04-30-2013, 12:42 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Your car looks ridiculous
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 96
Thanks: 23
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
How are these stock cars getting 60+ mpg?
So I was looking at the 2014 Mitsubishi Mirage links on the front page, and these cars are getting 60+ mpg absolutely bone stock, with the AC on! Impossible! Absolutely impossible! Then I hear about a couple getting 84 mpg in a bone stock VW Passat Diesel, with the windows down, and no engine off at red lights, not to mention the extra weight of an extra person, even in that little Mirage.
Am I missing something here? I'm in absolute disbelief.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 03:43 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 840
Thanks: 185
Thanked 167 Times in 117 Posts
|
I don't know if 84mpg in Passat is true or not but I know that newer cars have some gizmos build in and you don't have to think about killing the engine because it has start/stop function. Modern cars have cylinder deactivation (new VWs for sure), and modern engines are more efficient than older ones.
For example my wife's Mietek (MB w168 cdi) has 1.7 liter direct injection 16 valves diesel engine with 90HP like my Berta's engine. All the parameters are very similar, Berta have even slightly more torque, but it's an indirect injection diesel. And I have to fight hard to have 3.7l/100km (63.57mpg US) in Berta and it was fairly easy in Mietek with A/C turned on from time to time. On the same route. And Mietek is less areo than Berta, and it's automatic. But it's a next generation of diesel engine.
As you can see modern cars are more "eco" than older ones. We have lots of commercials recently of new cars and they say that for example average fuel consumption of new Citroen with 200HP engine is 3.4 l/100km (69.18 mpg US), what is hard to believe. But maybe? I would like to take that car for a spin and see on my own 
__________________
Quote:
Gerhard Plattner: "The best attitude is to consider fuel saving a kind of sport. Everybody who has enough money for a strong car, can drive fast and hit the pedal. But saving fuel requires concentration, self-control and cleverness. It's a challenge with the nice effect of saving you money that you can use for other more important things."
|
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 07:38 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,201
Thanks: 136
Thanked 2,821 Times in 1,980 Posts
|
I think that this has long been possible, which is why last year the government set new future fuel standards last year.
Frances Beinecke: Obama Administration Makes History by Raising Fuel Standards to 54.5 MPG
Posted: 08/28/2012 11:32 am
Quote:
The Obama Administration issued clean car standards today that will raise automobile fuel efficiency to the equivalent of 54.5 miles per gallon -- on average -- by 2025. That's roughly twice the mileage our cars get today.
|
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects
2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft
You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 08:02 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 840
Thanks: 185
Thanked 167 Times in 117 Posts
|
I've heard on the radio today that EU regulations requires that all new cars now should have average FE equal or lower to 5.0l/100km (47.04 mpg) and in few years (haven't heard which year exactly, probably 2020) that should be lowered to 4.0l/100km (58.8 mpg).
__________________
Quote:
Gerhard Plattner: "The best attitude is to consider fuel saving a kind of sport. Everybody who has enough money for a strong car, can drive fast and hit the pedal. But saving fuel requires concentration, self-control and cleverness. It's a challenge with the nice effect of saving you money that you can use for other more important things."
|
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 08:26 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,284
Thanks: 7,281
Thanked 2,238 Times in 1,728 Posts
|
I guess this goes hand-in-hand with his policy of "You can open a coal mind, but you will go bankrupt."
His solution was Fisker?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Xist For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-30-2013, 01:58 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324
MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
|
entirely possible.... under VERY specific and optimal driving conditions.
IIRC, the VW test was done out near california on the highway, but they only averaged 38MPH or something dangerously low like that. i believe they set the world record for the longest distance driven on a single tank of fuel at the same time?
this is assuming we're talking about the same car anyways.
__________________
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 02:29 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
Its completely possible, and not even under horribly specific scenarios. The new Mirage will have the best mileage rating of any non-hybrid out there. One of the members of EM actually had one for testing a while back and was able to do some speed vs mileage testing for us. At 50 mph you are almost eeking out 60 mpg.
Speed vs. mileage/fuel economy chart - Mirage 1.2L 5-spd

|
|
|
04-30-2013, 02:41 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324
MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
|
http://media.vw.com/newsrelease.do;j...ce-one&mid=138
there it is...
guess i forgot a few things.... not california, but still.
1626 miles over 3 days, with up to 14 hours of driving each day(542 miles a day), average speed of 38.7MPH.
of course, the "up to" portion is what makes this non-exact, but still shows that they were not only going significantly under the speed limit, but probably at/under the minimum allowable speed on the highway, assuming there was one.
__________________
|
|
|
04-30-2013, 03:51 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
Have you ever calculated your average speed? It's surprising how low it can be. If you cruise the highway at 60 mph, just the access road and parking lot segments at either end will drop it to 55. Stop for gas or restroom? That's easily another 5-10 mph lost. Meals, since they were driving all day? Another 5 or more.
__________________

11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
|