02-01-2018, 05:56 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 838
Thanks: 1,380
Thanked 209 Times in 155 Posts
|
INFINITI Reinvents The Gasoline Engine VC-Turbo
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mikeyjd For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-01-2018, 08:31 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747
Thanks: 75
Thanked 577 Times in 426 Posts
|
they've put it in to production? that's good. Now we can see what kind of longevity they will have.
|
|
|
02-01-2018, 12:07 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
Uh, an exhaust turbo-charger with controllable waste gate is likewise a 'variable compression ratio' combustion engine...and far less dynamically complicated.
|
|
|
02-01-2018, 01:27 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
|
I don't believe they have released any efficiency numbers yet? Bold claims without data at this point. It may very well be more efficient, but at what cost, literally.
__________________
|
|
|
02-01-2018, 03:05 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
EcoModding flying lizard
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 743
Thanks: 618
Thanked 263 Times in 175 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ksa8907
I don't believe they have released any efficiency numbers yet? Bold claims without data at this point. It may very well be more efficient, but at what cost, literally.
|
Personally I think car manufacturers should be spending MORE money on their engines/powertrains and less on "features". Things like variable length intake runners used to be commonplace, but now are usually cut out because it isn't "necessary". Screw that! Just think of how much BETTER it would be! I would gladly pay a few hundred dollars extra for variable length intake runners.
__________________
-Kaze o tatakaimasen-
Best trip in V6: 52.0
Best tank in V6: 46.0
Best tank in Mazda: 49.9
Best tank in CBR: 61.3
Best tank in SV: 83.9
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
You can lead a fashion-conscious horse to unusual-looking water...
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 03:40 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,245
Thanks: 65
Thanked 225 Times in 186 Posts
|
Fo you have any specs for these variable intake runners for the diy’er?
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 03:52 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man
Uh, an exhaust turbo-charger with controllable waste gate is likewise a 'variable compression ratio' combustion engine...and far less dynamically complicated.
|
The expansion ratio is much higher at low load this way. A normal turbocharged engine cannot have both high power and high mechanical compression ratio.
When the engine is at low load and not developing boost, the low compression ratio really really hurts efficiency because the combustion temperature is low and the expansion ratio is low.
It seems really really complicated but if it doesn't cost them much to build then I suppose there isn't a problem. I personally feel like a better solution is to rev an engine higher when you need power and rely on the transmission to do the downshifting to make that happen, instead of trying to maximize specific torque at considerable expense. Electric motors are the future and electric motors have great instantaneous response so you don't need that low end grunt.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to serialk11r For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-02-2018, 10:51 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
EcoModding flying lizard
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 743
Thanks: 618
Thanked 263 Times in 175 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by teoman
Fo you have any specs for these variable intake runners for the diyer?
|
Making your own set of variable intake runners is not really in the scale of the DIY'er, thus why it would be awesome for manufacturers to fit them to engines to begin with! It would be more involved than making a set of headers, so if you haven't done that yet, don't even consider it.
My accord V6 has a variable length intake . It changes the sound enough that it sounds like I have two VTEC transitions, one at 4000 rpm, one at 4900 rpm.
__________________
-Kaze o tatakaimasen-
Best trip in V6: 52.0
Best tank in V6: 46.0
Best tank in Mazda: 49.9
Best tank in CBR: 61.3
Best tank in SV: 83.9
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
You can lead a fashion-conscious horse to unusual-looking water...
|
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 11:27 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,245
Thanks: 65
Thanked 225 Times in 186 Posts
|
Do you know the input parameters? I.e lengths and rpm ranges etc?
I am pretty handy sometimes
Could you snap a photo of your intake?
Is it just the intake length after the air filter?
|
|
|
02-02-2018, 12:09 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daschicken
Making your own set of variable intake runners is not really in the scale of the DIY'er, thus why it would be awesome for manufacturers to fit them to engines to begin with! It would be more involved than making a set of headers, so if you haven't done that yet, don't even consider it.
My accord V6 has a variable length intake . It changes the sound enough that it sounds like I have two VTEC transitions, one at 4000 rpm, one at 4900 rpm.
|
I don't know for sure, but I am going to go out on a limb and say that with variable valve lift and cam phasing, variable intake length may not make a big difference anymore and not be cost effective.
__________________
|
|
|
|