Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-20-2013, 04:24 PM   #1 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Mini and MINI - Comparison

From here :

News : New MINI - a growing legend... - AROnline

How the super efficient Mini became the bloated "thing" that is the MINI



From the Mini to the MINI involved an 80% weight increase - really ?

Issigonis must be rotating in his coffin right now....

__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-20-2013, 04:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
NightKnight
 
NachtRitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,594

RippinRoo - '05 Subaru Legacy Wagon 2.5 GT
Subaru
90 day: 21.16 mpg (US)

Helga - '00 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
Diesel
90 day: 53.91 mpg (US)

Olga - '03 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon
90 day: 46.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 303
Thanked 311 Times in 186 Posts
I suspect the delta between the original Beetle and the "New" Beetle would be quite similar to the Mini to MINI delta. Porsche 356 to current Porsche 911. Original Fiat 500 to the current Fiat 500. Etc.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2013, 05:20 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: scotland
Posts: 1,429

The Mistress - '88 Bmw 320i Touring SE
Team m8
Last 3: 27.17 mpg (US)

Germany Beadle - '91 Mercedes 300td (estate, N/A)
90 day: 24.63 mpg (US)

The Bloodylingo - '05 Citroen Berlingo Multispace Desire
90 day: 39.77 mpg (US)

Shanner Scaab - '03 Saab 9-5 estate Vector
90 day: 26.19 mpg (US)

Clio 182 - '05 Renault Clio RS 182 182
90 day: 31.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 89
Thanked 89 Times in 74 Posts
I fear that there is an element of tint rose to them their glasses..

Original minis were so light due to being tiny, with minimal features etc- the current mini is a lifestyle accessory with all mod cons.

The original was excellently packaged, but very poorly executed. And the carb fed A series could hardly be called efficient

Current one compromises on packaging (only seats 4), but some would argue has a better build quality..

Odd that the height is pretty much even?!
__________________
My Blog on cars- Fu'Gutty Cars
http://fuguttycars.wordpress.com/

US MPG for my Renault Clio 182


---------------------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2013, 07:09 PM   #4 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Some of the Japanese K-cars are conceptually closer to the original Austin Mini than the current BMW Mini, and they actually can get as much amenities as any regularly-sized car.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2013, 11:44 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
Going roughly by those measurements, the footprint of the original Mini is (very roughly) 5.7 cubic meters, with 3.8 cubic meters within the wheelbase.

The current MINI has a footprint of 9.3 cubic meters, with 6.1 cubic meters within the wheelbase.

That's a sixty percent increase of the space between the wheel arches, for an eighty five percent increase in weight. Part of that increase in weight also covers the extra safety, the (much much much) bigger and more powerful engine, the (much) bigger wheels, the more complex suspension and the extra luxury and insulation that comes standard with the new car.

I'd say it's about right. This is similar to that similarly misleading comaprison between the Chevelle diesel and the Cruze diesel. They are in no way similar in size or passenger carrying capability, and a fairer comparison would be one with a classic car of the same size.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to niky For This Useful Post:
Cd (11-26-2013)
Old 11-25-2013, 03:46 PM   #6 (permalink)
Thalmaturge
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 1,156

The Tinyvan - '07 Honda Fit Sport

Spicy Italian - '13 Fiat 500 Abarth

eBike - '94 Trek Mountain Track 820
Thanks: 763
Thanked 637 Times in 424 Posts
Heck, even a Honda Civic has increased 30% in weight... go to wikipedia and check the oldest 1979 (2166 lbs) vs the newest 2013 (2815 lbs)... ~30% increase!

1966 Toyota Corolla > 1620 lbs
2013 Toyota Corolla > 2866 lbs

77% increase!

Of course the new ones are a lot more car, but then again I like the smallest, lightest thing I can find (wish I still had my Insight... ~1800 lbs).
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 05:57 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
80% more weight, and it still looks $h!!!!t€ ...
I'm already shivering thinking about the even uglier spin-offs Mini is certainly going to create starting from this one.

I bet Issigonis is spinning like a turbo these days.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 06:41 PM   #8 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Actually the only new Mini models I dislike are the 2-seater Roadster and Coupé, and that Paceman. Even the Countryman, which is too large for a Mini, has a proportional design.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 04:47 AM   #9 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (11-26-2013), wdb (11-26-2013)
Old 11-26-2013, 08:47 AM   #10 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I'll take the one on the right, please.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com