Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-22-2010, 06:30 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JasonG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / York SC
Posts: 728

05 DMax - '05 Chevrolet 2500HD
90 day: 18.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 120
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
Gasoline Fumes and I have discussed this at length,
We will be unable to help you without pictures of the subject in both mud and snow conditions
Poised next to a much smaller vehicle would be helpful as well

__________________



I can't understand why my MPG's are so low..........
21,000lb, 41' Toy Haulers are rough on FE!
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-22-2010, 06:41 PM   #12 (permalink)
I have to start over?
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 214

Big inefficient truck - '94 Dodge Ram 2500
90 day: 12.1 mpg (US)

Honda Civic - '84 Honda Civic DX Hatchback
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
HAHAHA a unimog! That's awesome! Crazy awesome. And crazy

You could probably increase output and decrease EGTs by upping the injection timing (advance). The way I understand that is that it makes more of the fuel burn in the cylinder and less on the turbo so the EGTs are cooler but the cylinder temps will get a little hotter. Not sure how it would effect FE.

Make sure your injectors are in tip-top shape. I'm not sure how many miles (Km?) are on the stock sticks but with an old 70's diesel, I'm sure they could use some help. Pop-off testing will let you know what shape they are in.

Those recommendations are actually from plenty of lurking over at cumminsforum.com (2nd gen) researching MY diesel engine. If yours has indirect injection... well, I'm not sure.

Of course, you could also change the rear end ratio (like mentioned in that link there) but that may or may not be practical.

Keep us updated and let us know what its FE turns out to be "stock." Should be worth a good laugh
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2010, 09:26 PM   #13 (permalink)
I have to start over?
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 214

Big inefficient truck - '94 Dodge Ram 2500
90 day: 12.1 mpg (US)

Honda Civic - '84 Honda Civic DX Hatchback
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Another thing I forgot: try a BHAF. It isn't as cheap as a stock filter, but it breathes so much better. I ordered one from fleetfilter.com for about $50, part number 2790

http://dodgetrucks.org/photopost/dat...talled-med.jpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2010, 12:29 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
So what are you going to use this vehicle for and why do you want it to go so fast? if I was driving an 8 ton vehicle that could crush the average SUV, I would drive however slow I wanted.
If you want more power you might check in to how many of the pumps and other PTO loads running all of the time, sure it's nice to be able to hook up a snow blower or trencher, but do you have one? are you using this as a tractor or a truck?
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ryland For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (12-23-2010)
Old 12-23-2010, 12:54 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,796

Geo XL1 - '94 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 72.22 mpg (US)

Big, Bad & Flat - '01 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
Quote:
The air filter is oil bath, that has to go
Oil bath air filters are superior in everyway, except one.

Since they do not need replacing at regular intervals, only serviceing, there would be no need for after market sales.

(Oh dear,what would the poor air filter manufactures do...???)




I look foward to following your project...

>

Last edited by redneck; 12-23-2010 at 12:55 PM.. Reason: add
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2010, 01:54 PM   #16 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bandit86 View Post
it would need a 4 foot airdam to get close to th ground so that is out.
You need either a 3.5 foot lowering kit, or a 100% smooth belly pan and some way to get the tires out of the airstream. Tires have absolutely horrible aero drag, so I'd enclose them in Aptera-style fairings.

The DoD is interested in reducing the fuel consumption of the US military. Keep an eye on the ecomods being done to our fleet of off-road capable, overweight trucks.

Also, if you're driving >25mph in a Unimog, or using one for a family vacation, you're doing it wrong.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2010, 02:04 PM   #17 (permalink)
I have to start over?
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 214

Big inefficient truck - '94 Dodge Ram 2500
90 day: 12.1 mpg (US)

Honda Civic - '84 Honda Civic DX Hatchback
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Something I plan on doing is setting up a fuel cell unit for my engine because there is no (cheap and easy) way to electronically show fuel consumption. The fuel pump is on the side of the engine and the fuel tank just has 2 lines going to it, so volume/weight measurements should not be too hard.

I wonder what its FE would be in top gear just idling along (at 15 MPH, lol) but don't hurt your engine (don't suck a liner)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2010, 02:19 PM   #18 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
Also, if you're driving >25mph in a Unimog, or using one for a family vacation, you're doing it wrong.
Considering how slow the vehicle is, I'm wondering if there is any benefit at all to doing aerodynamic modifications. It's just so heavy the mileage will always suck.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2010, 02:28 PM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: duluth mn
Posts: 117
Thanks: 20
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Gasoline Fumes and I have discussed this at length,
We will be unable to help you without pictures of the subject in both mud and snow conditions
Poised next to a much smaller vehicle would be helpful as well
I vote for on top of any other vehicle!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2010, 03:05 PM   #20 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
Considering how slow the vehicle is, I'm wondering if there is any benefit at all to doing aerodynamic modifications. It's just so heavy the mileage will always suck.
Have you ever felt the wind load on a bicycle at 15mph?

Sure, the mileage will always suck, and it will never be the right vehicle for transporting people where there are roads, but are you interested in mileage that sucks less badly?

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com