11-06-2010, 01:19 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / York SC
Posts: 728
Thanks: 120
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
|
NASCAR aero tech.
I'll preface this by saying yes, their goals are a bit different than ours. They need downforce, but drag reduction is valuable.
These folks have 2 things most of us dont, wind tunnels and money.
Today a car almost failed inspection due to some "modifications" to his bumper.
The judges were running their hands where the bumper curves to meet the fender.
They applied some very thick decals on the break. I'm guessing these work like vortex generators to make the air bend and not seperate from the fender?
They seem to have passed with "OH, thats just our sponsors decal" :angel:
What they wont do for a few thousands per lap !
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-06-2010, 04:37 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,272
Thanks: 24,394
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
nose
The whole nose,wrapping well back into the fenders is all in a positive pressure regime and flow separation is impossible there,so under these circumstances I don't think that anything like a VG could do them any good.
If the decals covered and cleaned up a gap in the bodywork that might be a plus.
And once in 'traffic' the car will not perform anything like in practice do to the 'dirty ' air all around it.
If they are leading,then cooling system drag and spoiler angles are probably the critical factors,balancing road-holding and cooling between free'd up horsepower.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-06-2010, 05:19 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / York SC
Posts: 728
Thanks: 120
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
|
There goes my theory
|
|
|
11-06-2010, 05:31 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,272
Thanks: 24,394
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
theory
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonG
There goes my theory
|
Yogi Berra said" you can see a lot just by looking." And for the $2,000/hour the NASCAR teams are spending on their cars in the wind tunnel,we can't overlook any small thing they're willing to do for that split-second advantage.
So your attention to detail is the kind of thing teams pay big money for.Certainly not a liability!
|
|
|
11-06-2010, 10:21 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...just be sure to inform those NASCAR boys that it's called "Basjoo'ing" when they seal-up seams and joints with those Sponsor Decals (ha,ha)!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to gone-ot For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-13-2011, 08:19 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / York SC
Posts: 728
Thanks: 120
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
|
Noticed these wheels in a car I had the opportunity to run a few laps in.
No, I don't have MPG#s to post. Too busy doing 150 in a circle to plug in the Scangage.
|
|
|
09-13-2011, 08:50 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
|
They already started pulsing and gliding a while back. If this keeps up the NASCAR-people are going to start joining the forum soon.
__________________
2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
09-14-2011, 02:13 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Posts: 145
Super Duty - '12 Ford F250 Super Duty XLT Long Bed Super-Cab 90 day: 15.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
Hey? Weren't the NASCAR guys the original inventors of "drafting"? lol]
Just kidding but that's where I saw it the first time on TV NASCAR races.
If they save fuel and use it to slingshot themselves it has a purpose!
I wonder is there are any stock car racers on here.
|
|
|
09-14-2011, 02:32 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Muscle Car Modder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 117
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
I tried finding what was so "aero" about the NASCAR aero rims at one time. I came up with nothing. Seems like they would make a good amount of turbulence.
__________________
2000 Mustang GT
273hp/ 309ft.lbs.
Cd 0.36 Im working on it
|
|
|
09-14-2011, 09:37 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 491
Thanks: 170
Thanked 69 Times in 44 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floordford
I tried finding what was so "aero" about the NASCAR aero rims at one time. I came up with nothing. Seems like they would make a good amount of turbulence.
|
I think that NASCAR tries to spec a lot of items to reduce the game playing. I "think" I read somewhere that the wheels were spec and tightly controlled. There have been times when one team has taken tires and wheels from an entirely different team when tires were short for some reason.
Much of the body contour is also spec. requiring that they shape pass a template test. There are still a few areas where there are slight openings for innovation. Driving skill, pit strategies, and luck are the huge variables.
|
|
|
|