Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-29-2014, 12:04 AM   #11 (permalink)
T-100 Road Warrior
 
BamZipPow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 1,921

BZP T-100 (2010) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 24 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2011) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 23.66 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2009) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 19.01 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2012) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 25.45 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2013) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 25.79 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2014) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 23.18 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2015) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 23.85 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2016) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 17.62 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2017) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
90 day: 20.78 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2018) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
90 day: 20.19 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2019) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5

BZP T-100 (2020) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5

2012 Scion iQ - '12 Scion iQ Base
Thanks: 3,502
Thanked 1,395 Times in 968 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to BamZipPow
I put some bracing (shelving brackets) on the outside of my Coroplast covers.

__________________
Dark Aero-The world's first aerodynamic single wheel boat tail!

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-29-2014, 12:47 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDevil View Post
The skirts need to be really stiff to work right.
The cardboard does not look very rigid, esp. those 2 vertical folds. If it deforms or vibrates that will reduce its effect big time.
That's a thought!

When I did my temporary covers, I used stiff board (sort of double-thick illustration board) instead of cardboard for this very reason. Very happy with it... even with just a pencil's width clearance to the tires, they didn't rub or flap at all.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2014, 01:54 AM   #13 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowmeat View Post
You can make them lower, bro! They probably don't cover enough real estate to do much as-is. Black Widow's are fully horizontal, and they come within a half inch of the rear tires. The trick is to flare them out ever so slightly at the bottom, which is accomplished when you attach the front and rear lowest screws/clips.unfortunately the length is a limitation i do want to impose on myself. i'm pretty sure i'll be able to take the tire off without removing the skirt at this height. i also thought it was near the height used on the ev1, so i was hoping it would be good enough for a sc1

I would test them for a full tank, that'll give you a better idea if they are going to be worth permanently installing. If you're questioning your instant read-outs, there's nothing like a full tank's mpgs to average all the conditions out. i just dont have consistent enough tanks for this

I don't have any instrumentation, but in all honesty mine really don't make much of a difference, maybe because my wheel wells are smaller than the average car's. They definitely get people talking about the car, though! My installation is on here somewhere if you want to see how to NOT do it, lol!


Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
If SG testing isn't conclusive, it's time to move to coast down tests.
im thinking that will have to be my method next time around. if nothing else, it requires less fuel

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDevil View Post
The skirts need to be really stiff to work right.
The cardboard does not look very rigid, esp. those 2 vertical folds. If it deforms or vibrates that will reduce its effect big time.

Cardboard is usually much stiffer in one direction than the other.
The central layer forms a wave shape between the outer layers, creating channels in between. It bends easily parallel to those channels, not so across them.
I suspect you used it in vertical orientation (the folds seem smooth, like they'd be when folded parallel with the channels)

If you do a rerun with horizontally oriented cardboard skirts that may show better results. Make it a double layer just to be sure.

Even if it works I'd expect a reduction in fuel consumption of about 1 - 1.5 %.
It will be hard to prove it does make a difference.
i had thought about this when making them, and the channels within the cardboard are horizontal. the 2 vertical folds are because its the top and bottom flaps of the box they were made from. the skirts were 31" long, so they were the best chunks i had around. i thought they were actually surprisingly stiff on the car, i think the most helpful thing was overlapping them onto the body 1 1/2 - 2". i dont know if i would have been able to tell if they were flapping or vibrating during the run, but with just some standard masking tape holding them on i would have thought i woulda lost one, or have one atleast come loose on the end after roughly 20miles at 65mph


so my current idea moving forward is that maybe there is alot of air moving out through the wheel well, and that from the view of the car from the underside, my rear wheel wells are more like parachutes now. to try to fix that im thinking to try rear wheel spats, that depending on what things look like from the underside of the car, might extend a bit further inward to try to keep air from blowing up into the wheel wells.... if they help, then adding the skirts back might show a greater benefit
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2014, 07:13 AM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: MI
Posts: 54

grey panther - '02 Mercury Grand Marquis
Team Panther
90 day: 27.15 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
What about testing the Aero at a higher speed, say 75MPH?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2014, 01:16 PM   #15 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
I was thinking of trying to start from 75 when I do coast downs, but the roads suitable for 75 are also typically too busy in daylight hours for me on doing a coast down. I would have ran higher speeds initially, but I had found in previous tests that if I run faster than, or even near the typical speed of other cars on the road that I'll end up following / pacing / drafting / hoping to pass someone, more of the time. I used to live near an under utilized 4 lane, but since recently moving, I'm still on the lookout for better spots to run

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com