Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-25-2017, 07:21 PM   #31 (permalink)
Just cruisin’ along
 
jcp123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,183

Beater Echo - '00 Toyota Echo
90 day: 42.67 mpg (US)

Hondizzle - '97 Honda Civic DX
Team Honda
90 day: 46.55 mpg (US)

Shaggin Waggin - '14 Chrysler Town + Country
90 day: 22.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 200 Times in 170 Posts
I've heard the wheel weight thing thrown around: yes, fractionally beneficial fo FE, but much less appreciated are the benefits to cutting unsprung weight: much crisper turn-in, better braking, and better suspension control once you eliminate deadweight. It's the only reason I'd consider some rims on my Civic instead of the steelies with what look like nice, aerodynamic factory wheel covers.

__________________



'97 Honda Civic DX Coupe 5MT - dead 2/23
'00 Echo - dead 2/17
'14 Chrysler Town + Country - My DD, for now
'67 Mustang Convertible - gone 1/17
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jcp123 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (10-28-2017)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-28-2017, 01:33 PM   #32 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,314
Thanks: 24,440
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
wheels

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcp123 View Post
I've heard the wheel weight thing thrown around: yes, fractionally beneficial fo FE, but much less appreciated are the benefits to cutting unsprung weight: much crisper turn-in, better braking, and better suspension control once you eliminate deadweight. It's the only reason I'd consider some rims on my Civic instead of the steelies with what look like nice, aerodynamic factory wheel covers.
You need to be acquainted with the concept of polar moment of inertia.In order to determine if lighter wheels will pay you back in savings,you need to know how the mass of the lighter wheel is distributed dynamically,compared to the existing wheel/tire combination.
There may be a You-Tube video out there somewhere,which will show you how to analyze this.Without the procedure,you'll never know beforehand if the wheels are a good investment.They're not all created equal,and some alloy wheels offer no weight reduction at all.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
jcp123 (10-28-2017)
Old 10-28-2017, 08:39 PM   #33 (permalink)
Just cruisin’ along
 
jcp123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,183

Beater Echo - '00 Toyota Echo
90 day: 42.67 mpg (US)

Hondizzle - '97 Honda Civic DX
Team Honda
90 day: 46.55 mpg (US)

Shaggin Waggin - '14 Chrysler Town + Country
90 day: 22.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 200 Times in 170 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
You need to be acquainted with the concept of polar moment of inertia.In order to determine if lighter wheels will pay you back in savings,you need to know how the mass of the lighter wheel is distributed dynamically,compared to the existing wheel/tire combination.
There may be a You-Tube video out there somewhere,which will show you how to analyze this.Without the procedure,you'll never know beforehand if the wheels are a good investment.They're not all created equal,and some alloy wheels offer no weight reduction at all.
If I ever get serious about it, I'll do that. For the moment the only reason would be if I moved to the snowbelt and wanted an extra set of wheels. Use the stockers for winter tires and an extra set with summer rubber.
__________________



'97 Honda Civic DX Coupe 5MT - dead 2/23
'00 Echo - dead 2/17
'14 Chrysler Town + Country - My DD, for now
'67 Mustang Convertible - gone 1/17
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jcp123 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (11-04-2017), Jez77 (11-23-2017)
Old 10-28-2017, 09:59 PM   #34 (permalink)
s_t
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 26
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
You need to be acquainted with the concept of polar moment of inertia.In order to determine if lighter wheels will pay you back in savings,you need to know how the mass of the lighter wheel is distributed dynamically,compared to the existing wheel/tire combination.
There may be a You-Tube video out there somewhere,which will show you how to analyze this.Without the procedure,you'll never know beforehand if the wheels are a good investment.They're not all created equal,and some alloy wheels offer no weight reduction at all.
A wheels weight distribution is a good point; one that is rarely mentioned. It will determine the torque required to achieve a particular rotational acceleration. However it is calculated using the Moment of Inertia - no need to go polar for this Weight closer to the axis of rotation will have less impact on rotational momentum than the same weight further out.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to s_t For This Useful Post:
aerohead (11-04-2017)
Old 10-29-2017, 06:40 AM   #35 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Hamilton OH
Posts: 27

Mr. Corolla - '02 Toyota Corolla CE
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
I boosted the tires to 38 psi. The car either handles better or I'm more careful (it does seem to make less noise). I can't tell if the mileage is better, though the weather has been colder and I've had to turn on the air conditioning to deal with rain moisture and use the brights more.

Someone mentioned Atkinson cycling... ballpark estimate, how much would a conversion cost?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2017, 08:58 AM   #36 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JockoT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654

All That Jazz - '06 Honda Jazz i-DSI S
Team Honda
90 day: 48.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcaud View Post
Someone mentioned Atkinson cycling... ballpark estimate, how much would a conversion cost?
More than you would ever save in fuel.
__________________
People Think They Are Thinking When They Are Merely Rearranging Their Prejudices


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2017, 09:26 AM   #37 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,096

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,907
Thanked 2,571 Times in 1,594 Posts
Minimum, you're pulling the head of the motor and putting in a new set of custom cams, plus an aftermarket computer and a tune, so lots of man hours and probably several thousand.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2017, 01:22 PM   #38 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,314
Thanks: 24,440
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
polar

Quote:
Originally Posted by s_t View Post
A wheels weight distribution is a good point; one that is rarely mentioned. It will determine the torque required to achieve a particular rotational acceleration. However it is calculated using the Moment of Inertia - no need to go polar for this Weight closer to the axis of rotation will have less impact on rotational momentum than the same weight further out.
Polar Moment of Inertia is a metric used by the Society of Automotive Engineers in their standard practice for all components of rotational mass.
Coastdown testing of vehicles cannot be accomplished without a full accounting of polar moment of inertia for all rotating components of the drivetrain.
It's just an engineering convention.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2017, 04:08 AM   #39 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 6

LeanMeanGreenMachine - '95 Toyota Tercel DX
90 day: 47.67 mpg (US)

TurboQuattro - '89 Audi 200 Turbo Quattro AWD
Last 3: 33 mpg (US)

DeathTrap - '94 Ford Escort LX
Last 3: 36 mpg (US)

CreamPuff - '96 Dodge Stratus
90 day: 27 mpg (US)

hoopdy - '88 Toyota Camry
90 day: 30 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Turtle mpg

If you want better mileage in town, 155/80/13 tires on Civic VX 13" wheels at 44-51psi and a k&n intake filter might help. Remove all sound deadening and unnecessary weight. Power steering belt and a/c delete will give a bit more power. Turn off the car at every light instead of idling.

Other than that, I think you'll need a smaller more fuel efficient engine. My 95 Tercel gets 36mpg driving really hard around town and 43-47mpg on the freeway. You could swap a 5efe or 4efte into the Rolla, but it would be easier to trade cars.

For an engine swap, I've always thought the turbo Firefly 1.0l motor might get a little better mileage since it's only 3/4 of an engine; haha.


Last edited by drew2000; 11-23-2017 at 04:19 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com