08-01-2013, 12:07 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,188
Thanks: 132
Thanked 2,812 Times in 1,974 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IsaacCarlson
It scared us pretty bad the first time it happened. It was winter and we were going around a corner at a reasonable and prudent speed and the back end came right around on us.
|
If just one of your tires is a little off, lets say one worn more than the others, or one tire is under-inflated on a FWD car, especially if that is a rear tire - then handling disasters are sure to happen.
It doesn't take much.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects
2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft
You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
08-01-2013, 01:42 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
|
If you were lurking around a mid-engine layout for fun, that would be prefectly understandable. But if you wanna improve the handling, there are other options that would be easier and more cost-effective.
|
|
|
08-01-2013, 03:00 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
eco....something or other
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
|
It is not oversteer exactly, it is more of a really light rear end not having enough traction to hold the road. Like I said earlier, My brother and I picked it up and swung it around to get it where it is now. The front end is much heavier. It doesn't help that the engine weight is semi-cantilevered. It has always been light in the rear.
I thought it would be fun to have a mid engine car since it is under construction already. I love the feel of a rear wheel drive compared to front wheel drive. It would be partly for fun.
I was thinking of keeping putting front hubs on the rear beam and extending the beams past the hub so there is about a foot sticking out toward the rear and putting air springs on them. That would support the extra weight and would reduce roll. I could also put air on the front end. I have some rear air shocks from the caddy that I could fab in. If those won't work, I could always put air springs in the front. I have them in the truck and they work wonders.
__________________
1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
|
|
|
08-01-2013, 03:09 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
You can conjure up many reasons to support the middie idea but fixing your car's weird handling isn't one of them.
|
|
|
08-01-2013, 03:46 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
eco....something or other
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
|
Hey Frank, what should I do? I know I need a front sway bar. I would like the car to handle well so I can have some fun when I want to. I am still looking for good mileage, so don't think I am going on a "fun run" brain trip.
I think it would handle better as a mid engine car vs fwd, but I need to make sure the suspension is working correctly first.
__________________
1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
|
|
|
08-01-2013, 04:01 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
First, why is there no front sway bar?
Second, get to a scale and tell us how much weight is on the front axle and rear axle.
|
|
|
08-01-2013, 04:57 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
eco....something or other
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
|
I don't know why there is no sway bar.
I can't really get it to a scale because it is taken apart in the shed. A sunfire is supposed to weigh about 2650 lbs. The published weight split is 63/37.
This puts the weights as follows:
Front: 1670 lbs
Rear: 980 lbs
__________________
1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
|
|
|
08-01-2013, 07:14 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
It came with a sway bar.
I know that 65/35 results in good daily driver handling.
|
|
|
08-01-2013, 08:46 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
eco....something or other
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
|
There is no evidence whatsoever of any front sway bar. The parts store lists a regular control arm and a sport control arm. Maybe the sway bar was on the sport version.
I have some time to think it over. I would really like to make it a mid engine, as you can tell. I have measured things out and it would fit perfectly. All I would have to do is cut the bottom out and attach the sub frame and struts. I need to remove some surface rust under the car anyway, so it would be a good opportunity to take care of anything that needs attention. My mother in law drove it for a while and she is murder on cars. She said, that before she got her van, she ran over a tree that was laying in the road!!!!!! That explains the control arm bushings that were ripped out of their sockets. Don't worry, I fixed those already. She also backed her caddy into my wood pile, then I hear VROOM, and she is ON my wood pile.......
Anyway, I am going to hash this over and see what happens. I may end up putting the motor up front for now, with a sway bar, and see how it handles.
__________________
1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
|
|
|
08-01-2013, 09:08 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
There has to be. FWD cars simply are not sold without them.
Here's what it looks like ( I only watched the first 40 secs).
Last edited by Frank Lee; 08-01-2013 at 09:16 PM..
|
|
|
|