Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now

Reply  Post New Thread
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-03-2020, 10:57 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Ecky's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 4,367

Gaptooth (retired) - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 54.26 mpg (US)

Such Fit - '07 Honda Fit Sport
90 day: 41.27 mpg (US)

Connect - '15 Ford Transit Connect XL
90 day: 21.26 mpg (US)

K-sight - '00 Honda K-sight
Team Honda
90 day: 43.14 mpg (US)

Aerocivic - '92 Honda Civic CX
90 day: 64.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,192
Thanked 1,956 Times in 1,235 Posts
To my knowledge, recent naturally aspirated Hondas (last 20 years or so) do not go rich. However, their compression is high enough that, in order to not have detonation issues, they retard ignition timing significantly at high load. Running rich is an alternate tactic which allows a few degrees of ignition timing to be kept, increasing the energy extracted from combustion at high load.

High compression is double-edged. It provides really huge gains in efficiency at part throttle on any fuel, but can actually decrease power and efficiency at higher loads. Toyota's hybrid Miller cycle engines are basically a tactic to never let their engines run at more than ~70% load, thus allowing sky-high compression while never going into zones where they would need to pull ignition timing or run a rich fuel mixture.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

Old 02-04-2020, 09:38 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: ireland
Posts: 102
Thanks: 8
Thanked 52 Times in 34 Posts
That would appear to be a thermal efficiency chart, which does indeed have the same shape as a BSFC chart.

Toyota claim a peak thermal efficiency of 40% for one version of this engine and 41% for the other. I suspect that chart is for the 40% version.

They have actually chopped quite a bit of the the top of the curve as the 40% version has a peak torque of 205 Nm at 4800 rpm whereas that thermal efficiency chart is only showing a peak value of approx 155 Nm.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2020, 11:43 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,571

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 95
Thanked 314 Times in 243 Posts
The OP is probably gone already, but I thought I would point out that that Dynamic Force 2.0L chart is definitely not complete. That engine produces around 200Nm of torque, not only 150. The new Toyota engines avoid enrichment up to a much higher load and speed so you can pretty much mash the pedal hard while driving.

A bit of history on best BSFC load:
In the late 90s and early 2000s, it was common for engines to run stoichiometric at all times below ~4000rpm. On these engines, near maximum load is efficient, with knock limiting efficiency at full throttle.

Then cars started running slightly rich at full load for all rpms to get more torque, and probably to help prolong catalytic converter life. On these cars, you want to avoid going rich, so you're limited to below 80% load or so.

In the latest engines, cooled EGR with better combustion speed/higher lean or EGR dilution limit has actually brought peak BSFC load down. I think this is a combination of pumping losses being negligible down to a much lower load, as well as the EGR gas increasing heat capacity (and decreasing cooling losses).
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2020, 09:21 AM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 57

Smokey - '13 Chevrolet Cruze Eco
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
When I had a saturn SC1, I got into hypermiling. I was shifting at 2000rpm, lugging around all the time. Being a car guy it came to me that engines are most efficient at peak torque. So, I started shifting at 4k and saw no drop in mpg. I tried not to go over half throttle though, because of fuel enrichment. Sure made driving a little more fun.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2021, 04:42 PM   #15 (permalink)
High Altitude Hybrid
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Gunnison, CO
Posts: 425

Avalon - '13 Toyota Avalon HV
90 day: 38.98 mpg (US)

Prius - '06 Toyota Prius
Thanks: 306
Thanked 138 Times in 106 Posts
In the hybrid Avalon I've noticed a huge drop in fuel mileage above 65mph (obviously air drag) (about 35mpg).

At 55mph to 65mph I don't notice much help from hypermiling. (about 40mpg)

Below 45-50mph I start getting worse fuel mileage unless I hypermile (drive with the power meter right at the line between ECO and PWR then let off the throttle and coast with engine off), Then I get better fuel mileage than around 55mph (or about 45 to 50mpg).

Ideally we'd have much smaller engines that output an average amount of power, locked at the most efficient RPM and Load, and the fluctuations of needed power would be administered from a highly efficient hybrid system.


Last edited by Isaac Zachary; 03-29-2021 at 04:48 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com