05-29-2010, 04:22 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Posts: 421
Thanks: 39
Thanked 96 Times in 69 Posts
|
Generally I would agree with you Thymeclock. I wouldn't recommend it or thought it necessary, but it works for this application. (maybe only this one) I drive a 3500 Savanna van for work that calls for 80psi rear and 65psi front. I simply don't have enough weight in this van to require these pressures and reducing the pressure has not hurt the mileage. Keep in mind that mileage is a non issue for me with this van and it's always bad anyway. The point that I was trying to make is that the ideal tire pressure for max. tire wear and longevity is not ALWAYS going to be max. sidewall pressure like many are saying. It may not be the pressure that gives the best FE either. Even tire wear is going to happen when the pressure is matched to the load on the tire so that all the tread has even contact with the ground. This may not give the best FE on a large tire. I have always run my tires a little over recommend psi on my cars (probably always will) and generally with good results. But, I think it's wrong to say that it will always make the tires last longer.
__________________
Almost all my driving is done 1-5 miles at a time.
Best short trip: 2.4 l/100 km, 3.9 km
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-29-2010, 10:43 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 471
Thanks: 15
Thanked 65 Times in 48 Posts
|
I have my tires at 54 PSI front and 52 rear. They're Yokohamas rated for 51 max cold.
EDIT: Those pressures are when warm. They're 51 cold on all 4.
__________________
In Reason we Trust
Last edited by AeroModder; 06-06-2010 at 10:47 AM..
|
|
|
05-29-2010, 11:24 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
I run them all at 50 right now... Once I get lighter rims and put my tires on them, and get heavy duty valve stems, 60-65 sounds better.
Keep in mind, I'm running LRC LT tires on my truck.
On the wife's Saturn, I run the tires at ~40PSI. They're "rated" for 35, I think.
I honestly believe the higher inflation pressure is the only reason I haven't had to change the front two, yet. They've still got about 2/32 on them, and the tire size isn't easy to come by used (in decent condition). I'm thinking about dropping her tire size to 185/65R15 instead of the 195/65s she has now, since those are easier to come by.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
05-29-2010, 11:55 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Posts: 421
Thanks: 39
Thanked 96 Times in 69 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeTreeMech
I have a '97 villager, and I suspect the tires wearing out in the middle has more to do with a 4000 lbs FWD vehicle than inflation pressure.
Will inflating tires to max sidewall increase longeviety? Depends on how you drive. And i beg to differ, just because you aren't personally paying the gas bill doesn't make the gas mileage any less important. All the reading and experience I'm seeing (my "fleet" clocks around 20K miles a year) says inflating to sidewall has no ill effects when using radial tires of good quality.
Also keep in mind that a RWD vehicle will naturally wear the rear tires in the center regardless of inflation pressure. why that is I'm not sure, just an observation and read about it in gov't manuals concerning tire inflation.
Everything I've read says underinflation is bad news, while "over"inflation is a mixed bag without the bad news. So tell me, which tire company do you work for? Something sounds fishy to me......
|
First off, I don't work for a tire company and I assure you I have nothing to gain by posting this. I'm a forklift tech running a service van. ( about 20k a year also and probably around 7000 lb) I'm running Nokian Vattiva E rates on my work van which are a very good tire and keep in mind I am still running 60-70psi in them. As for the mileage comment, my customers pay by the hour for my travel, not the mile and I'm not going to hypermile on their $ to save the company a little on gas. Believe me or don't, but it's my personal experience and it's the truth.
__________________
Almost all my driving is done 1-5 miles at a time.
Best short trip: 2.4 l/100 km, 3.9 km
|
|
|
06-06-2010, 10:48 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 471
Thanks: 15
Thanked 65 Times in 48 Posts
|
I went and checked my tires this morning. 51 PSI all around (sidewall max) and noticed some bubbles on 3 of them. Strangely, there's some going inward. The bubbles are small, but I'm still wondering if I should worry about them or not.
__________________
In Reason we Trust
|
|
|
06-06-2010, 02:48 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
Basjoos Wannabe
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
|
what is the sidewall rating on your tires? Sounds like the steel bands may be slipping. I've had that happen to me before, and the extreme end result is a weak spot in the sidewall that'll cause some shimmy in the short run and a blow out in the long run.
When you say bubbles, is that round bubbles, or enlongated ones?
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
|
|
|
|
06-06-2010, 04:33 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Camry MPG Modder
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: York, Maine
Posts: 56
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Ditto on "sounds like belt damage"...
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroModder
I went and checked my tires this morning. 51 PSI all around (sidewall max) and noticed some bubbles on 3 of them. Strangely, there's some going inward. The bubbles are small, but I'm still wondering if I should worry about them or not.
|
Irregularities in the sidewall surely means the internal structure has failed for some reason.
Hit and really bad potholes lately or any panic stops where you had locked up the tires?
I did that one nite at about 2am years ago in Rt 41 South in SC. Thought I was coming upto a fork I had to bear left on at about 70 mph, turns out it was a T-Bone and I locked all 4 wheels like the movies, stopped about 3 ft short of the stop sign and smoke from the tires engulfed the car. Made me chuckle at the time.
Over the next 2-3 months 3 of those tires failed. Belt separation.
One thing I do whenever I stop after driving long hwy distances is a run me hand of the tread surface to feel for high spots or hot spots. Gives great feedback on inflation and/or alignment. The warmest tires are always the ones with a slow leak or impending cord failure. But also the ones on the Sunny side of the car are hotter then the shady side!
Pete
__________________
2000 Camry CE 5 speed 128+K. Best 37.0, Goal is to break thru 36 consistently(Attained). New Goal 38.
ScanGauge II, Unibrow(1 wiper) Air Intake, Mud flap delete, 3.5+" Front Spoiler, Full Moon Hubcaps(Lost). Upper Grille block. (New and improved Fall edition)
|
|
|
06-06-2010, 08:05 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 471
Thanks: 15
Thanked 65 Times in 48 Posts
|
I do my best to avoid potholes, but I regularly drive over railroad crossings. No panic stops.
They're the elongated bubbles. Also, by sidewall rating, do you mean load rating? If so, they're 91.
I should have got the road hazard warranty when I ordered them, even if it could be a defect in the tires.
__________________
In Reason we Trust
|
|
|
06-06-2010, 08:48 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
Camry MPG Modder
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: York, Maine
Posts: 56
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
what brand/model are they?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroModder
I do my best to avoid potholes, but I regularly drive over railroad crossings. No panic stops.
They're the elongated bubbles. Also, by sidewall rating, do you mean load rating? If so, they're 91.
I should have got the road hazard warranty when I ordered them, even if it could be a defect in the tires.
|
If it looks like belt separation you have a decent chance at "defect" pro-rated replacement.
I mentioned the brake lockup skid because up until I did that my tires were OK.
Back when I had my 91' Toyota 1/2 Ton PU I had Michelin LT's. Expensive but worth it.
One time a local tire dealer talked me into some passenger tires on it as it was "just a toyota pu". About 1 week into the new tires I cranked it into a right turn and almost went off the road. Dealer got reamed by corporate and I got full towards the LT's.
Pete
__________________
2000 Camry CE 5 speed 128+K. Best 37.0, Goal is to break thru 36 consistently(Attained). New Goal 38.
ScanGauge II, Unibrow(1 wiper) Air Intake, Mud flap delete, 3.5+" Front Spoiler, Full Moon Hubcaps(Lost). Upper Grille block. (New and improved Fall edition)
|
|
|
06-06-2010, 10:50 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 865
Thanks: 29
Thanked 111 Times in 83 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroModder
I went and checked my tires this morning. 51 PSI all around (sidewall max) and noticed some bubbles on 3 of them. Strangely, there's some going inward. The bubbles are small, but I'm still wondering if I should worry about them or not.
|
When did you install the tires on the car?
How much mileage is on them since they were installed?
|
|
|
|