Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > DIY / How-to
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-08-2017, 12:49 AM   #11 (permalink)
Growin a stash
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 803
Thanks: 412
Thanked 304 Times in 228 Posts
I disagree on the Scangauge. I don't think it's helpful. The Cruze already has a good, nearly instantaneous mpg display that's probably accurate +/-10%, plus stats on how much power the AC is using, etc.

__________________


2024 Chevy Bolt

Previous:
2015 Nissan Leaf S, 164 mpge
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-10-2017, 07:57 AM   #12 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Instantaneous is meaningless without short trip and long trip.

I'm also a big fan of real coolant temp numbers, not just cold, okay and too hot.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
Daschicken (08-24-2017), Xist (04-21-2017)
Old 04-10-2017, 09:44 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: na
Posts: 1,025
Thanks: 277
Thanked 218 Times in 185 Posts
Cobalt, Impala & I think Cruzes have digital water temp as well. Only one average resettable average. I don't see a need for one (SG2) in my Cobalt either, I've had it hooked up but just looking at other stuff. LTFT, timing, intake air temp, etc.... SG2's don't work with different ethanol content's(without recalibration) the factory gauge does.

Last edited by roosterk0031; 04-10-2017 at 10:06 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 09:47 AM   #14 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Awesome to see factories giving real numbers on their instruments!

Even if it's just sometimes.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 01:23 PM   #15 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,882

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 500
Thanked 865 Times in 652 Posts
If he had a base with a manual xmsn he would already be getting 40+
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2017, 08:09 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ME_Andy View Post
I disagree on the Scangauge. I don't think it's helpful. The Cruze already has a good, nearly instantaneous mpg display that's probably accurate +/-10%, plus stats on how much power the AC is using, etc.
All new cars do this, but the critical parameter 'engine load' is always missing. Even if you have a car that gives you points/ stars as you drive, they're always set too conservatively.

Plus the auto resetting short trip is worth it's weight in gold.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2017, 04:10 PM   #17 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,501

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 309
Thanked 2,067 Times in 1,397 Posts
I would look at wheels / tires and grill block

Tires: Going from Low Rolling Resistance tires (Bridgestone Ecopia EP422185/65R15) to regular all-season tires (Bridgestone Turanza Serenity Plus195/65R15) dropped the mileage on both of my 2nd gen Prius 10% from 49 mpg down to 44 mpg. That is a slightly wider and heavier tire. I did it to increase the grip and handling which improved noticeably.

You could do the opposite and go to a LLR tire that is narrower and lighter. Handling will suffer but fuel mileage will increase.

Lighter wheels will also help especially around town in stop and go traffic where you are repeatedly accelerating.


The grill block should give you a couple of percentage improvement and will be more noticeable in the winter when the engine will come up to temperature faster and retain heat better. (Engines run a richer tune when heating up)


I would stay away from chips and engine tuning. Any gains you get in fuel economy are likely going to increase emissions. That is not only illegal but it will also void your warranty.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2017, 09:27 AM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
divedaddy03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 65
Thanks: 17
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Well....believe it or not, less than 3 weeks after I purchased this vehicle (< 1,400 mi), a trucked pulled out in front of me...and I totaled it!

If I can figure out how to upload pics...I'll share.

That said, OnStar was AWESOME....and the airbags worked flawlessly...allowing me to get out, and walk away with only minor bruises, cuts, and scrapes.

Should I consider replacing it with an Eco-Diesel or go back with a 1.4T?
__________________
An Idea:Open Source Hybrid/Hybrid Electric Car Project

Your mind is like a parachute, it only works when it's open.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2017, 10:45 AM   #19 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Congrats on coming through it safely.

Back when I was looking at the Sonic, there was a decent trim level available with a manual and a small NA engine. I'm not digging into today's lineup, but with a focus on economy, I'd prefer to stay away from automatics, turbos and diesels.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2017, 04:47 PM   #20 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,882

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 500
Thanked 865 Times in 652 Posts
I would go for a manual transmission Cruze hatch , turbo not required.

Otherwise the sedan will be getting a different manual transmission diesel trim.

2017 Chevrolet Cruze manual gets 52 mpg highway, 30 mpg city

I would never buy a Cruze with an autotragic

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rmay635703 For This Useful Post:
Daschicken (08-24-2017)
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
chevrolet, chevy, cruze, turbo





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com