Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Introductions
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-28-2013, 08:15 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
New Guy with a Ranger

I was given a '92 2wd Ford Ranger for free by my brother in law, it has an unknown number of miles on it as the odometer maxes out at 99,999 and it is obvious it has surpassed that! All it needed was a lot of rust repair, a new muffler, and some various TLC but it turned out to be the most fuel efficient vehicle I own so it is my commuter at 23MPG. (sad I know)

I am trying to squeeze as much MPGs out of it so I turned to this website. Glad to be here, love to learn all I can!

__________________
OIF Vet
'03 Ford Ranger 4X4 lifted, 4.0L, 33in tires, plywood tonneau = 18MPG Best Tank
'92 Ford Ranger 2wd stock 3.0L with at least 189,000 miles! = 23MPG Best Tank
'99 Ford Ranger 4x4, stock 3.0L SOLD............................. = 25MPG Best Tank
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-28-2013, 09:27 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 985

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 415 Times in 266 Posts
AAAAnd you already found the other Ranger thread, so you have some idea of what's possible. Welcome to the site.
__________________
The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 05:34 AM   #3 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 10,390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,255 Times in 1,114 Posts
In other forums, some folks are claiming mileage figures such as 40MPG with Rangers converted to Diesel. Have you ever considered that?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 10:26 AM   #4 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,175

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,475
Thanked 2,538 Times in 1,530 Posts
Welcome to the site. The range is capable of some pretty decent mileage, but driving technique will be key.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 11:00 AM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
In other forums, some folks are claiming mileage figures such as 40MPG with Rangers converted to Diesel. Have you ever considered that?
I have considered it, the initial investment of buying, then swapping in the diesel power train is holding me back.
__________________
OIF Vet
'03 Ford Ranger 4X4 lifted, 4.0L, 33in tires, plywood tonneau = 18MPG Best Tank
'92 Ford Ranger 2wd stock 3.0L with at least 189,000 miles! = 23MPG Best Tank
'99 Ford Ranger 4x4, stock 3.0L SOLD............................. = 25MPG Best Tank

Last edited by Army Ranger; 08-29-2013 at 12:03 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 12:00 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
Welcome to the site. The range is capable of some pretty decent mileage, but driving technique will be key.
I hope you are right. In my case driving technique doesn't have a lot of room for improvement as my entire commute is all highway. My main focus will be on aero improvements of my "brick shaped" 1992 Ranger.

I count drafting semi trucks as aero improvements
__________________
OIF Vet
'03 Ford Ranger 4X4 lifted, 4.0L, 33in tires, plywood tonneau = 18MPG Best Tank
'92 Ford Ranger 2wd stock 3.0L with at least 189,000 miles! = 23MPG Best Tank
'99 Ford Ranger 4x4, stock 3.0L SOLD............................. = 25MPG Best Tank
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 02:50 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoPlotting
 
night9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 101

Sliver - '12 Hyundai Elantra limited
Team Hyundai
90 day: 35.1 mpg (US)

t-ruck - '06 chevy Colorado Lt
90 day: 21.88 mpg (US)

Bob - '09 Harley Sportster Nightster
90 day: 38.88 mpg (US)

Pearl - '14 Toyota Prius C 3
90 day: 48.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
If you mostly drive on the highway -> Look up speed vs mpg. Slowing down will increase your fuel efficiency. Going 55mph instead of 70 mph makes a big difference. As always look into increasing your tire pressure and the possibility of a upper grill block. A scan gauge or similar will be really helpful in finding what works and what doesn't. The driver really does make the biggest difference in fuel economy! Route planning can be really helpful to keep you moving and your speed low.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 06:42 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
On my way home today I finally tried Engine Off Coasting. It made me a little nervous, but exciting at the same time. I am not sure how I feel yet about going down a 1/2 mile long hill at 65MPH with no power brakes, power steering, and the engine off!

I also drafted the slowest semi on my route the whole way home @ 60MPH. I was especially motivated to consume as little gas as possible because I was on "E" with no money for gas before I took off for home.
__________________
OIF Vet
'03 Ford Ranger 4X4 lifted, 4.0L, 33in tires, plywood tonneau = 18MPG Best Tank
'92 Ford Ranger 2wd stock 3.0L with at least 189,000 miles! = 23MPG Best Tank
'99 Ford Ranger 4x4, stock 3.0L SOLD............................. = 25MPG Best Tank
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 08:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 10,390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,255 Times in 1,114 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Army Ranger View Post
I have considered it, the initial investment of buying, then swapping in the diesel power train is holding me back.
Since your Ranger is pre-OBD2, it allows you to use all-mechanical engines if you would want to. There are some folks fitting Kubota stationary engines from refrigerated semi-trailers (ThermoKing) into Rangers and S10s, these engines can be had for cheap and deliver good mileage, around 30MPG (city) to 40MPG (highway). If you would also want to try WVO as an alternative fuel, it would return the investment quicker.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2013, 09:13 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,310

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 27.96 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 48.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 422
Thanked 609 Times in 447 Posts
Barring the diesel swap, you could consider finding a sound Lima 2.3 or 2.5 from a wrecked Ranger and swap that in. Not as much of a headache that way, trying to get the utterly foreign diesel engine into a bay that it was never intended to fit. It'll still all be Ford parts from one end to the other.

+1 on EOC. It's crazy how much distance you can rack up with no engine sounds. I've found myself keeping a running tally in my head of how many miles on my morning commute (personal best, 2.1 miles out of a 23 miles drive) I can do with the engine off. Some of that's on the interstate, so sometimes the engine stays on depending on conditions.

Now to maximize your EOC: how are your wheel bearings? That's a 20 year old truck, and they might be 20 year old bearings judging by how you described its condition coming from your BIL. And the alignment, too.

__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com