Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Success Stories
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-21-2012, 09:21 PM   #1 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
2013 Dodge Dart + Fiat 1.4t MultiAir

Hi -

What do you think of the new Dodge Dart? :

2013 Dodge Dart Photos and Info – News – Car and Driver





Quote:
Three-Engine Portfolio

The Dart starts production in the second quarter of 2012, initially with two engines: the so-called “Tigershark” 2.0-liter naturally aspirated four-cylinder and a 160-hp, 1.4-liter turbocharged and intercooled four similar to the one found in the Fiat 500 Abarth. Both make 160 hp, but they have vastly different torque ratings; the 2.0 whips up just 145 lb-ft, while the 1.4 turbo will offer 184. A few months after launch, a 184-hp, 171 lb-ft 2.4-liter “Tigershark” four will come online. There’s no word yet on a hopped-up SRT4 model (or even a Swinger variant for that matter).

Both the 1.4- and the 2.4-liter powerplants employ MultiAir technology, although the latter features the slightly revised MultiAir 2 system. MultiAir 2 is said to offer more efficient exhaust-gas recirculation by more precisely controlling the start and end of the valve events and extending the opening on the intake cycle. Darts equipped with the 1.4-liter turbo will have just one intercooler, as opposed to the two tinier units found in the Fiat 500 Abarth.
I was hoping for a Fiat Grande Punto to make it to our shores, but the 1.4t MultiAir drivetrain is a nice consolation prize.

CarloSW2

__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society

Last edited by cfg83; 05-01-2012 at 05:00 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-23-2012, 01:43 AM   #2 (permalink)
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lake Elmo, MN
Posts: 109
Thanks: 2
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
The car looks very nice in person. The top level trims get excellent seats and a very cool adaptive gauge cluster (screen).

Personally I would never buy one new. I wait to see what the issues are with any car for a few years prior to buying. Then I buy used.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2012, 10:18 AM   #3 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Looks like a new Neon. Glad to see them do something that doesn't look like a truck or SUV.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2012, 10:51 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 389

2003 Ninja EX250 - '03 Kawasaki Ninja EX250
90 day: 78.57 mpg (US)

Saturn - '99 Saturn SL1 Base
90 day: 47.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 25
Thanked 58 Times in 37 Posts
I bet that car would do just fine with a turbocharged motor half the size. Just saying... Why does the car need 160hp and 184ftlb? A 800cc Twin or 1200cc Triple with a small turbo would do just fine.
__________________
Doing my part to reduce dependence on OIL
Doing my part to reduce congestion
And enjoying it!

If you have to use your brakes, you are driving too fast!

My 101.5 MPG 2003 Kawasaki Ninja 250




Crude Oil Price Today
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 09:16 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 66

Moostange - '07 Ford Mustang GT
Last 3: 21.8 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
It is relatively heavy 'compact' car, 3000+lbs. Size wise, it is very similar to the avenger/200, so it's a 'big' compact car.

Technically, no it doesn't need 160 hp, but horsepower still sells, especially when fuel economy is similar. So to sell the 40 mpg car, the more hp the better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2012, 03:25 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
The highest mileage model will be the Dart Aero:

2013 Dodge Dart Aero: High-Mileage Version Of New Compact Coming Soon

Light weight suspension components and an active grill, among other things...
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2012, 04:19 PM   #7 (permalink)
Hydrogen > EV
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Ohio, United States
Posts: 2,025

Silver Flea - '05 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 994
Thanked 402 Times in 285 Posts
I would never own one. But I have never had a good experience with a chrysler. Style wise, sometimes they turn out okay, but usually they fail in materials and their quality is just dreadful. And things won't get any better with Fiat/Maserati owning them. I mean, I have a goal to get a Maserati Quattroporte, but thats to have a car I can work on and spend garage time with, such as a classical mucle car to some people.

I don't know too much about it, other than seeing it at a few auto shows, but only the top end models look nice. Most of them look a bit goofy, andplain, raher junky. Although I must say, this is way better than the calibre. I mean, I have low expectations of chrysler, but thinking that the neon could be replaced with the avenger? They saw how the magnum did.

At least they a trying, though. If you are lookingfor smething like this, I would suggest the Ford Focus. If you go used, get a standard, but the new autos are supposed to be fixed from what was being weird before. Or, there are the classics, the Vitz, and the Civics and old mini guys.

They say it starts at 17. I saw a decent Focus for just under 14, 13 999. When I looked at nicely equipped ones, they were all in the 24ish range. So thinking of this vehicle, it's going to be up there. Hence why I am going Mustang over Focus. It's amazing how they price cars now a days.

I do love Alfa and Maserati, but if I want quality and economy, I wouldn't get either. Especially the new little step brother.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2012, 04:56 PM   #8 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
Neil -

Ha ha, the Dart was Destined to have an Aero (Arrow) model. Lots of Cruze Eco style goodies :

Quote:
It will include:

- 160-hp 1.4-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine
- Six-speed manual transmission
- Lighter-weight forged aluminum suspension components (replacing steel parts)
- Electric grille shutters that close to smooth frontal air flow when engine cooling isn't needed
- Aerodynamic aids including fender lips
- Low-rolling-resistance tires
CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2012, 07:00 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: houston
Posts: 374

Black Knight - '94 Toyota Corolla
Team Toyota
90 day: 58.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 38 Times in 33 Posts
from what I have read the car has a full belly pan and active grill block.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 12:13 PM   #10 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
I just had to take an online class and one of the things it discussed was the Dodge Dart. Not much meat to it, but it did mention some of its more obvious FE features.

-AC is part of an "option package" with power locks/windows and RKE on the SE (base model). As if they'll actually build more than a couple without it, and those for EPA testing and "see, you can get one for only this much!"

-They say the Cd is .30. They mentioned tire spats, active grille shutters and "on some models," underbody panels and diffusers that cover 2/3 of the bottom.

-Electric power steering, helping FE by "up to 3%."

-Wheels and tires leaning towards FE (they didn't actually say LRR) unless you get 18" ones.

__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (05-31-2012)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com