Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-30-2013, 10:07 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 29.5 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
I don't remember all the rationale and I don't have enough engineering smarts to understand why, but when Hot VWs magazine was building their "mileage motor" project, among the other changes they added to the engine was to build up its rotating mass. They added a heavier front pulley and a heavier flywheel.

In terms of drivability it's nothing but gravy: more rotating mass gives the engine more inertia, so when you hook the clutch up you're less likely to stall it out. And since your Caddy is a manual, you might miss that extra mass when you're trying to get the rest of the boat moving at red lights. It'll change the engine from feeling flexible and torquey to touchy and rev-happy.

Rev-happy is fun, but not for hypermiling. Granted, hypermiling isn't a CTS-V's mission, but there it is.

__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-30-2013, 10:23 AM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Mexico
Posts: 56

puntazo - '08 Fiat Grande Punto Sport T-Jet
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.94 mpg (US)

Pachanga ST - '14 Ford Fiesta ST ST3
Sports Cars
90 day: 28.59 mpg (US)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
I don't think it would be paying for itself. I don't know if it would be better if he's doing P&G, as it will be lighter and could gain speed faster, but I also don't know if a heavier car will P&G better, as it has more inertia as opposed to lightweight cars.

Anyway, I would like to try a lightweight flywheel just to do some quick gear changes
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2013, 12:17 PM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 32

Porter - '13 Ford C-max SEL
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
No great experience speaking here, but it seems to me that it doesn't matter where you store the energy, in a battery or in a flywheel, energy storage capability should reduce fuel use. Kinematically, it's the same idea as P&G.

However, were that the case, folks would be looking for the heaviest wheel/tire combos, as the roadwheels are part of the same rotational system as the flywheel, albeit with a variable RPM relationship. I see the opposite happening, judging by this thread. (the onein Success Stories about "prius-15s-better-than-aftermarket-17s-wrong-wheels-23509")

So is wyatt seeing wheel-tire differences, or is leanburn's logic (post 5, claiming low mass is better) at work here? If so, why is the result different from what kinematics leads one to expect?

HAve fun,
Frank, who on post #1, will remain linkless

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com