss than leaving the hatch open in the back.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com