Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-18-2010, 09:50 PM   #131 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 80
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
robertsmalls,

Lies do not work for me even if they are motivated by desirable objectives.

But I do go ahead and think about the objectives, and shifting from oil to coal has some economic and geopolitical merit. But then making coal as a fuel cost effectively ten times what it does now is a prescription for a depresssion. You should read the EPA study report from last month where they pronounce that a CO2 'capture' cost of $95 per ton of CO2 is expected (top end of range) for what they call a technically feasible process. And just the act of releasing such a study must have a freezing affect on industrial planning activities for the basic industry of our developed world.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-18-2010, 09:52 PM   #132 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CT usa
Posts: 224
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
oops my equation should have been 33.7KWh/gal x $0.20/KWh = $6.74/gal lol
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 09:56 PM   #133 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Hello,

Quote:
Shame on all those who actually learned physics, where the Second Law of Thermodynamics clearly tells that a kWhr of electricity can produce a kWhr of heat but a kWhr of heat can not produce anything close to a kWhr of electricity, but fail to speak up in the face of this widely used trickery in promotion of electric vehicles.
The equivalency is a mathematical conversion. There is no losses in a mathematical conversion. You are getting your knickers in a twist about this, and I don't understand why.

Of course, if you do an *actual* conversion, there will be losses. But we are not doing actual conversions. So, again -- the energy contained in a typical gallon of gasoline IS EQUIVALENT TO about 33.4 (or 33.7) kWh of electricity. This is a way to compare the energy contained in each. It is NOT an actual conversion of one to the other!

The reason they (the X-Prize folks) was that we are all accustomed to gallons of gasoline. Nothing more than that. Nothing sinister or sneaky. They have to convert everything to one common denominator -- so they can decide/show which is more efficient.

An ICE powered car doesn't have to account for the energy it takes to actually produce that gasoline, so why should the EV have to account for the energy it takes to produce the electricity? Can you please answer that question? Pretty please, with sugar on top?
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (09-18-2010)
Old 09-18-2010, 10:10 PM   #134 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CT usa
Posts: 224
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Do you think i should pay $6.74/gal equivalent for an electric vehicle? Lets start a poll and ask people on the street.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 10:22 PM   #135 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 80
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Neil,

You get about 11 kWhr out of 33 kWhr of heat. You must understand that this is a bad deal. And to pretend that you get 33 kWhr of electricity out of 33 kWhr of heat is a lie. And it is a lie with far reaching implications.

If you do not understand that like forms of energy can be reasonably compared and different forms might not be comparable, then we will never get anywhere with the discussion.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jim Bullis For This Useful Post:
RobertSmalls (09-18-2010)
Old 09-18-2010, 10:25 PM   #136 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by miket View Post
Do you think i should pay $6.74/gal equivalent for an electric vehicle? Lets start a poll and ask people on the street.
Is that an accurate number?!? Really?!? I pay 9 cents/kwh so you are off by, oh, more than 100%.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
RobertSmalls (09-18-2010)
Old 09-18-2010, 10:27 PM   #137 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 286 Times in 199 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
Can you please answer that question? Pretty please, with sugar on top?
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post183006

Patrick provides a serious response in post #39 of the above-linked. Neil, as you know very well, one can do a life-cycle analysis for BOTH gasoline and electricity and come up with a more reasonable mpge figure than BTU equivalence.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 10:27 PM   #138 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CT usa
Posts: 224
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
The only time their close to equivalent is when your sitting in your car defrosting the windows.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 10:34 PM   #139 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CT usa
Posts: 224
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Is that an accurate number?!? Really?!? I pay 9 cents/kwh so you are off by, oh, more than 100%.
Electric Power Monthly - Average Retail Price of Electricity to Ultimate Customers by End-Use Sector, by State


I guess im glad i dont live in Hawaii.

edit: i just noticed they give a huge discount for the transportation(trains) not sure if that would or could be applied to electric vehicles. My point was that when you inflate the numbers to look good they can also look bad.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 11:10 PM   #140 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
So you're providing a table which clearly shows wildly varying prices for electricity and simultaneously calling for a price-based conversion system because that would be more accurate?

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video: clever, simple demo of teardrop shape -pointy end first vs. blunt end first MetroMPG Aerodynamics 12 11-21-2015 04:04 PM
Video: active aero (grille block) via shape memory alloy MetroMPG Aerodynamics 7 01-30-2010 11:21 PM
Diesel electric kit car, anyone? R. Q. Riley's latest takes shape (and looks good!) MetroMPG EcoModding Central 11 10-07-2008 02:52 PM
Strange OEM Aerodynamic Shape (longitudinal roof indents) LostCause Aerodynamics 17 03-19-2008 11:26 PM
I need molding s2man EcoModding Central 4 03-15-2008 12:16 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com