09-14-2009, 03:33 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hamburg, New York
Posts: 104
Thanks: 4
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2000mc
speaking of design... you wouldnt want a windshield like the one in the original post. looks like a 90s chevy full size, now they might be reliable, but sooner or later youre going to want to open that hood.
|
Actually, the headlights and flat grill means it's a 88 or 89, 90-98 had composite one-piece headlights. also looks like 94-01 dodge dually rear fenders mounted on the front.
And, I'm pretty sure that although that windshield would probably help one's mpg's, it would dangerously decrease visibility where the front meets the sides and the cost of the custom 40-inch wipers would probably offset the fuel savings lol
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
09-14-2009, 03:37 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
My Goal: 35 MPG All Day
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 684
Thanks: 39
Thanked 36 Times in 25 Posts
|
Like so....
|
|
|
09-14-2009, 04:25 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Grasshopper
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 964
Thanks: 25
Thanked 30 Times in 25 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw
I asked around at the local body shops before doing my mods on my own and nobody wanted to have anything to do with it. They wouldn't even do something small, like removing the roof railing.
|
Ill take it a step further.
I probably wouldnt pay a shop to do it.
Instead I would ask around to see if anyone
needs a side job and then barter for some/all of it.
|
|
|
09-14-2009, 05:11 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
aero guerrilla
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,745
Thanks: 1,324
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomFact314
Like so....
|
I'd go with the skirts and roof extension. In (random)fact, why not go all out with the roof extension, with a hinge to allow trunk access? Also, an aggressive nose job would score points.
On the other hand, if you're mostly city driving, then weight reduction and reducing RR might be better.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be
What matters is where you're going, not how fast.
"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell
[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
Last edited by Piwoslaw; 09-14-2009 at 10:29 AM..
|
|
|
09-14-2009, 01:21 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northwest Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,006
Thanks: 8
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
|
Maybe something like this? I have one, the dash is like 3 feet long and not moveable, it is a royal pain to work on. Getting to the back of the engine requires laying on your belly and stuffing your head and arms back there, and I'm small too. If the engine ever goes, it would have to come out from the bottom.
On the truck in the original post, I wonder if the whole thing opens for engine access.
__________________
Winter daily driver, parked most days right now
Summer daily driver
|
|
|
09-14-2009, 01:23 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Your dash is longer than mine... and I have at least 2 feet from tip to windshield LOL.
There's this giant black panel in there that I thought about putting solar panels on, but the cost is still prohibitive.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
09-14-2009, 04:14 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Master Novice
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
|
The truck in the top picture is, I'm pretty sure, a screencap from the movie Tango and Cash.
Dumb movie. It did introduce the definition of the word "FUBAR" to everyone, however. So there's that.
Would I do that? Maybe, if I had the money. My truck is pretty upright, and a longer slope would open the hole in the air a bit more gradually. However, I wouldn't bother until I had already done a kammback to take full advantage of the smoother flow coming over and around the front.
__________________
Lead or follow. Either is fine.
|
|
|
09-14-2009, 09:28 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
A quote from Hot Rods article entitled " Wind Camp"
Concerning aero 'myths' -
" The biggie: windshield rake: According to Eaker, "Here's a myth I can bust. Once the windshield is past 45 degrees of rake-and many stock cars average like 60 degrees-you will not see an improvement from laying it down at an even steeper angle." We proved this on the Camaro, building a hugely sloped "windshield" out of foam core. It did nothing."
This quote comes from the guy that runs the A2 wind tunnel, and worked on the EV-1 aerodynamics.
( Am I the only one that would love to invite him over to our site ? )
Here is a link to the article : Car Aerodynamics - Hot Rod Magazine
BTW, Note that this is a several page article
|
|
|
09-14-2009, 10:57 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Cd - you have to consider that they were testing a stock car with a naturally high Cd, though, and no airflow improvement at the rear. Obviously, any change to the windshield angle would not alone be the end-all be-all of aero, but would work as an aide to keeping the flow smooth over the top of the car and off the boat tail, if it existed.
What I'm saying is that there might be more of a gain if the car had other aero mods.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
09-15-2009, 01:36 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
herp derp Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ
Cd - you have to consider that they were testing a stock car with a naturally high Cd, though, and no airflow improvement at the rear. Obviously, any change to the windshield angle would not alone be the end-all be-all of aero, but would work as an aide to keeping the flow smooth over the top of the car and off the boat tail, if it existed.
What I'm saying is that there might be more of a gain if the car had other aero mods.
|
didnt they get down to a cd of like .20 or some awesomely low number?
the backside of those camaros looks pretty aero to me, especially thiers that looks like it has some rake to the whole car
|
|
|
|