![]() |
More data on smooth wheel covers effectiveness
2 Attachment(s)
A couple key findings on smooth wheel covers of interest to this forum, from:
Sofie Koitrand, Adrian Gaylard, and Gianluca Orso Fiet, "An Investigation of Wheel Aerodynamic Effects for a Saloon Car" - Conference Paper - September 2015 Conference: Progress in Vehicle Aerodynamics and Thermal Management: Proceedings of the 10th FKFS-Conference, At Stuttgart, Germany The PDF is currently available online for free. Thanks to the authors and their professional org for that. I will share just a small portion of their findings, but there is more. Go get their paper and read it if you want more. In another thread, a few forum members have been discussing the effectiveness of several aeromods for wheels. This study uses a wind tunnel (with 5 belts) and CFD to study these different wheel designs: https://ecomodder.com/forum/attachme...1&d=1587618780 The conclusion was that the fully blanked, smooth cover wheel saw the greatest reduction in drag: https://ecomodder.com/forum/attachme...1&d=1587618819 That graph presents a combination of the wind tunnel & CFD data. In the wind tunnel alone, the fully blanked wheel saw a delta of -0.013 Cd, the 85mm annular blanked wheel -0.009, and the 430mm center-blanked ("Tesla" style) wheel saw a -0.003 Cd delta. Their conclusion is that in this test fully smooth covered or blanked wheels produced the greatest Cd benefit over baseline, whether measured in a wind tunnel or using CFD. This is a different conclusion than some other recent studies. |
Good find. Note that the graph you have shown simply displays the difference in CFD prediction vs wind tunnel results (ie the error) - not the actual changes in drag.
Versus the standard rim (wind tunnel results):
So the Jaguar results are different to the Tesla results (where fully covered wheels increased drag), which in turn are different to the SAE 2011-01-0165 results (where ventilated front and fully covered rear wheels gave the best result). As I wrote in the other thread: To make it clear, based on the research I have cited in the book, I am not saying that fully covered wheels are bad. What I am saying is that fully-covered wheels aren't always best. I am guessing it's highly dependent on the car to which the wheels are fitted. |
Quote:
|
On a car, at 65mph that could be up to a 1hp reduction in power requirement to maintain speed.
Not bad. |
Quote:
|
At autobahn speed you are definitely saving at least 1hp.
|
Quote:
|
Of course, absent from this discussion is the need for brake cooling, which from a manufacturer's perspective is probably at least as important as aerodynamic efficiency. (And I think it is pretty important too!)
|
Citation needed?
www.researchgate.net: An Investigation of Wheel Aerodynamic Effects for a Saloon Car I remember the name Adrian Gaylard from discussions a few years back. Quote:
https://ecomodder.com/forum/member-f...31-1-26-08.png I did a search and surfaced a few other interesting articles at ReasearchGate: www.researchgate.net/publication: Automotive Aerodynamics Special Issue Surface contamination of cars: a review https://www.researchgate.net: The importance of unsteady aerodynamics to road vehicle dynamics There are links to other articles at the bottom of some of those. Examples: Quote:
www.researchgate.net: The Effect of Base Bleed and Rear Cavities on the Drag of an SUV I wonder whether they really went away and are back, or what? |
Yes, Adrian is a lovely guy.
He gave extraordinarily detailed feedback on each of the book chapters I sent him. Through him, I also got the Jaguar XE for a week to aero test, and then I was able to compare the on-the-road test results with his 'official' Jaguar CFD - and have him comment on the differences! Really down-to-earth and quite frank in his feedback. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com