12-10-2014, 04:01 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,544
Thanks: 8,086
Thanked 8,880 Times in 7,328 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
I really like what they've done,but another,deeper investigation needs to be made,investigating the technology as an aerodynamic 'system' of mirror and host vehicle together.
|
Agreed. I'd start with a generic stalk against a flat wall, in order to not particularize the result to any vehicle. And also combine the Maclaren ventilator into the unit.
Vekke -- My guess would be that there is a lot of distortion, viewing through the compound-curved plastic. What do you see?
My home-brew mirror mount causes a lot of vibration, to where I put my thumb on the mirror to de-blur the view. How is it for vibration?
Smokeduv -- That sounds like it should work, but the camera really only needs a pin-hole to view through.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
12-10-2014, 04:46 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Mexico
Posts: 56
Thanks: 18
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
Agreed. I'd start with a generic stalk against a flat wall, in order to not particularize the result to any vehicle. And also combine the Maclaren ventilator into the unit.
Vekke -- My guess would be that there is a lot of distortion, viewing through the compound-curved plastic. What do you see?
My home-brew mirror mount causes a lot of vibration, to where I put my thumb on the mirror to de-blur the view. How is it for vibration?
Smokeduv -- That sounds like it should work, but the camera really only needs a pin-hole to view through.
|
Then it would be even easier
I have some very tiny cameras from some medical devices. I might try some... They are not HD, but have a very good quality for a 5 inches display
|
|
|
12-10-2014, 06:27 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
Video mirror cameras need to handle a wide range of light levels. Having about 90-100 degrees of view would be about ideal. My cameras are anything but HD (I think they are ~360 pixels in the vertical axis?) and that is fine; though more is better.
Having a point of visual reference in the video mirror view is critical. And I recommend a 7"-9" monitor; especially if you have them located away from the driver.
|
|
|
12-15-2014, 09:21 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Eco Rodder
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 105
Thanks: 25
Thanked 52 Times in 34 Posts
|
I just read the California rule and while it says you need at least two mirrors that can see the highway 200 feet behind the vehicle and one must be on the left, it does not say they need to be outside.
My old Chevelle has one of those interior mirrors with 5 individual mirrors across maybe 30". The first section or individual mirror is clearly to the left of the center of the car so "technically", this should comply.
What does a fix-it ticket cost these days? I may risk it.
|
|
|
12-15-2014, 09:49 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
|
While I love the McLaren vented mirrors, my car already has a cabin air intake...
A design I always wondered about after seeing the Lexus LFA was a mirror sitting right next to the A-pillar with a long housing extending ahead of the windshield. That would presumably weaken the A pillar vortices.
|
|
|
12-15-2014, 11:23 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
Spaced out...
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Dirty Jersey
Posts: 748
Thanks: 142
Thanked 205 Times in 149 Posts
|
I saw a re-run of the original "The Fast and the Furious" a while ago and noticed that one of the cars had goofy side mirrors. So I thought I might share on this thread as its about better side mirrors, not really sure how much better these would be but wanted to bring them up anyway. Pics:
Apparently they are called BOMEX mirrors (not sure if it's the brand or style) but found them online for $260
Bomex 96-00 Toyota Rav4 3 dr Aero Mirrors Manual(S-038)
Could be a style worth replicating IF its a good compromise between OEM and none at all....
__________________
-Mike
2007 Ford Focus ZX5 - 91k - SGII, pending upper and lower grill bocks - auto trans
1987 Monte Carlo SS - 5.3/4L80E swap - 13.67 @ 106
2007 Ford Focus Estate - 230k - 33mpg - Retired 4/2018
1995 Saturn SL2 - 256K miles - 44mpg - Retired 9/2014
Cost to Operate Spreadsheet for "The New Focus"
|
|
|
12-16-2014, 02:40 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
A-pillar
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r
While I love the McLaren vented mirrors, my car already has a cabin air intake...
A design I always wondered about after seeing the Lexus LFA was a mirror sitting right next to the A-pillar with a long housing extending ahead of the windshield. That would presumably weaken the A pillar vortices.
|
*Some of the low-drag concepts place the mirror below the cowl level to get them below that accelerated A-pillar flow.(Probe IV)
*Ford has done this with their F-150,which has a special cut down side windows for which to see the lowered units.
*Subaru moved their XT mirrors out 80mm from the body,into slower air and killed most of the interference.
*Ditto with GM Impact.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-16-2014, 03:44 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
I had read in the past that Ferrari moved the mirrors high on the A pillar for lower drag on the Testarossa, but that cars drag was such a mess, that it makes me wonder if they made the effort.
Sure enough, I found this info : " The early Testarossas were fitted with the famous single high mirror, also known as the "flying mirror". The strange location of this mirror was related to a European law regarding the external rear view mirror, which was interpreted by the designer as the need of having 100% rearward visibility. As this simply was an incorrect interpretation of the law, Ferrari later decided (also after many complaints about the single high mirror) to use double low mirrors, first shown on the Geneva show in 1986. The first cars having double low mirrors were s/n 67079 for Euro versions and s/n 67487 for US versions (first US car with Model Year 1987). "
here : Red Headed - Testarossa
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-22-2014, 04:48 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
Mechanical engineer
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,272
Thanks: 270
Thanked 841 Times in 414 Posts
|
My mirror vison was not perfect, but good enough on proto parts. Biggest problem was that all 3 sides were joined to together, so if the sun was from behind it gave some reflections. Also the surface was not fully mirror due to low budjet and my oven manufacturing and vacuum forming methods...
I did make tuft testing and tufts were fully attached .
Solution is to have similar cover, but not make it teardrop in car heigth (Z) direction. So only teardrop the mirror cover in cars width direction (Y).
Mirror footage is starts at 5.20-
It is positioned high to avoid that high speed air flow at A-pillar corner but also the have it at my eye level
Quite back to get wider look angle and more cool air flow for the driver
My mirror is wide angle so I do not have any blind spots there.
I can make a improved version if you would like to buy them?
I did also make some calculations of the mirror drag:
Frontal area is about 75mmx105mm=0,00788m2 vs regular Lupo 3L mirror (this is smaller than most mirrors already) 120mmx190mm=0,0228m2. That is 2,8 times smaller
This design will lower your fuel consumption about 2-6% depending on the car.
Those race type mirrors that hang at some distance from body are 5 times worse visibility wise compared to my setup. My customers A2 has those and there is very big blind spot there.
Mirror frontal area is pretty much same.
Last edited by Vekke; 12-23-2014 at 12:52 PM..
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Vekke For This Useful Post:
|
|
|