Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-14-2012, 01:01 PM   #21 (permalink)
Drive less save more
 
ecomodded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,189

Dusty - '98 VOLKSWAGEN Beetle TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 60.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 134
Thanked 162 Times in 135 Posts
It reminds me of the 81 Cadillac with the 8 , 6 & 4 cylinder mode.
It was called a 8-6-4 engine, a de-tuned big block.
The variable displacement was done by electronic solenoids on the valves along with different fuel mapping when in 6cyl or 4cyl mode.
This guys fuel cut off idea seems very simple yet i am betting it will be very expensive.
I Think a similar effect could be had for $10 by wiring in a kill switch to 1, 2 or 4 of your fuel injectors.

__________________
Save gas
Ride a Mtn bike for errands exercise entertainment and outright fun
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-14-2012, 02:48 PM   #22 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Repeat after me: Pumping losses. Pumping losses. Pumping losses.

I doubt if it makes a difference if you sequence amongst cylinders or go whole hog.
To expand upon Frank Lee's explanation as to why this won't work for a gasoline engine:

We can all agree that shutting off half of the cylinders in a gasoline engine will make the remaining cylinders work harder. This will cause the throttle valve to open so that the remaining cylinders can get more air. I've included two diagrams below, of an idealized throttled gasoline engine. One is with true valve-based cylinder deactivation, and the other is by simply cutting off the fuel injector to achieve cylinder deactivation.



For a true cylinder deactivation system, the valves are deactivated, and nothing is pumped through a cylinder. This makes the p-v diagram of the engines look like the above. Half of the cylinders are actually pumping, while the other half are simply compressing and expanding the captive air mass within the cylinder. The net result is that engine vacuum is decreased, causing the engine to work less in drawing a vacuum. This results in fuel savings.



Now, for schemes which only shut off the fuel injector, the deactivated cylinders are still pumping air through them. This will cause vacuum to rise between that of an engine with true cylinder deactivation, and that of a normal working engine. It'd have to, because the deactivated cylinders are still contributing to vacuum formation.

Now, since the deactivated cylinders are still doing work, that work has to be taken away from the generated power that the firing pistons are producing. The firing cylinders are effectively making twice the amount of effort they'd normally have to make to draw the vacuum. Worse yet, the combined effort for each firing cylinders is going to be more than for the normal engine that doesn't have any deactivated cylinders!

No, simply shutting off fuel injectors will not save gas. It'd have exactly the opposite effect.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 02:50 PM   #23 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Napoleon, Ohio
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
No, I'm not involved in the company other than as a taxpayer.

I live nearby in the same county that loaned him the $50,000.

I am skeptical and interested the discussion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 08:58 PM   #24 (permalink)
EcoModding Jack
 
nimblemotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 335
Thanks: 12
Thanked 58 Times in 40 Posts
I think it was Ford that determined if they shut off a cylinder injector every other firing, the engine could continue to run without radiator water to limp home. So it might have some effect by allowing a grill block and reducing the heat losses in the engine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100 View Post
diesels are different then gas engines in how they manage air. by definition, a diesel has "unlimited" air already. if you want less power, put a little less fuel to the combustion. By defintion, the engine is ALREADY loaded with most efficient air.

I still think this idea has merit on a gasoline engine. Do a misfire by skipping gasoline on one rotation.

In order to maintain same power, you would have to have MORE air, so you would open the throttle more.

Hence, less pumping losses.

This is basically pulse and glide thousands of time per minute.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2012, 11:50 PM   #25 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mechman600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,228

Fusion - '16 Ford Fusion Hybrid SE
Thanks: 190
Thanked 275 Times in 168 Posts
There are a few OEM 6-cyl diesels that run the engine on half the cylinders at idle to facilitate quicker warmup. They switch between the front three and the rear three cylinders every few seconds. Older Cummins ISBs and Detroit 60-series are examples.

DOD gasoline engines must disable the valvetrain when "misfiring" to maintain an exhaust composition of a stoichiometric air/fuel ratio or the extra air pumping through renders the cat and O2 sensor useless. That's what I would be worried about if attempting to concoct some sort of pikey DOD system.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 01:02 PM   #26 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Napoleon, Ohio
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
A bit of an update for those intersted in the HP2g saga. Local newspapers reported last week that Henry County is filing a lawsuit to recoup the $50,000 loan given to Mr. Pelmear. None of it has been repaid so far although it was due in 2011.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 06:57 PM   #27 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Bwahahaha, Henry County now owns that valuable patent!
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2012, 12:34 AM   #28 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by nimblemotors View Post
I think it was Ford that determined if they shut off a cylinder injector every other firing, the engine could continue to run without radiator water to limp home.
FWIW the first I heard of it was on the Cadillac Northstar.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2015, 10:42 AM   #29 (permalink)
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,530

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 39.03 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,252
Thanked 584 Times in 376 Posts
What ever happen to our friend Doug? Is he in jail or living the rich life?
__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2015, 11:27 AM   #30 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
Hopefully in a wheel chair eating baby food caused by owing the wrong people money.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com