Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-10-2012, 12:54 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
MIT Study: Stiffer Roads = 3% better FE

I read an interesting article in Light & Medium Truck magazine that I thought I'd pass along:
Light & Medium Truck | Stiffer Roads Save Fuel, Study Says

It's a study out of MIT about the effect of road stiffness on fuel economy. Here' one except:

Quote:
The authors estimate that the combined effects of road roughness and deflection are responsible for an annual average extra fuel consumption of 7,000 to 9,000 gallons per lane-mile on high-volume roads (not including the most heavily traveled roads) in the 8.5 million lane-miles making up the U.S. roadway network. Up to 80% of that extra fuel consumption, in excess of the vehicles’ normal fuel use, could be reduced through improvements in the basic properties of the asphalt, concrete and other materials used to build the roads, the study said.

__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-10-2012, 03:13 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
I once hit a (test ?) patch of very nice, smooth concrete on the London Orbital / M25 - instant fuel consumption dropped 10% right away (while on CC).
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2012, 08:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
Wiki Mod
 
Weather Spotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,042

Max - '14 Ford C-Max SEL
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
I buy that, I know going from asphalt to the chip seal stuff they put on drops 5-10% of my coasting range.

New asphalt can add 5% or more to my instant MPG.
Concrete is ok, but surface texture matters.

My best tank was done on long stretches of highway that were less then 3 months old.

gravel roads kill MPG
Dirt roads are better then gravel but still bad unless they are packed smooth then they can be better then asphalt.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2012, 08:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
quantified for big trucks by cummins a few years back

Relative Rolling Road Surface Resistance %
Concrete polished (best mpg) –12%
new baseline

Asphalt with finish coat 1%
medium coarse finish 4%
coarse aggregate 8%
Chip and Seal Blacktop (worst mpg) 33%

Road roughness can increase rolling resistance up to 20% due to energy dissipation in the tires and suspension (10% loss of mpg).


taken from p. 26 at http://cumminsengines.com/assets/pdf...whitepaper.pdf
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 2000mc For This Useful Post:
Ryland (07-11-2012), Weather Spotter (07-10-2012)
Old 07-10-2012, 10:18 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
Road surface roughness was something that I'd been aware of for some time,but what caught my attention about this study was that road stiffness matters. It's not just that the surface of the paving material itself is deflecting, but that the whole pavement is deflecting as your vehicle rolls over it. For example. it you were driving on a 1/2" thick plate of steel, the steel wouldn't compact or be rough, but it would bend as you roll over it, setting up a "wave" in front of you. Here's another excerpt:

Quote:
By modeling the physical forces at work when a rubber tire rolls over pavement, the study’s authors, Professor Franz-Josef Ulm and Ph.D. student Mehdi Akbarian, conclude that because of the way energy is dissipated, the maximum deflection of the load is behind the path of travel. This process has the effect of making the tires on the vehicle drive continuously up a slight slope, which increases fuel use.
__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html



Last edited by Diesel_Dave; 07-10-2012 at 10:25 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2012, 12:33 AM   #6 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
So light vehicle weight is a good thing!
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2012, 12:55 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
So light vehicle weight is a good thing!
Yes, I would imagine the effect is more pronouced for heavier vehicles. Note that magazine is geared towards fleet managers of trucks up to Class 6 (26,000 lb GVWR)
__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2012, 01:56 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
That a hard surface is easier to travel across than a soft surface is something we know instinctively from jogging or cycling... but I've never thought about it in relation to driving, since that surface is still "hard" to those of us who don't weigh 2,000+ pounds.

-

One of those: "D'oh, obviously" studies that is only obvious in hindsight. Fascinating stuff.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2012, 01:56 AM   #9 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
So, it would help us hypermilers to know which highways are concrete & which are asphalt. Where do we find those data, short of sampling every highway on our routes?

I might choose I-80 over US 50 for a weekend drive to Reno for a 3% gain in FE, but I'd need to know what each highway is paved with before starting the trip. I suspect the Interstate Highway system has pavement standards, but how much flexibility does each highway department have to choose its materials costs v. its labor costs?
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2012, 02:11 AM   #10 (permalink)
F8L
EcoModding Apprentice
 
F8L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 152

F8L's 2012 Prius - '12 Toyota Prius Three with Solar Roof
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 34 Times in 25 Posts
This jives with papers I read from the 70s as well as material presented by Bridgestone for the trucking industry. Smooth concrete was the best.

__________________
2012 Prius Three with Solar Roof - Blizzard Pearl w/dark gray interior: Prius Plug-In 15" Wheels | Michelin Energy Saver A/S 195/65/15 tires | TRD Lowering Springs | WeatherTech FloorLiners | Scangauge II | Morimoto/DDM HIDs 5000K | Clazzio Leather Seat Covers | Best Tank: 71.7mpg@702miles | Best Trip: 95.9mpg@233miles
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to F8L For This Useful Post:
taco (07-11-2012)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com