Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > DIY / How-to
Register Now
 Register Now

Reply  Post New Thread
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-20-2010, 08:32 PM   #21 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
On the turning off of individual cylinders, I wouldn't recommend it without a bit more thought.

On a fuel injection engine, the o2 sensor is designed to tell the ECUr if the engine is running lean. By cutting fuel to some of the cylinders, you are introducing a ton of o2. When that happens, the ECU decides it is running too lean and dumps gas into the cylinders. So much gas goes in that the cylinders walls can get washed, and gas goes into the oil. Why do I know this? I had a setup on my Explorer to shut off half the cylinders. Nice thing about it was it shut off one side of the engine and it was still balanced; ie no vibration. But my oil level slowly rose unexplicably until I figured out it was the excess gas. ( Funny thing was we were able to increase gas mileage 25% using this method.)

Long story short, the engine ended up slowly dying on us and finally quit altogether. I'm planning on trying this again, but instead I'll split the intake and exhaust in 2, or figure out a way to halve the signals coming from the MAP sensor and O2 sensor so that the computer doesn't detect a lean condition.

Anyone here know how to do that?

RIP Maxima 1997-2012

Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

Old 08-11-2011, 01:13 PM   #22 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
americasfuture2k's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: edmond, ok
Posts: 118

SLOLANE - '08 Chevy (Daewoo) Aveo5 SV
90 day: 30.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
any update on this?
If you cant fix it with a hammer, then you have an electrical problem


shutup, im working on it
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2011, 02:19 PM   #23 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fontana, CA
Posts: 167

Red Egg - '95 Ford Aspire
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

Dodge SRT-4 - '04 Dodge Neon SRT-4 2.4L Turbo
90 day: 26.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
@shadetree one idea to fool a computer with a V6 or V8 engine would to relocate the o2 sensor(s) into a stream that isnt being "tampered" with. This would involve pretty much designing a long tube header system for the explorer and letting the sensor sniff cylinders that are still operating in a range it likes. A really nice exhaust system would probably get you some gains just by that on the highway. The cheap way would to weld another o2 bung on just one side and run a longer oem sensor so they are both reading the same bank. However on paper it has its merits and downfalls. If you want to shut off cylinders when you want I think it would be a good idea to "rotate" them so there is no washing down and extra wear, so that kinda taxes the o2 moving idea too.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

engine kill switch

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kill switch for 88-95 Honda Civic/CRX/DelSol AndrewJ DIY / How-to 40 06-18-2012 03:13 AM
Geo Metro Kill Switch Idea? HotRod EcoModding Central 5 01-27-2011 06:13 PM
help W/ Remote Kill Switch Idea 93hatchDX DIY / How-to 21 07-31-2008 03:46 PM
DRL Kill Switch? gamer_jim EcoModding Central 8 06-05-2008 10:12 AM
Winter mod - heater blower integrated with engine kill switch MetroMPG EcoModding Central 3 12-31-2007 10:31 PM

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com