Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-19-2012, 03:53 PM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: lt
Posts: 35
Thanks: 6
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
Storing CNG at near-atmospheric pressures in easily damaged tubes is ridiculous - and dangerous.

As for the first pic, that bag on the roof instantly doubles the aerodynamic drag.
It is safer because - it has no pressure to explode, and it is outside of car.

First pic is not a modern solution. Modern is shown in a post above.

A safety test:

And my enspiration:

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-19-2012, 04:54 PM   #12 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...the Hindenbergette?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 05:41 PM   #13 (permalink)
.
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Salt Lake valley Utah
Posts: 923
Thanks: 114
Thanked 397 Times in 224 Posts
Compressed natural gas is much safer than atmospheric pressure gas. For one your placing it inside the cabin. You will not be able to hear or notice any leaking gas allowing it to mix with air and ignite. Once that happens that cubic meter of gas in your hatch will ignite all the interior trim and seats.

A CNG tank like on the cng-civic can withstand bullets let alone head on car crashes. And will give you hundreds of miles of range.

You can do it if you want to. Just wait till a cop pulls you over and it gets impounded.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 07:05 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
This seems like a lot of work for, honestly, about 2 mpg. I mean you have to get the methane from somewhere too, which means you may have to sequester it. This would not be a problem if you had a commercial kitchen (Scientific American covered this as a 3rd world energy source a few months ago) but I don't think you're going to produce a cubic meter of uncomp methane gas each day for your morning commute...

...unless you eat a lot of Mexican food.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2012, 05:20 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: indiana
Posts: 4

rolling thunder - '91 geo metro ls
90 day: 44.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I think if you could store it in safe container and had a good supply of it itd be worth trying. I mean why not? Isnt that the whole point of this forum to squeeze every last drop of fuel out of our cars and improve them as cheap as possible.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 09:47 AM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,796

Geo XL1 - '94 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 72.22 mpg (US)

Big, Bad & Flat - '01 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
My thoughts on this would be to put the bag in a small lightweight trailer with a hard shell that could be shaped for aerodynamics.

Since your not carrying the fuel in the vehicle and with proper venting, the chance of a explosion is nearly eliminated and would be much safer if there were a accident.


Parking would be the only problem.


>
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redneck For This Useful Post:
Staska (02-21-2012)
Old 02-21-2012, 11:24 AM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redneck View Post
My thoughts on this would be to put the bag in a small lightweight trailer with a hard shell that could be shaped for aerodynamics.
At near-atmospheric pressure, the trailer would hold so little gas that it'd be pointless to tow the trailer around.

I'd be very surprised if DoT even allowed carrying natural gas in non-approved containers.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 12:05 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JasonG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / York SC
Posts: 728

05 DMax - '05 Chevrolet 2500HD
90 day: 18.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 120
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Staska View Post
You can't do it at back-yard.
Wrong.
I know several guys with NG vans that fill from home.
House pressure is too low so they use compressors.
Not expensive either.

This also goes to the DOT regulations. It is illegal and very dangerous to connect to a vehicle any flamable substance in a non-DOT approved container.
This is why motorhomes must use DOT tanks, not the standard RV tanks. Same goes for NG/LPG carbed vehicles.

As noted above, atmospheric gas is more flamable. When taking hazmat training we learned the explosive potential of an empty tank vs a full one. Very cool videos, but I wouldn't want to be sitting near it !

As a logical note, you could fit quite a few cubes of NG/methane in the trunk of most cars. About like adding a larger batt pack.
__________________



I can't understand why my MPG's are so low..........
21,000lb, 41' Toy Haulers are rough on FE!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JasonG For This Useful Post:
Staska (02-21-2012)
Old 02-21-2012, 02:07 PM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: lt
Posts: 35
Thanks: 6
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonG View Post
As noted above, atmospheric gas is more flamable. When taking hazmat training we learned the explosive potential of an empty tank vs a full one. Very cool videos, but I wouldn't want to be sitting near it !

As a logical note, you could fit quite a few cubes of NG/methane in the trunk of most cars. About like adding a larger batt pack.
Thanks for ideas.

Video of can explosion:

It does explode - because in a can we got a mixture of air and gas. Same would be if we fill trunk with gas in a car.

But same trunk fitted with flexible bag filled with gas is safe. Because it does not mix with air. We take gas from bag, bag collapse. Unless we make two holes and supply air to the bag.

Trailer behind car is good idea, but we could get same result with bigger boat tail as stadet in first topic post. It is outside of car too, and it is mean to be aerodynamic. But it is small.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Staska For This Useful Post:
Sven7 (02-21-2012)
Old 02-21-2012, 02:18 PM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: pjs NY
Posts: 59

Elle - '10 Honda Element SC
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
why not have the bag float above the car. like a helium balloon then you wouldnt be carrying the weight. or would you.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com