Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-22-2012, 05:40 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
bheadrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 39

Nissan Sentra - '01 Nissan Sentra GXE
90 day: 46.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Moving Battery to Trunk

I was wondering if there would be any mpg benefit of moving your battery to the trunk. I'm sure there would be a greater benefit for rear wheel drive vehicles, but not sure about front wheel drive.
It's generally cooler there, so this should help the battery maintain the charge as well as improving the battery's longevity. Granted, more wire running the length of the car could add resistance losses, but with a 4GA copper wire, I'm sure the loss would be minimal. I haven't seen it mentioned here, and I thought perhaps it would be in the realm of things that have been discussed.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-22-2012, 06:22 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 355

The Truck - '02 Nissan GU Patrol ST
Thanks: 5
Thanked 76 Times in 50 Posts
No
Unless you have another purpose, there will be no benefit to fuel economy.
Most std battery locations have battery set in a cooler area under bonnet with insulating covers/boxes, so that should be fine, an additional vent can be added using flexible hose if you feel additional cooling is required.
Running the accessories won't be an issue, but, look at the size of the wire that goes to the starter motor, as you increase the length of that wire, you will also need to increase the diameter so you don't lose voltage.
More cost/complications & no benefit, why would you do it?

Last edited by Tesla; 03-22-2012 at 06:30 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2012, 06:28 PM   #3 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I'm eagerly awaiting the logic for this one.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2012, 07:18 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
If you road race regularly... you still won't see improvement at the pump. But your Sentra will be just a teeny bit better balanced.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2012, 07:30 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
bheadrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 39

Nissan Sentra - '01 Nissan Sentra GXE
90 day: 46.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I know BMW has batterys trunk-mounted for the sake of weight distribution. A lot of other racing enthusiasts mount their battery in the rear for the same reason.
My logic was that that the cooler temp might be better for the battery, but yeah, it doesn't really stand up to scrutiny.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2012, 07:40 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 92
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
if anyone touches your car you should get a car wash cuz the fingerprint could cause bad aerodynamics, that would reduce your mpg.

always remember that.

(don't mean to be rude, just lets please stick to things that can save you more than .0001 cent in gas per year) like $5 per year minimum ;-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2012, 08:13 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 593
Thanks: 106
Thanked 114 Times in 72 Posts
My CNG powered Tempo had the battery in the trunk, because some parts of the fuel system needed the room up front. Having the battery taking up space back there was annoying, even if it saved a whole gallon every 1000 miles (by magic?) I'd still rather have it up front.
__________________
Work From Home mod has saved more fuel than everything else put together.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2012, 08:16 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 99

Panzerwagon - '02 Skoda Fabia
90 day: 53.88 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bheadrick View Post
My logic was that that the cooler temp might be better for the battery, but yeah, it doesn't really stand up to scrutiny.
I thought batteries preferred moderate warmth?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2012, 10:18 PM   #9 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,811

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,479 Times in 3,444 Posts
The theory posited by the OP appears just as absurd to me as it does to many others, but it's great that the question was asked anyhow. Approaching a problem from many different angles is important, and I would encourage others to be so bold when they have an idea.

While I may have a strong aptitude for physics, I would find other subjects such as physiology quite challenging. I would hope to find people that are considerate with my wild questions/interest.

All this to say that the OP is a brand new member, and I look forward to continued contributions to the efficiency discussion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RunningStrong View Post
I thought batteries preferred moderate warmth?
Most chemical reactions are aided by heat, and that is why batteries in freezing temperatures perform so poorly. Obviously you don't want to cook the batteries either.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
Ladogaboy (03-22-2012), larrybuck (03-22-2012), Peter7307 (03-23-2012), Sven7 (03-22-2012)
Old 03-22-2012, 10:49 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
My car's battery is located in the trunk, and that is done primarily for weight distribution purposes. As far as I know, it has no affect on mileage whatsoever. Also, something to consider: If you are running the battery in the rear, more wiring is required to connect it to everything in the front of the car (such as alternator, ignition system, ECU, etc.). That extra wiring does add some weight and some impedance, so that would offset any potential gains from battery efficiency.

That being said, I have been thinking of ways to maximize my battery terminal location. I can easily upsize or downsize my battery; run two batteries in parallel; and have easy access for alternative charging methods.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com