Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-21-2013, 07:40 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mikeyjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 838

Matchbox - '93 Ford Festiva L
Team Ford
Last 3: 70.16 mpg (US)

Salamander - '99 Chrysler Concorde LXI
Team Dodge
90 day: 30.3 mpg (US)

Urquhart - '97 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 V6 3.4L DLX
Pickups
90 day: 25.81 mpg (US)

Smudge - '98 Toyota Tacoma
90 day: 40.65 mpg (US)

Calebro - '15 Renault Trafic 1.25 dci
90 day: 39.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,380
Thanked 209 Times in 155 Posts
Looking for drag effect vs mph chart

I know I've seen one or more, but I've come up empty so far in my searches. I'm looking for a chart that shows % of aerodynamic drag effect at increasing speed. Thanks.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-21-2013, 09:07 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 42.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
Right here on this site: Aerodynamic & rolling resistance, power & MPG calculator - EcoModder.com. Results are in a chart, every 5 MPH from 5 MPH to 200 MPH. If you want a graph, just cut and paste into a spreadsheet.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JRMichler For This Useful Post:
mikeyjd (07-21-2013), Sven7 (07-22-2013)
Old 07-22-2013, 05:06 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,895
Thanks: 23,972
Thanked 7,223 Times in 4,650 Posts
chart

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyjd View Post
I know I've seen one or more, but I've come up empty so far in my searches. I'm looking for a chart that shows % of aerodynamic drag effect at increasing speed. Thanks.
Hucho presents a Drag vs Top Speed table in his book.
It's for a particular range for frontal area and inertial class,but he makes a generalized relationship.
The most important criteria for us modders is that the unmodified vehicles top speed actually reflect full net power,just above the rated power rpm.
American cars are 'governed' with their gearing and won't actually achieve their actual power-limited/drag-limited top end.
European cars appear to be geared to actually take advantage of all available horsepower.
Once you're properly geared and have a bona-fide terminal velocity at rated power + 100-200 rpm,then any 30% drag reduction will net a 10% increase in top speed under standard conditions.
This ratio reflects standard passenger car radial tire technology performance
circa 1986.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
mikeyjd (07-23-2013), Sven7 (07-24-2013)
Old 07-22-2013, 07:00 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
Not sure if this is what you're looking for, but I posted this a while ago. It's from Cummins and for a semi truck, but you get the idea as the same principles apply.
__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Diesel_Dave For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-24-2013), mikeyjd (07-23-2013)
Old 07-22-2013, 07:14 PM   #5 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...industry "rule-of-thumb" is that HP(aero) = HP(road) at 55 mph...roughly.

...where (road) is tires & engine, etc.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 09:20 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mikeyjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 838

Matchbox - '93 Ford Festiva L
Team Ford
Last 3: 70.16 mpg (US)

Salamander - '99 Chrysler Concorde LXI
Team Dodge
90 day: 30.3 mpg (US)

Urquhart - '97 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 V6 3.4L DLX
Pickups
90 day: 25.81 mpg (US)

Smudge - '98 Toyota Tacoma
90 day: 40.65 mpg (US)

Calebro - '15 Renault Trafic 1.25 dci
90 day: 39.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,380
Thanked 209 Times in 155 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Dave View Post
Not sure if this is what you're looking for, but I posted this a while ago. It's from Cummins and for a semi truck, but you get the idea as the same principles apply.
This is similar to what I was looking for. The one I was thinking of was posted by Darin I think, and it displayed mph on a grid with aero % increasing incrementally. Something like 20mph = 30% and 40mph = 50% . It was a nice looking graph and I just wanted to have it on hand for reference.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 09:38 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
Incidently the chart also highlights the stupidity of the diesel pickup "power wars" where pickup owners think they need 400+ hp. A 80,000 lb semi truck only needs 264 hp to cruise down a level highway at 65 mph.
__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 11:21 AM   #8 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 668 Times in 357 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Dave View Post
Incidently the chart also highlights the stupidity of the diesel pickup "power wars" where pickup owners think they need 400+ hp. A 80,000 lb semi truck only needs 264 hp to cruise down a level highway at 65 mph.

One thing to keep in mind here though is the 400+ HP is used for a very short time, 250+ hp output from most regular pick-up or car engines for any appreciable length of time would result in a melt down, speeding ticket, destroyed property, and/or death.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 05:22 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,895
Thanks: 23,972
Thanked 7,223 Times in 4,650 Posts
incrementally

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyjd View Post
This is similar to what I was looking for. The one I was thinking of was posted by Darin I think, and it displayed mph on a grid with aero % increasing incrementally. Something like 20mph = 30% and 40mph = 50% . It was a nice looking graph and I just wanted to have it on hand for reference.
*The drag FORCE varies as the square of the velocity:If you double your velocity,you're hitting twice as much air,twice as hard.
The Power required to overcome the drag force varies as the cube of the velocity:When you double your velocity,you're hitting twice as much air,twice as hard,twice as often.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
When you know the 'starting point' for your car you can throw in a new drag coefficient,holding everything else constant and see how it impacts the road load horsepower for any given velocity.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top speed is achieved when power-train losses,rolling resistance,and aero drag equal the brake horsepower of the engine at whatever conditions you're operating at.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The mechanical efficiency of the power-train is essentially constant at full power so you can just discount the brake horsepower by that fractional multiplier,then any drag reduction allows a speed increase which balances the new aero load and new(higher) R-R value at the higher velocity at that discounted horsepower.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
mikeyjd (07-24-2013)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com