06-05-2014, 11:05 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
The 2002 Infiniti Q45 was a weight savings achievement. A lot of alloy and alluminuum in parts and skin.
Weight was 3801 lbs which was 500lbs lighter than the next car in it's class. It also had 50 more hp than the next car in it's class.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-06-2014, 04:14 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
|
The 1.0L Ecoboost is the base engine for the current European Ford Mondeo, which is basically a rebadged Fusion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kir_kenix
Imagine what a Fiesta or Chevy Spark would end up weighing...a very light and inexpensive .5L turbo would be adequate and return amazing MPG.
|
In other markets the standard engine for the Chevy Spark is a 1.0L, so maybe a turbocharged 0.66L such as the ones used in Japanese Kei cars might be a reasonable option. And there are also naturally-aspirated versions of the Ford 3-cyl 1.0L engine for the European Fiesta.
|
|
|
06-06-2014, 02:02 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurcher
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 333
Thanks: 151
Thanked 109 Times in 80 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kir_kenix
I think Ford (or any other company for that matter) needs a platform like the Fusion to work out the kinks in before transitioning into an ultra light Fiesta. .
|
And this: "Fusion sales of 295,280 vehicles in 2013..."
"Ford Fiesta sales of 71,073 vehicles for the year..."
( december-2013-sales)
Show off the modified popular car in which the average buyer might have some interest, not the niche-market car, which is aimed at who?
For perspective: "Sales of 763,402 F-Series vehicles in 2013..."
-mort
|
|
|
06-06-2014, 04:25 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,241
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,234 Times in 1,724 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mort
And this: "Fusion sales of 295,280 vehicles in 2013..."
"Ford Fiesta sales of 71,073 vehicles for the year..."
( december-2013-sales)
Show off the modified popular car in which the average buyer might have some interest, not the niche-market car, which is aimed at who?
For perspective: "Sales of 763,402 F-Series vehicles in 2013..."
-mort
|
So, how much more weight could they have removed from the F150?
|
|
|
06-06-2014, 05:45 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
They already removed "700 lb" by using mostly aluminum in the 2015 model F150. And they're actually selling them that way, not just as a design exercise. Looks to me like their priorities are right.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to PaleMelanesian For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-06-2014, 06:02 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
The F150 has a lot of cushion for putting more money into it since it sells ridiculous volumes, and it has a higher price. Doing this will smaller and lower quantity sold vehicles will be harder for a company.
|
|
|
06-07-2014, 01:55 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
|
Even if Ford would use fiberglass as a cheaper alternative to carbon fiber, at least in an earlier stage until they can figure out a more cost-effective way to manufacture carbon fiber components at a larger scale, they could already reduce considerably the weight replacing the doors, trunk lid, engine hood, front fenders, roof panel, among others. There are also some vegetable fibers as strong as fiberglass but more energy-efficient that can be used not just to cut on weight but also in the usage of mineral resources and the manufacturing footprint.
|
|
|
06-07-2014, 10:10 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,745
Thanks: 8,159
Thanked 8,942 Times in 7,384 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kir_kenix
I know it wouldn't be any good for towing, because the tow vehicle would be so light relative to the pay load.
|
Well, to start with you could get an aluminum/carbon-fiber trailer.
Ford needs to do something to stay ahead of companies like Inrekor.
What I dream about is Inrekor's flat-pack aluminum composite drop-in replacement VW Beetle floorpan under my 1958 Beetle body. Maybe full fenders and skirts in Coral Rot. 36hp case, Wolfsburg West reproduction Okrasa heads and Nikkies.
EDIT: Here's an example from their [3D scrolling] webpage.
Quote:
CHALLENGING LIMITATIONS –
Weighing around 400kg without the battery pack, the QBEAK is about half the weight of comparable cars in the same category, due to the amazing lightweight inrekor™ chassis and its impressive technical properties.
|
Last edited by freebeard; 06-07-2014 at 10:21 PM..
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-07-2014, 10:29 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
|
Replacing weld spots with contact-adhesives is also a good way to save some weight, and it allows a higher precision on the fittings.
|
|
|
06-08-2014, 01:22 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr
Replacing weld spots with contact-adhesives is also a good way to save some weight, and it allows a higher precision on the fittings.
|
Maybe, but welding does not ADD weight to what already exists; applied adhesives however DO gradually ADD-up, increasing weight...albeit not much.
|
|
|
|