04-14-2010, 10:12 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
The ideal vehicle
Instead of hijacking another thread I would suggest looking at the tactical portion of the high mileage vehicle.
Consider the 5 states of operation
1. Idling
This accounts for about 13% of all energy consumption in motor vehicles.
Idling in the conventional sense should be eliminated altogether. This can be done with smart charging systems and slightly higher capacity batteries.
Also needed is a start stop engine system that provides rapid restarts.
2. Acceleration
While this is the most fuel consuming portion of operation, it is also the point of best efficiency of the engine, when acceleration is done properly. An infinitely variable transmission allows for acceleration to occur at best bsfc point, unless the rate of acceleration is greater than what we would consider normal traffic acceleration.
3. Deceleration
Deceleration by my definition is when the drag of the engine is slowing down the vehicle. This is actually the second worse state of operation, only exceeded by friction braking. Fuel shut off in EFI engines allows fuel consumption to be eliminated in most vehicles, but the friction, reciprocation, and pumping losses contribute to significant losses even without fuel consumption. Even without fuel consumption deceleration is energy negative, meaning you are throwing away the inertia previously bought with fuel during acceleration.
4. Coasting
This is where significant improvements in overall mileage can be achieved. If done with engine off coasting results in infinite mileage. Even with engine on coasting can produce mileage in excess of 200 MPG, depending on vehicle speed and idle fuel consumption.
5. Braking
The absolute worst of the five states is when you take the previously fuel consuming acceleration event and waste it generating heat in brake drums and rotors.
Now lets look at the same five states with the ideal vehicle.
1. Idling
Does not exist
2. Acceleration
Accomplished with capacitive energy storage by several means, but needs to be primarily derived from recovery of any type of deceleration or braking event. In other words, whenever you must slow down you would be storing the lost inertia as a reserve for highly efficient reapplication to assist in restoring the prior inertial state before deceleration was necessary.
3. Deceleration
Should not exist. The engine does not need to be revolving during deceleration. Instead the inertia lost to deceleration should be stored to be reapplied in future acceleration events.
4. Coasting
Since coasting is one of the most efficient states possible, the only improvement would be to minimise every source of friction in the power train that would affect the coasting distance.
5. Braking
Although hyper milers avoid braking like the plague, in almost every driving scenario it is inevitable that you will have to apply the brakes. Braking is the hyper milers worst nightmare, when all of your carefully bought inertia is wasted to heat the atmosphere.
The solution to this is to be capable of storing that energy very rapidly for reapplication. In a panic stop a car can stop from 60 MPH in less than 25 revolutions of the wheels. That is a lot of energy to recover and very little time in which to recover that energy.
To understand the basics of vehicle operation is probably well know by most people here. The car of th future will be capable of very high rates of energy recovery during deceleration and braking. It will never waste fuel idling. It will use recovered and stored energy to provide almost all of the acceleration necessary.
Engine operation will be limited to only the best portion of the bsfc map. The engine will not necessarily be small displacement. It will necessarily be designed for limited high speed operation, with a practical RPM limit of less than 3500 RPM. Some form of supercharging, or turbocharging will be utilized a very small percentage of the total operational cycle for merging into high speed traffic, and climbing sustained grades at high speeds.
This applies equally to electric motors and batteries, if they are the energy source of choice, of course without any need for forced induction.
While for many this may seem like I am "preaching to the choir", the five states are fairly simple and straightforward. Understanding each individual state and the necessary improvements to really approach the point of perfection in vehicle efficiency is something that needs to be better understood by everyone, especially those who give it little consideration.
I understand the benefits of aerodynamic and rolling resistance improvements. In the end they will allow less fuel consumption per mile of vehicle operation, and in a system that automatically compensates for lower aero drag and rolling resistance the better it gets, the significantly higher the mileage.
regards
Mech
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
04-14-2010, 10:29 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ˙
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
the only qualifier I would add is the ideal driver should also be a goal, engineering/technology/automation is not the answer to everything, in fact it can create a situation where people unlearn and become more helpless (see Toyotas latest incarnation of the HAL9000).
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
04-14-2010, 10:45 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Left Lane Ecodriver
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
|
If the regenerative system in state 3 is powerful enough for everyday driving, and for hill descents, then state 5 should be almost as rare as idling.
The limited use of >3500RPM you describe is wise, as it's hard to achieve good efficiency at those speeds. Honda's VTEC and plenty of other variable valve timing schemes allow the camshaft to be optimized for low-end efficiency, while allowing respectable power above 3500RPM, where fuel economy is an afterthough.
The ideal vehicle, to me, has minimum aerodynamic drag, maximum engine and driveline efficiency, minimum rolling resistance, low mass, and a good regenerative braking system, in that order.
A hypermiler would find even the Insight's puny electric motor to provide adequate regen, so little energy would be wasted through friction braking. However, as hybrids become more advanced and cheaper, electric regen will become powerful enough to provide >90% of the braking for even the average driver. I wonder if the Prius is already there.
|
|
|
04-14-2010, 10:50 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb
the only qualifier I would add is the ideal driver should also be a goal, engineering/technology/automation is not the answer to everything, in fact it can create a situation where people unlearn and become more helpless (see Toyotas latest incarnation of the HAL9000).
|
I couldn't agree more dcb. It does seem like the more idiot proof we make machines, the exponentially greater number of idiots we create.
However when it comes to vehicles and driving, I would like to see the vehicle itself made to be of an inherently hypermiling design. I'm not sure if it is possible for most of the people I see driving on the road daily act more stupidly and with obviously no comprehension whatsoever of how to drive efficiently.
On occasion, especially when gas prices spike, I will rarely seen another car on the road that seems to be driven with some understanding of the benefits of extended coasting. Of course the other 99% pass you with the engine roaring only to slam on the brakes at the next red light, which was red when they hit the gas to swerve over in front of you so you have to slow down to avoid stopping altogether, when you could have passed through the light at your average speed otherwise.
regards
Mech
|
|
|
04-14-2010, 10:51 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
epic stock master
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: US
Posts: 377
Thanks: 19
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
|
i would first do a gravity and atmosphere delete.
|
|
|
04-15-2010, 12:00 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ˙
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
that would do wonders for your aerodynamic and and rolling resistance if you could pull it off. HAL already has some experience with atmosphere deletes
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
04-15-2010, 04:59 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: british columbia Canada
Posts: 102
Thanks: 24
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic
Instead of hijacking another thread I would suggest looking at the tactical portion of the high mileage vehicle.
Consider the 5 states of operation
1. Idling
This accounts for about 13% of all energy consumption in motor vehicles.
Idling in the conventional sense should be eliminated altogether. This can be done with smart charging systems and slightly higher capacity batteries.
Also needed is a start stop engine system that provides rapid restarts.
2. Acceleration
While this is the most fuel consuming portion of operation, it is also the point of best efficiency of the engine, when acceleration is done properly. An infinitely variable transmission allows for acceleration to occur at best bsfc point, unless the rate of acceleration is greater than what we would consider normal traffic acceleration.
3. Deceleration
Deceleration by my definition is when the drag of the engine is slowing down the vehicle. This is actually the second worse state of operation, only exceeded by friction braking. Fuel shut off in EFI engines allows fuel consumption to be eliminated in most vehicles, but the friction, reciprocation, and pumping losses contribute to significant losses even without fuel consumption. Even without fuel consumption deceleration is energy negative, meaning you are throwing away the inertia previously bought with fuel during acceleration.
4. Coasting
This is where significant improvements in overall mileage can be achieved. If done with engine off coasting results in infinite mileage. Even with engine on coasting can produce mileage in excess of 200 MPG, depending on vehicle speed and idle fuel consumption.
5. Braking
The absolute worst of the five states is when you take the previously fuel consuming acceleration event and waste it generating heat in brake drums and rotors.
Now lets look at the same five states with the ideal vehicle.
1. Idling
Does not exist
2. Acceleration
Accomplished with capacitive energy storage by several means, but needs to be primarily derived from recovery of any type of deceleration or braking event. In other words, whenever you must slow down you would be storing the lost inertia as a reserve for highly efficient reapplication to assist in restoring the prior inertial state before deceleration was necessary.
3. Deceleration
Should not exist. The engine does not need to be revolving during deceleration. Instead the inertia lost to deceleration should be stored to be reapplied in future acceleration events.
4. Coasting
Since coasting is one of the most efficient states possible, the only improvement would be to minimise every source of friction in the power train that would affect the coasting distance.
5. Braking
Although hyper milers avoid braking like the plague, in almost every driving scenario it is inevitable that you will have to apply the brakes. Braking is the hyper milers worst nightmare, when all of your carefully bought inertia is wasted to heat the atmosphere.
The solution to this is to be capable of storing that energy very rapidly for reapplication. In a panic stop a car can stop from 60 MPH in less than 25 revolutions of the wheels. That is a lot of energy to recover and very little time in which to recover that energy.
To understand the basics of vehicle operation is probably well know by most people here. The car of th future will be capable of very high rates of energy recovery during deceleration and braking. It will never waste fuel idling. It will use recovered and stored energy to provide almost all of the acceleration necessary.
Engine operation will be limited to only the best portion of the bsfc map. The engine will not necessarily be small displacement. It will necessarily be designed for limited high speed operation, with a practical RPM limit of less than 3500 RPM. Some form of supercharging, or turbocharging will be utilized a very small percentage of the total operational cycle for merging into high speed traffic, and climbing sustained grades at high speeds.
This applies equally to electric motors and batteries, if they are the energy source of choice, of course without any need for forced induction.
While for many this may seem like I am "preaching to the choir", the five states are fairly simple and straightforward. Understanding each individual state and the necessary improvements to really approach the point of perfection in vehicle efficiency is something that needs to be better understood by everyone, especially those who give it little consideration.
I understand the benefits of aerodynamic and rolling resistance improvements. In the end they will allow less fuel consumption per mile of vehicle operation, and in a system that automatically compensates for lower aero drag and rolling resistance the better it gets, the significantly higher the mileage.
regards
Mech
|
Yes, your thoughts make a lot of sence.
|
|
|
04-15-2010, 07:21 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,805
Thanks: 91
Thanked 460 Times in 328 Posts
|
There's really only a quantitative difference between engine braking and wheel braking. The heat and wear are just produced in different ways. Engine braking at least conserves the momentum of the reciprocating parts, and provides fine control. That may be more fun than necessity, but it can smooth out traffic flow. I think that variable valve timing is the best way to widen the efficient range of operation. Turbos make variable compression ratio even more important than it is anyway, and nobody has it yet.
|
|
|
04-15-2010, 08:52 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
epic stock master
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: US
Posts: 377
Thanks: 19
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic
|
i forgot that i drive with my window down.
|
|
|
|