Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > The Unicorn Corral
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Closed Thread  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-24-2016, 07:02 PM   #11 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by acparker View Post
Tweaking all the parameters to get best performance is where it becomes pricey and time consuming. Many inventors have a terrible time deciding to freeze a design for manufacture.
The hallmark of a unicorn and still doesn't explain why no one can replicate the technology.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
 
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-24-2016, 07:15 PM   #12 (permalink)
Spaced out...
 
spacemanspif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Dirty Jersey
Posts: 748

The New Focus - '07 Ford Focus ZX5
90 day: 32.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 142
Thanked 205 Times in 149 Posts
I figured as much about the unicorn aspect, I was just wondering if the idea had any kind of merit. The website is How2SaveFuel.com but I can't seem to find the video on YouTube...

Lots of dead links on the site and the "upcomming calendar" on the right is all dated for 2009.
__________________
-Mike

2007 Ford Focus ZX5 - 91k - SGII, pending upper and lower grill bocks - auto trans
1987 Monte Carlo SS - 5.3/4L80E swap - 13.67 @ 106
2007 Ford Focus Estate - 230k - 33mpg - Retired 4/2018
1995 Saturn SL2 - 256K miles - 44mpg - Retired 9/2014

Cost to Operate Spreadsheet for "The New Focus"

 
Old 06-25-2016, 03:07 AM   #13 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts
The galactic douche nugget showed up on my facebook page....here's link to it I found. Needless to say.....so I won't.

 
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ChazInMT For This Useful Post:
spacemanspif (06-25-2016), Xist (06-25-2016)
Old 06-25-2016, 02:58 PM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 118
Thanks: 1
Thanked 33 Times in 24 Posts
On a positive note, he dropped the free energy claim...at least in that video. This kind of techno-evangelist hype is typical of the genre. Using glass canning jars instead of a purpose built shatter-resistant setup or a dry cell is also part of the appeal for that target market. Folks want to see bubbles.

In checking out some hho videos and sites, it was pointed out that with computer controlled engines, the benefits are short-term. Once the computer compensates for the imbalance, it negates the benefit. You have to have the computer tuned for the new mix. With the improved combustion, there is also a risk of overheating the engine before you get things tweaked. It is highly recommended that there be an exhaust manifold temp sensor installed.
 
Old 06-25-2016, 03:01 PM   #15 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Why why god why???
__________________


 
Old 06-25-2016, 09:30 PM   #16 (permalink)
Spaced out...
 
spacemanspif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Dirty Jersey
Posts: 748

The New Focus - '07 Ford Focus ZX5
90 day: 32.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 142
Thanked 205 Times in 149 Posts
Thanks Chaz, that the guy! Case closed, nothing but hot air apparently.
__________________
-Mike

2007 Ford Focus ZX5 - 91k - SGII, pending upper and lower grill bocks - auto trans
1987 Monte Carlo SS - 5.3/4L80E swap - 13.67 @ 106
2007 Ford Focus Estate - 230k - 33mpg - Retired 4/2018
1995 Saturn SL2 - 256K miles - 44mpg - Retired 9/2014

Cost to Operate Spreadsheet for "The New Focus"

 
Old 06-26-2016, 03:05 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 102
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
Use lots of big solar cells at home for the electrolysis and a high pressure commpressor to store the h and the o then use them in a car or truck for water vapor emissions. The whole setup would be fun and expensive to make, but would never pay for itself. Using the charging system in your car to run one is a joke. Water is made of h and o, but it's like ash in that it has already burnt.
 
Old 06-26-2016, 03:31 PM   #18 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by the hho web site
In checking out some hho videos and sites, it was pointed out that with computer controlled engines, the benefits are short-term. Once the computer compensates for the imbalance, it negates the benefit. You have to have the computer tuned for the new mix. With the improved combustion, there is also a risk of overheating the engine before you get things tweaked. It is highly recommended that there be an exhaust manifold temp sensor installed.
The typical unicorn "it wont work because" statement.
A few years ago it wouldn't work because the HHO would rust the exhaust manifold out and you need a stainless steel one, which is not true.
Those garbage HHO bubblers don't do enough to over heat the engine under any circumstances.
Plus if that much heat was being rejected through the exhaust and coolant system then its highly inefficient. "Over heating" is not a condition of "improved efficiency".
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
 
Old 06-26-2016, 03:34 PM   #19 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctmaybury@yahoo.com View Post
Use a high pressure commpressor to store the h and the o
A few years ago a retard HHO scientists Darwin awarded him self and injured 2 other people doing this.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
 
Old 06-27-2016, 02:56 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 982
Thanks: 271
Thanked 385 Times in 259 Posts
You don't need the compression step.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctmaybury@yahoo.com View Post
Use lots of big solar cells at home for the electrolysis and a high pressure commpressor to store the h and the o then use them in a car or truck for water vapor emissions. The whole setup would be fun and expensive to make, but would never pay for itself. Using the charging system in your car to run one is a joke. Water is made of h and o, but it's like ash in that it has already burnt.
Electrolysis is unaffected by pressure, thus, you simply use a version of the Hoffman Apparatus and let the electrolyser compress your O2 and H2 gasses to your desired pressures. There is the issue of the unbalance output of H2 vs O2 so there will be some valving at the least.

 
Closed Thread  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com