Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-19-2009, 07:29 PM   #11 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
jpgmtech -


I liked the Aurora's design when it first came out. Very close to the concept version. Are you thinking first generation ...


Curb weight 3,967 lb (1,799 kg)

... or second generation? ...


Curb weight 3,627 lb (1,645 kg)

The second gen will save you 300 lbs, but I have a hunch you are quoting the .Cd of the first gen. In either case, those are pretty heavy cars.

CarloSW2

.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	250px-1st_Oldsmobile_Aurora.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	10.2 KB
ID:	2776   Click image for larger version

Name:	250px-2nd_gen_Oldsmobile_Aurora.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	9.9 KB
ID:	2777  
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society

Last edited by cfg83; 02-20-2009 at 12:26 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-19-2009, 08:22 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Drayton Valley, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 52

duramax - '05 Chevrolet Silverado LT
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yah, I was thinking first-gen.

Weight difference is likely mostly in powertrain - second gen came with V6/4T60e powertrain in the base models. The first gen only had the V8/4T80e powertrain (very heavy!)
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 08:51 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gascort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 548

Gascort RIP - '93 Ford Escort Wagon
90 day: 43.01 mpg (US)

WifesCruze - '11 Chevrolet Cruze LT
90 day: 31.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
I saw one the other day and thought about how aero it looked...
Good idea to swap the powertrain; the northstars in those were AWFUL and every tiny part will break the bank due to rarity.

I do agree with Daox, however, other cars will be easier and/or cheaper.

My wife's intrigue is similar in size/comfort/aero and already has the 3.8.
__________________
Gasoline, Wind, Solar, Gravity Hybrid-to-be! http://www.scientificmethodfueleconomy.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 08:53 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gascort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 548

Gascort RIP - '93 Ford Escort Wagon
90 day: 43.01 mpg (US)

WifesCruze - '11 Chevrolet Cruze LT
90 day: 31.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
I saw one the other day and thought about how aero it looked...
Good idea to swap the powertrain; the northstars in those were AWFUL and every tiny part will break the bank due to rarity.

I do agree with Daox, however, other cars will be easier and/or cheaper.

My wife's intrigue is similar in size/comfort/aero and already has the 3.8.
__________________
Gasoline, Wind, Solar, Gravity Hybrid-to-be! http://www.scientificmethodfueleconomy.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 11:18 PM   #15 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Well yah for ultimate fe this isn't gonna do it.

But I like the project; the cars look great and the 3800 is a very efficient and powerful package. Too bad there isn't a 5-speed that would slide right in there. Man, if it isn't too much extra work, that's the way I'd go.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 11:41 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Drayton Valley, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 52

duramax - '05 Chevrolet Silverado LT
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gascort View Post
I saw one the other day and thought about how aero it looked...
Good idea to swap the powertrain; the northstars in those were AWFUL and every tiny part will break the bank due to rarity.

I do agree with Daox, however, other cars will be easier and/or cheaper.

My wife's intrigue is similar in size/comfort/aero and already has the 3.8.
I forgot about the intrigue...

Honestly this Aurora has been sitting behind the dealership snowed in and stuck in the ice for months. I couldn't help but think that the body spent at least a little time in the wind tunnel.

No, ultimate FE would not be the goal, but excellent FE for 3500lb+ sedan with all the bells and whistles would be.

My thinking is that the OEM's could have built much more efficient cars with more thought to aero and still have retained considerable passenger comfort and convenience.

I would like to make a project out of this just to prove the point... cost for me would be minimal, but it would take time...
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 11:55 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Drayton Valley, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 52

duramax - '05 Chevrolet Silverado LT
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
BTW, 3800 V6 w/4T60e transmission would constitute a considerable weight-loss for this car. The 4T60e came with a tall final-drive on some of the 3800's, running the engine around 1600rpm at 60mph (and a variable-displacement oil pump I might add, minimizing it's parasitic loss). The 3800 did have the torque to pull that. I could gear it even more aggressively in the future, slowing the motor down to around 1200rpm's. The 3800's parameters are readily available for engine simulation software, a custom ground camshaft, higher compression, etc relatively easy to do. I also do custom ECM programming - timing advance, shift-points, EGR, etc. are all fully configurable for me.

I'm not sure how much more weight could be removed (besides the powertrain transplant) but I'm sure something could be done.

There are a few manual transmissions that would somewhat bolt-in, but would require custom half-shafts and a couple of rethought transmisison mounts.

Where I would really need the help is planning and fabricating the aero mods.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 02:49 AM   #18 (permalink)
Custom User Title
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bozeman, MT
Posts: 248

Daily Driver - '02 Pontiac Grand Prix SE
90 day: 18.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Over on clubgp.com someone removed the 4T60e and installed a manual fwd transmission. I can't remember which, as it was a year+ ago I read about it. My opinion? he did it not for FE but for power handling and uniqueness. stick with the 4T60e, it works well.

If you can get the body for cheap and the drivetrain for cheap, I'd say go for it. I can get 35mpg with my Grand Prix with 5 people. I have the 3.1 with the weaker and slightly lighter auto. I've thought of swapping to the 3.8 just for the extra tq, but decided it only benefits me in town and at lower speeds. At interstate speeds the 3.1 works just as well and consumes less fuel than the 3.8.

I'd bet you could find a complete car that could do just as well without the mechanical work involved to get running. Maybe even something newer. I'd personally hold out, as the Aurora just isn't "good enough" in my book.

Price is right, any project can be a good project....
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 10:18 AM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Drayton Valley, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 52

duramax - '05 Chevrolet Silverado LT
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Good thoughts... I have to take a look at the olds intrigue again, it's a W-car like the grand prix, slightly smaller than the Aurora but still quite comfortable. And there is alot more W-cars around the auto wreckers than the Aurora.

doax, you mentioned you could think of several cars that would be a better choice. I'm open to ideas - any the fit the bill? Larger, well-equipped, and GM products?

The grand prix did roll through my mind as well - but i thought that the Aurora was a better starting point aerodynamically. I could be corrected on that though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 10:41 AM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 1,096

2k2Prot5 - '02 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 33.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
goal is cheap, FE and comfort? has to be GM... as a previous olds ninety-eight owner with the 3.8L engine, i can tell you you will not get good FE... i use literally half the gas in my mazda protege5 which has wonderful seats for the 6-7 hour trips to my parent's place. No sag-seat back-aches that you get from big cushiony seats (which are great for short trips).

If you want GM, eco and comfort you don't NEED a big car. Get a medium/small car with a 2L 4cyl and buy aftermarket comfy seats - they would be better than ANY OE seats.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electric car conversion: Project ForkenSwift MetroMPG Fossil Fuel Free 1041 07-28-2014 09:19 AM
EcoModding for Beginners: Getting great gas mileage. SVOboy EcoModding Central 55 08-20-2012 11:34 PM
10 years to build an electric car? - Blog article bennelson Fossil Fuel Free 8 01-26-2009 09:01 AM
Alt Car Expo Los Angeles 2008 cfg83 Events & Meet-ups 2 10-14-2008 06:21 PM
My First Electric car Experience WaxyChicken The Lounge 8 09-05-2008 08:46 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com