Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Success Stories
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-10-2011, 03:54 AM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Hauki's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Turku archipelago, Finland
Posts: 45

Scudo - '98 Fiat Scudo (van) 1.9 TD
90 day: 40.94 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
*warning - long post!*

Once aftermarket wheels/tyres go on, the door jam sticker is as much use as a one-legged man at an arse-kicking party.

But even with stock tyres on I would be inclined to run at max psi or as near to max as you deem comfortable.

Wiki'd:
"Should a low pressure tire be forced to perform an evasive maneuver, the tire wall will be more pliable than had it been of a higher pressure, and thus it will "roll" under the wheel. This increases the entire roll movement of the car, and diminishes tire contact area on the negative side of the vector. Thus only half the tire is in contact with the road, and the tire may deform to such an extent that the side wall on the positive vector side becomes in contact with the road. The probability of failing in the emergency maneuver is thus increased.

Further, with low tire pressure—due to the side wall being more pliable—the tire will absorb more of the irregular forces from normal driving, and with this constant bending of the side wall as it absorbs the contours of the road, it heats up the tire wall to possibly dangerous temperatures, as well as degrades the steel wire reinforcement; this often leads to side wall blow-outs. In an extreme case of this phenomenon, the vehicle may drive into a pot-hole, or a hard elevation in the road. Due to the low tire pressure, the side wall at the contact area will temporarily collapse, thereby wedging the tire between the wheel and road, resulting in a tire laceration and blow-out, as well as a damaged wheel.

High tire pressures are more inclined to keep its shape during any encounter, and will thus transmit the forces of the road to the suspension, rather than being damaged itself. This allows for an increased reaction speed, and "feel" the driver perceives of the road. Modern tire designs allow for minimal tire contact surface deformity during high pressures, and as a result the traditional wear on the center of the tire due to reasonably high pressures is only known to very old or poorly designed tires."

My opinion on this is,
Bridgestone, Dunlop, Pirelli etc spend a damn sight longer testing tyres tolerances and flex at varying pressures than the car manufacturer. So if the sidewall says it is safe up to 50PSI, then you can be damn sure it is safe up to 50PSI. They will have pressure tested these in multiple different temperatures, humidty & conditions. Max pressure means exactly that, the max pressure the tyre can go to whilst retaining all its design characteristics and effectiveness. IT IS NOT the max pressure the tyre will inflate too, you will probably get 100PSI into a standard tyre!

IMHO, max sidewall pressure is optimum pressure. To think your cars handling is going to be dangerous inflating your tyres above the pressure stated on the door jam sticker is quite frankly, ludicrous. As stated, this is designed more for comfort than anything else. And I would suspect in some auto manufacturers, this is to hide a multitude of sins in the cars chassis/suspension so it is purposeful set to 32 or whatever to hide these flaws.

__________________
Goal: 5 L/100 km
Currently:

Car Spares

Last edited by Hauki; 06-10-2011 at 04:19 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-10-2011, 08:20 AM   #12 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hauki View Post
....Once aftermarket wheels/tyres go on, the door jam sticker is as much use as a one-legged man at an arse-kicking party.....
I am going to disagree with that. The load carrying capacity defined by the placard tire size and pressure tells you a lot about what the vehicle manufacturer was thinking - and he has a lot of expertise in this area. You can disagree with the compromises that he made, but you can't completely ignore what basic information is available.

By the same token, the load carrying capacity of the aftermarket tires can be determined as well. So you have some basic infomation to connect those 2 items. It would be better to know what each of those is.

We can discuss the merits of various inflation pressures, but without knowing the basic information about what the vehicle manufacturer was specifying, and how the aftermarket tire fits into that picture - then, indeed we would have a one legged man.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 09:52 AM   #13 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill in Houston View Post
"Yeah, the manufacturer didn't design the grille right, and the air dam is too high, and the underbody is a mess, and a lip on that hatch would drop the Cd by 0.01,
BUT
I am POSITIVE that he is EXACTLY right on the tire inflation pressure, and that that single number is correct for all drivers, all tire manufacturers, all tire styles, and all driving conditions."
Just listen to yourself.
Bill, that's the funniest thing I've read in a while.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
mcrews (09-30-2012)
Old 06-10-2011, 11:03 AM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie View Post
Bill, that's the funniest thing I've read in a while.
But really didnt lend much to the discussion.

I was under the impression that we are adults...



Are there any vehicle engineers here who can say that overinflating a tire past sticker value doesnt;

-decrease safety
-increase expense because of faster tire wear

?



I really would like to believe overinflating a tire past sticker is not an unwise thing to do. I don't think one can fault somebody for being cautious of claims made over the internet especially when said claims have pros and cons that could be debated ad infinitum. This is not personal, I was hoping we could exchange thoughts about this in an adult way. Thanks to those who have done so thus far.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 01:05 PM   #15 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by iskyfly View Post
Are there any vehicle engineers here who can say that overinflating a tire past sticker value doesnt;

-decrease safety
-increase expense because of faster tire wear

?
I'm trying to figure out what pressure to use in my Firestones on the old Explorer I just picked up. Knowing that the vehicle engineers are more concerned with safety than comfort and ride characteristics, I won't use the numbers on the actual tire as a guide but will stick only with the door sill sticker.

The only engineers involved that got to act as engineers were the ones who set the sidewall pressures. They aren't talking about how much room they left above that number, but you can be pretty certain that the actual limit isn't below that. The vehicle manufacturer came up with their numbers based on how they made the ride feel. That's focus group engineering. I'll worry about my own ride feel, okay?

-Tire wear is a function of the tire, not the car.
-Safety, is your concern loss of traction or blowout risk? If it's blowout, pay attention to the sidewall. If you're worried about traction, don't outdrive your tires. If a few PSI is the difference between a safe corner and a fatal accident, I'd point fingers at the driver and ignore everything else. You shouldn't be driving that close to the edge on public roads.

And yes, I work at a dealership and we treat that sticker and other factory specs like they're laws. That's not because they are, it's because we're representing the factory and that's our schtick.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 01:54 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
[QUOTE=Fat Charlie;244256]-Tire wear is a function of the tire, not the car.

That doesn't negate the fact that over inflated tires increase tire wear. If our goal is to decrease the expense of operating a vehicle then how does replacing tires more often because of over inflation fit that objective?

Quote:
-Safety, is your concern loss of traction or blowout risk?
Huh? Safety should be everybody's concern. Should we be put at risk of getting rear ended, run over by somebody who over inflated their tires?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 02:25 PM   #17 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Safety is everybody's concern, and tire safety here boils down to traction and blowouts. You kind of indirectly implied that you're concerned about traction loss. Anecdotally, I can say that my extra 5 PSI haven't turned the highway into a skating rink for me, even with some vicious rainstorms lately. I'll repeat that if softer tires make the difference for traction it's the driver's fault for driving at that ragged edge of performance in the first place.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 02:33 PM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Hauki's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Turku archipelago, Finland
Posts: 45

Scudo - '98 Fiat Scudo (van) 1.9 TD
90 day: 40.94 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
iskyfly, run your tyres at whatever PSI you feel comfortable with! Never ever over-inflate your tyres for better fuel efficiency, better of with a lighter wallet than dead!

Over-inflation and max PSI are two complete separate entities, you need to realise this. If someone runs at max psi, they are not running over-inflated, they are still within the designed tolerances of the tyre.

Also, I would suggest if your car becomes unstable if you deviate from the car manufactures recommended air pressure, then either a) it is a **** car or b) you have damaged components.

Running at whatever pressure the tyres are designed for, be it at 30 psi or 50 psi, then the car should still handle adequately.

An over-inflated tyre and an underinflated tyre will bother wear incorrectly, but especially the less air in the tyre, the quicker they wear out due to heat build up. Max psi usually gives you perfect wear right across the tread pattern. Running them soft usually causes feathering at the edge and at least causes them to taper off at the sides, which come wet weather, is much more dangerous if you ask me as you have less contact with the road.

But again, it's whatever YOUR comfortable with! YOU make the decision.
__________________
Goal: 5 L/100 km
Currently:

Car Spares
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 06:04 PM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 228
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie View Post
Bill, that's the funniest thing I've read in a while.
Thank Yooo! I'll be here all week!

Quote:
Originally Posted by iskyfly View Post
But really didnt lend much to the discussion.
Instead of rolling your eyes, pay attention and think about it. Try again. I know you can do it.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill in Houston For This Useful Post:
mcrews (09-30-2012)
Old 06-11-2011, 11:13 PM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
NHRABill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 191

Tahoe - '95 Chevrolet Tahoe LT
90 day: 13.22 mpg (US)

SRX - '04 Cadillac SRX AWD

XL - '05 Harley Davidson Sportster XL
90 day: 49.97 mpg (US)

Alero - '02 Oldsmobile Alero GLS

Corvette - '75 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by iskyfly View Post
But really didnt lend much to the discussion.

I was under the impression that we are adults...



Are there any vehicle engineers here who can say that overinflating a tire past sticker value doesnt;

-decrease safety
-increase expense because of faster tire wear

?



I really would like to believe overinflating a tire past sticker is not an unwise thing to do. I don't think one can fault somebody for being cautious of claims made over the internet especially when said claims have pros and cons that could be debated ad infinitum. This is not personal, I was hoping we could exchange thoughts about this in an adult way. Thanks to those who have done so thus far.
don't even bother... some people just like to argue even if they know they are wrong.

__________________
2012 Chevrolet Traverse *active*
2002 Oldsmobile Alero GLS *active*
2002 S10 2wd p/u 139,000mi. *active*
1975 Corvette Stingray *active*
1994 Camaro Z28 Convertible 149k *Sold 2013*
1998 Blazer ZR2 189k *Sold 2012*
1995 Tahoe LT 250k *Sold 2011*

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com