08-03-2013, 10:08 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Aerodynamics rules
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Argentina Bs. As.
Posts: 63
Thanks: 9
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Kammback or rear spoiler?
Wich one could reduce more drag? What about the lift? Depends on the car?
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
08-03-2013, 10:59 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Sport Compact Driver
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lolo Mt
Posts: 623
Thanks: 56
Thanked 62 Times in 55 Posts
|
Looks to me like the aileron pictured would produce drag vs redusing drag of the kamm
|
|
|
08-03-2013, 11:20 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
herp derp Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
|
I think the ailerons you see on some vehicles are just for blowing dust off the back glass
|
|
|
08-03-2013, 11:57 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Aerodynamics rules
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Argentina Bs. As.
Posts: 63
Thanks: 9
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
The rear wing (down part) and the kammback (upper part) (both in red) have the same curve in this example, so i think the drag should be similar, (would have to add the cd of the aileron)
Now, should it decrease the drag of the car?
How much?
Should it have similar or equal lift?
|
|
|
08-04-2013, 12:01 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
The Kammback has an almost 270-degree effective range (top & both sides), whereas the Aileron affects only the top airflow behind the car.
|
|
|
08-04-2013, 12:17 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Aerodynamics rules
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Argentina Bs. As.
Posts: 63
Thanks: 9
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
yes, in the example i just want to know about the roof (the top) of the car. want to know about the difference about the kammback and the aileron.
|
|
|
08-04-2013, 11:54 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
|
It's a tough question because it is presented in 2D, real life and airflow is 3D.
If the Kamback has generously rounded shoulders then it should out perform the aileron.
However, if the Kamback has no sides or has 90 degree edges returning to the hatch, then my money would be on the aileron.
I like the aileron because it causes less lift and directs the air downward better using air pressure and flow differences. However there are bound to be some frightful vortexes forming if not framed with sizable vertical stabilizers (upright wings) which are not currently shown in either option.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects
2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft
You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-04-2013, 01:24 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viturro
The rear wing (down part) and the kammback (upper part) (both in red) have the same curve in this example, so i think the drag should be similar, (would have to add the cd of the aileron)
Now, should it decrease the drag of the car?
How much?
Should it have similar or equal lift?
|
Excellent diagram, and as illustrated the Venturi Effect and Bernoulli's principle will be at work with air flow though the narrow slot both accelerating the air and lowering the pressure under the foil.
The higher pressure above will be drawn down to fill the void below.
This will cause the mass flow of air above the vehicle to be sucked in a downward direction behind the vehicle.
Note: the sucking of air too abruptly behind the vehicle will cause turbulence, rotating swills of air (vortex) and other drag inducing elements.
If it cleans the debris off the rear glass in the process, all the better.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects
2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft
You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
Last edited by kach22i; 08-04-2013 at 01:30 PM..
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-04-2013, 09:04 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Aerodynamics rules
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Argentina Bs. As.
Posts: 63
Thanks: 9
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
So in your opinion, the aileron could have less lift and similar drag reduction?
I have problems to understand some text even using the translator.
|
|
|
08-04-2013, 11:08 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Aerodynamics rules
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Argentina Bs. As.
Posts: 63
Thanks: 9
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Now i made a new ''analisis'' of the aileron, i tough that the aileron should end at the same height, then the kammback and the aileron ''keeps'' the same quantity of low pressure between the back of the car and the aileron/kammback that kind of ''boxed'' air.
Then maybe get a closer comparison.
Last edited by Viturro; 08-04-2013 at 11:14 PM..
|
|
|
|