Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-16-2012, 09:52 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mechman600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,228

Fusion - '16 Ford Fusion Hybrid SE
Thanks: 190
Thanked 275 Times in 168 Posts
Stop spouting misinformation and scaring the poor guy!

Don't for a minute think #1 diesel is "like lower octane fuel" compared to #2 or one is better or more refined than the other. It doesn't have less lubricity. I will not harm fuel systems. It will not harm an engine if driven hard. It does not burn way faster.

Diesel fuel is diesel fuel, whether #1 or #2. Both are refined and sold by oil companies for use in diesel fueled engines. If there were issues with running #1, they wouldn't sell it. #1 is better for winter at the SLIGHT expense of performance. THAT'S IT.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-16-2012, 10:14 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
skyking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,399

Woody - '96 Dodge Ram 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 23.82 mpg (US)

Avion and Woody - '96 Dodge/Avion Ram 2500/5th wheel combo
90 day: 15.1 mpg (US)

TD eye eye eye - '03 Volkswagen Beetle GLS
90 day: 49.05 mpg (US)

Mule - '07 Dodge Ram 3500 ST
Thanks: 743
Thanked 528 Times in 344 Posts
Yep, slightly lower BTU and will run to much lower temps without turning to goo. I got #2 over in Idaho at a truck stop that had both. Over on the west side of the mountains we never see #1. It does not get that cold.
__________________




2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SRW 4x4 with 6MT
2003 TDI Beetle
2002 TDI Beetle

currently parked - 1996 Dodge 2500 Cummins Turbodiesel
Custom cab, auto, 3.55 gears
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2012, 10:15 PM   #13 (permalink)
Do more with less
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Eastern Missouri
Posts: 930

OD - '05 Ford Econoline
90 day: 18.64 mpg (US)

Joetta - '86 Volkswagen Jetta Turbo Oil Burner
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.71 mpg (US)

Benzilla - '85 Mercedes Benz 300D
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 177 Times in 112 Posts
Mechman
No worries about scaring me
I'm a mature, thoughtful, educated, conservative, thinker and have figured out which statements are chaff and which are the heart.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mechman600 View Post
Stop spouting misinformation and scaring the poor guy!

Don't for a minute think #1 diesel is "like lower octane fuel" compared to #2 or one is better or more refined than the other. It doesn't have less lubricity. I will not harm fuel systems. It will not harm an engine if driven hard. It does not burn way faster.

Diesel fuel is diesel fuel, whether #1 or #2. Both are refined and sold by oil companies for use in diesel fueled engines. If there were issues with running #1, they wouldn't sell it. #1 is better for winter at the SLIGHT expense of performance. THAT'S IT.
__________________
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” George Orwell

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.

The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed.”

Noah Webster, 1787
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2012, 10:17 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JasonG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / York SC
Posts: 728

05 DMax - '05 Chevrolet 2500HD
90 day: 18.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 120
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
My truck loves the bio, smoothes right out.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post

I wouldn't run No. 1 much with an old-style Bosch or Roosa-Master injection pump, but I don't think it will hurt HEUI (pumpa dusa) or common-rail injectors. these are not as dependent on the fuel for lubrication.
I've got to dissagree Dave.
The pumps his 86 have will push nearly anything fluid enough to get through the single hole hole injectors.
The VE engines (1999-2003) are very flexible as well, but the 4 hole injectors don't like crankcase squeezings and SVO too much.
The pump duse needs very clean fuel due to the close tolerances in the injectors but can run #1 or #2 or b80 with no issue. As you stated, lubricity comes from the engine oil.

The common-rails............. lack of lubricity, even a single gasoline "oops" can cause a catastrophic high pressure fuel pump failure. Look up HPFPF especially on tdiclub.com.
__________________



I can't understand why my MPG's are so low..........
21,000lb, 41' Toy Haulers are rough on FE!
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2012, 10:22 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mechman600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,228

Fusion - '16 Ford Fusion Hybrid SE
Thanks: 190
Thanked 275 Times in 168 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonG View Post
The common-rails............. lack of lubricity, even a single gasoline "oops" can cause a catastrophic high pressure fuel pump failure. Look up HPFPF especially on tdiclub.com.
Very true. Tolerances in HPCR fuel systems are ridiculous. And every single manufacturer has gone to HPCR, and if not they will soon because of emissions. There will be a lot more "oops" in the future. I call it job security.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com