Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-29-2018, 03:20 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 25
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Window tinting is a mod to consider

When I bought my Rondo I was hoping the AC worked...it didn't. )^=
So I had the windows tinted and it made the interior much more tolerable on hot summer days. Add a good windshield shade (when parked....not for driving lol) and you can make running without AC much easier to bear by just using the fan.
Just a thought from the noob here.

  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dogman For This Useful Post:
elhigh (09-01-2018), Gasoline Fumes (08-29-2018), Lemmy (08-31-2018)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-31-2018, 01:40 PM   #2 (permalink)
Ecomodding Englishman
 
Lemmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 156

The Turdis - '05 Smart Fortwo Cabrio Passion
Thanks: 98
Thanked 48 Times in 32 Posts
And it makes you look gangsta!
__________________
https://themediocrecyclist.home.blog

2004 Smart Fortwo 0.7 petrol.
Motorbike.
Many, many bicycles.
2019 Volvo XC90 T8 - 400BHP plug in hybrid insanity.

All journeys I do under 10 miles are human powered - I make journeys, not excuses..
2019 mileage - 1900 by car, 7100 by bicycle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2018, 02:05 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 25
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemmy View Post
And it makes you look gangsta!
exactly
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2018, 10:06 PM   #4 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,175

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 269
Thanked 3,522 Times in 2,796 Posts
Some one else tested this.
They showed an average of 20 degree F reduction after the tint.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
Taylor95 (09-01-2018)
Old 09-01-2018, 07:32 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 455

Jeep - '97 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)

Blueberry - '07 Toyota Camry SE
Thanks: 180
Thanked 101 Times in 77 Posts
What kind of tint was tested? Can you give me a link? I want to use ceramic tint on my vehicles, which is the highest quality available. I've seen like up to a 40 degree reduction in heat advertised.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2018, 09:06 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 40.02 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
Of course there are limits - some municipalities police the window tint levels more aggressively than others. Others may not permit, for instance, reflective tint.

I've been reading about some metallic films that do a fantastic job of reflecting IR but the caveat there is they can seriously interfere with cellular reception. I've also seen mention of a so-called "ceramic" film - I would assume some kind of nanomaterial - that provides good IR rejection while still keeping the visible light transmitted - the number the po-po will be interested in - up in the acceptable levels.

I think the minimum light transmitted requirements don't apply to the back doors or rear window; obviously you would need to check up on that in your locale.
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2018, 09:21 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Joggernot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 449
Thanks: 1,748
Thanked 126 Times in 105 Posts
I tested 80% ceramic tint on my 2018 Honda CRV. The data won't format correctly, but here it is. NO tint on windshield! Front and rear sides and rear windows had factory colored window glass before tinting. Rear window didn't get the 80% applied. Big difference on the inside temperature even in the full sun, but didn't measure IR (no device to measure with). Interesting that on subsequent measurements of the windshield, the result were always zero for the inside UV.

Glass Measurements Outside Inside
Windshield Lux 1280 877
UV 7.5 0

Front Side Lux 1040 610
UV 7.5 2.5

Rear Side Lux 1120 150
UV 7.5 .5

Sun Roof Lux 1380 275
UV 7.5 0

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Joggernot For This Useful Post:
Taylor95 (09-06-2018)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com